Introduction: landscape of opioid dependence.

BACKGROUND: The use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain increased 222% from 1992 to 2002. Opioid dependence has also increased significantly, leading to a burden on patients, employers, insurers, society, and the entire health care system. It is imperative that opioid dependence is addressed and treated properly, in order to return patients to being productive participants in the workplace and society. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of addiction, abuse, and dependence and identify risk factors for addiction. SUMMARY: Studies have shown that intensive use of opioids is associated with increased utilization of costly health care services, prolonged disability, and continued use of opioids, leading to abuse and dependence in many patients. While identifying patients at risk for developing opioid dependence is difficult, there are many risk stratification tools now available to practitioners, including the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) or Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP). Understanding the differences between dependence, addiction, and tolerance is essential to managing patients on opioids. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that patients be properly managed when being treated for pain. Physicians and employers have to be able to identify patients at risk for opioid abuse or exhibiting symptoms of opioid abuse and know how to address their needs.

Patient perspective, complexities, and challenges in managed care.

BACKGROUND: Lack of coordination of care is one of the largest obstacles involved with treating opioid dependence. Physicians also face the challenges of managing comorbidities and dealing with relapse. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical, economic, and humanistic factors involved in treating opioid dependence. SUMMARY: Despite the extensive utilization of narcotic analgesics, pain is often uncontrolled. Effective pain management and coordination of care is essential in treating pain patients, as patients who abuse pain medications consume more health care resources than nonabusers. Patients who abuse are 2.3 times more likely to present at the emergency department and 6.7 times more likely to be hospitalized than nonabusers. Managed care organizations are now incorporating integrated approaches to treating pain and substance abuse disorders, realizing that patients must be looked at as a whole, considering alternative and behavioral therapies in addition to pharmacological treatments. They are also able to assess patterns of abuse using pharmacy claims data and alert physicians to potential problems by making use of prescription monitoring programs. Physicians who treat chronic pain must utilize strategies to minimize the risk of developing dependence on opioids, and practitioners treating opioid dependence must employ policies to optimize outcomes. Such strategies include developing pain contracts; performing random urine screenings and pill counts; and setting goals of therapy and re-evaluating patients throughout treatment. Plans must be in place in the event of relapse, as well. CONCLUSION: In order to be successful in managing opioid dependence, physicians, employers, and managed care organizations must work together to provide an integrated approach to treatment.

Prescriber compliance with black box warnings in older adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients prescribed medications with US Food and Drug Administration-issued black box warnings (BBWs) warrant additional vigilance by prescribers because these drugs can cause serious adverse drug events. Seniors are at greater risk for adverse drug events due to increased medication burden and greater health vulnerability. OBJECTIVE: To improve our understanding of the prescribing and patient-monitoring practices of physicians prescribing medications with a BBW to patients age >or=65 years in an ambulatory care setting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of administrative pharmacy and medical claims identified 58,190 patients age >or=65 years in the Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey beneficiary population with >or=1 claim for >or=1 of the 8 targeted medications between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2005. Medications included carbamazepine, amiodarone, ketoconazole, loop diuretics, methotrexate, cyclosporine, metformin and combinations, and cilostazol. Patients were followed 12 months from the index prescription date to evaluate prescriber compliance with BBWs using operationalized definitions of compliance. RESULTS: Patients prescribed drugs with a drug-laboratory warning had lower rates of prescriber BBW compliance (0.7%-24.9%) than patients prescribed drugs with a drug-disease warning (84.7%-90.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Administrative claims analysis identified low rates of prescriber compliance with BBWs in managing patients age >or=65 years. Claims analysis may be a cost-effective strategy to monitor prescriber compliance with BBWs in older patients at higher risk.

Adherence to osteoporosis medications after patient and physician brief education: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether adherence to osteoporosis medications can be improved by educational interventions targeted at primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients. STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data collected as part of a prospective randomized controlled trial to improve initiation of osteoporosis management such as bone mineral density testing or osteoporosis drug initiation. METHODS: The trial was conducted among patients at risk for osteoporosis enrolled in Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. For a 3-month period, randomly selected PCPs and their patients received education about osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. The PCPs received face-to-face education by trained pharmacists, while patients received letters and automated telephone calls. The control group received no education. We assessed medication adherence during 10 months following the start of the intervention using the medication possession ratio (MPR), the ratio of available medication to the total number of days studied. RESULTS: These analyses included 1867 patients (972 randomized to the intervention group and 875 to the control group) and their 436 PCPs. During 10 months following the intervention, the median MPRs were 74% (interquartile range [IQR], 19%-93%) for the intervention group and 73% (IQR, 0%-93%) for the control group (P = .18). The median times until medication discontinuation after the intervention were 85 days (IQR, 58-174 days) for the intervention group and 79 days (IQR, 31-158 days) for the control group. CONCLUSION: The educational intervention did not significantly improve medication compliance or persistence with osteoporosis drugs.

Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications.

OBJECTIVES: To propose standardized methods for measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications and to apply these definitions to a cohort of patients with diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 7567 subjects with diabetes prescribed 2 or more classes of oral hypoglycemic agents in 2005. METHODS: For each medication class, adherence for each patient was estimated using prescription-based and interval-based measures of proportion of days covered (PDC) from cohort entry until December 31, 2006. Concurrent adherence was calculated by applying these 2 measures in the following 3 ways: (1) the mean of each patient's average PDC, (2) the proportion of days during which patients had at least 1 of their medications available to them, and (3) the proportion of patients with a PDC of at least 80% for all medication classes. Because patients taking multiple related medications have distinct patterns of use, the analysis was repeated after classifying patients into mutually exclusive groups. RESULTS: Concurrent medication adherence ranged from 35% to 95% depending on the definition applied. Interval-based measures provide lower estimates than prescription-based techniques. Definitions that require the use of at least 1 drug class categorize virtually all patients as adherent. Requiring patients to have a PDC of at least 80% for each of their drugs results in only 30% to 40% of patients being defined as adherent. The variability in adherence is greatest for patients whose treatment regimen changed the most during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The variability in adherence estimates derived from different definitions may substantially impact qualitative conclusions about concurrent adherence to related medications. Because the measures we propose have different underlying assumptions, the choice of technique should depend on why adherence is being evaluated.

Utilization patterns of second-line antibiotics in a health plan setting.

Increased utilization of second-line antibiotics where first-line agents are appropriate, and the use of antibiotics for viral infections, are leading to the development of resistance. This retrospective study evaluated antibiotic utilization patterns of cephalosporins, macrolides, and quinolones for community-acquired infections in a health plan's patient population. Patients were identified through the health plan's computerized pharmacy claims database. Patients were considered eligible if they had been enrolled with the health plan for at least one year, and had a prescription claim for a cephalosporin, macrolide, or quinolone antibiotic between February 1, 2001 and April 30, 2001. Six hundred fifty patients were randomly selected to undergo chart review. A total of 128 patients (25.2%) from an eligible cohort of 508 health plan members had no documented diagnosis of infection in their chart. Gram staining was checked in 14 patients. Cultures were ordered for only 19 patients. Comparisons were made with regard to first-, second-, and third-line drug use in select documented infections. Of all the patients in the study, only 10.4% (53/508) had chart documentation of previous antibiotic failure. Of the 456 patients who had documentation, 63% had no known antibiotic allergies, and 19% had allergies to penicillin. The results of this study will be used to educate providers and consumers on appropriate antibiotic prescribing.