Traumatic Hip Dislocation: Pediatric and Adult Evaluation and Management.

Traumatic hip dislocation of a native hip joint represents an orthopaedic emergency that should be treated promptly. Dislocations can be classified based on the associated injuries and the direction of dislocation. Expeditious evaluation, reduction, and management of associated injuries are required to optimize short and long-term function of the hip. There are several important differences between the blood supply and ossification of the pediatric hip that necessitate different strategies for the evaluation and management of traumatic hip dislocations in pediatric patients. Appropriate treatment is dictated by the direction and type of dislocation as well as associated injuries. In addition to closed reduction, arthroscopy, open reduction (potentially with fracture fixation and/or soft-tissue repair), osteotomy, and total hip arthroplasty all have roles in treatment. Consensus on optimal postreduction activity protocols after simple hip dislocation remain unestablished. Short and long-term outcomes are largely driven by the amount of time from injury to reduction and associated injuries.

External Fixation Before Planned Conversion to Internal Fixation in Orthopaedic Trauma: Controversies and Current Trends.

External fixation is a widely used technique for a myriad of bone fractures and pathologies in all extremities. Despite its widespread use, controversies and unknowns still exist. This review article seeks to discuss current literature surrounding pin insertion technique, pin-site care, intraoperative use during conversion to definitive fixation, the relationship of pin sites to definitive fixation, and pin-site management after removal for temporary external fixation.

Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing of OTA/AO 43C1 and C2 Intra-articular Distal Tibia Fractures: A Propensity Score and Multivariate Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of reduction loss, nonunion, and infection in intra-articular distal tibia fractures (IADTF) treated with limited open reduction internal fixation and intramedullary nailing (IMN) as compared to open reduction internal fixation with plate and screws (plate fixation [PF]). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level-I academic trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients age ≥ 18 with OTA/AO 43C1 and C2 IADTF treated with IMN or PF between 2013-2021. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Loss of reduction, surgical site infection (SSI), nonunion, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared for IMN versus PF treatments. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients met the inclusion criteria (IMN 33 and PF 77). There was no loss of reduction found. Seventeen nonunions (15% overall; IMN 4/33 and PF 13/77) and 13 SSIs (12% overall; IMN 2/33 and PF11/77) were identified. Despite several risk factors being identified for nonunion and SSI in bivariate analysis, only open fracture remained significant as a risk factor for both nonunion (odds ratio 0.09 for closed fracture, 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.56, P = 0.009) and SSI (odds ratio 0.07 for closed fracture, 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.26, P = 0.012) in the multivariate model. Propensity scoring based on presurgical variables was significantly different between patients who received IMN versus PF ( P = 0.03); however, logistic regression incorporating the propensity score revealed no significant association with nonunion and SSI. Adjusting for the propensity score, there remained no association comparing IMN versus PF with nonunion and SSI ( P = 0.54 and P = 0.17, respectively). There was also no difference in PROs between IMN and PF (physical function: P = 0.25 and pain interference: P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Overall nonunion and SSI prevalence was 15% and 12%, respectively, in operatively treated OTA/AO 43C1 and C2 IADTF. An open fracture was a significant risk factor for nonunion and SSI. Metaphyseal fixation through IMN or PF did not affect loss of reduction, nonunion, SSI, or PROs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.