Plasma ESR1 mutations and outcome to first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with advanced ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: ESR1 mutations have been identified as mechanism for endocrine resistance and are also associated with a decreased overall survival. We assessed ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for impact on outcome to taxane-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients. METHODS: ESR1 mutations were determined in archived plasma samples from patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (AT arm, N = 91) in the randomized phase II ATX study. Samples collected at baseline (n = 51) and at cycle 2 (n = 13, C2) were analyzed using a breast cancer next-generation sequencing panel. This study was powered to detect a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) at six months for patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab compared to historical trials with fulvestrant. PFS, overall survival (OS), and ctDNA dynamics were exploratory analyses. RESULTS: PFS at six months was 86% (18/21) in patients with an ESR1 mutation detected and 85% (23/27) in wildtype ESR1 patients. In our exploratory analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months [95% CI, 7.6-8.8] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.3-9.2] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.47]. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months [95% CI, 6.6-33.7] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 28.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.3-36.9] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.27]. Patients with ≥ two ESR1 mutations had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS, compared to those who did not [p = 0.003]. Change in ctDNA level at C2 was not different between ESR1 and other mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA might not be associated with inferior PFS and OS in advanced breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab.

A kinase inhibitor screen reveals MEK1/2 as a novel therapeutic target to antagonize IGF1R-mediated antiestrogen resistance in ERα-positive luminal breast cancer.

Antiestrogen resistance of breast cancer has been related to enhanced growth factor receptor expression and activation. We have previously shown that ectopic expression and subsequent activation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) or the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in MCF7 or T47D breast cancer cells results in antiestrogen resistance. In order to identify novel therapeutic targets to prevent this antiestrogen resistance, we performed kinase inhibitor screens with 273 different inhibitors in MCF7 cells overexpressing IGF1R or EGFR. Kinase inhibitors that antagonized antiestrogen resistance but are not directly involved in IGF1R or EGFR signaling were prioritized for further analyses. Various ALK (anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase) inhibitors inhibited cell proliferation in IGF1R expressing cells under normal and antiestrogen resistance conditions by preventing IGF1R activation and subsequent downstream signaling; the ALK inhibitors did not affect EGFR signaling. On the other hand, MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase)1/2 inhibitors, including PD0325901, selumetinib, trametinib and TAK-733, selectively antagonized IGF1R signaling-mediated antiestrogen resistance but did not affect cell proliferation under normal growth conditions. RNAseq analysis revealed that MEK inhibitors PD0325901 and selumetinib drastically altered cell cycle progression and cell migration networks under IGF1R signaling-mediated antiestrogen resistance. In a group of 219 patients with metastasized ER + breast cancer, strong pMEK staining showed a significant correlation with no clinical benefit of first-line tamoxifen treatment. We propose a critical role for MEK activation in IGF1R signaling-mediated antiestrogen resistance and anticipate that dual-targeted therapy with a MEK inhibitor and antiestrogen could improve treatment outcome.

High protein expression of EZH2 is related to unfavorable outcome to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with great differences in outcome to both chemo- and endocrine therapy. Better insight into the mechanisms underlying resistance is essential to better predict outcome to therapy and to obtain a more tailored treatment approach. We have previously described that increased mRNA expression levels of Enhancer of Zeste homolog (EZH2) are associated with worse outcome to tamoxifen therapy in MBC. Here, we explored whether this is also the case for EZH2 protein expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray (TMA) was created using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary breast tumor tissues of 250 MBC patients treated with first-line tamoxifen. Quantity and intensity of EZH2 expression were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and both were used to generate and group scores according to a previously described method for scoring EZH2. RESULTS: In total, 116 tumors (46%) were considered to be EZH2 positive. The presence of EZH2 protein expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in both univariate [hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.97, P = 0.002] and multivariate analysis including traditional factors associated with tamoxifen outcome (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.88, P = 0.017). Considering quantity irrespective of intensity, tumors with >50% EZH2-positive cells had the worst PFS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.27, P < 0.001), whereas intensity alone did not show a significant association with PFS. Application of other methods of scoring EZH2 positivity resulted in a similar significant association between the amount of EZH2 positive cells and PFS. CONCLUSION: In addition to EZH2 mRNA levels, these results suggest that protein expression of EZH2 can be used as a marker to predict outcome to tamoxifen therapy. This provides new rationale to explore EZH2 inhibition in the clinical setting and increases the possibilities for a more personalized treatment approach in MBC patients.

High miR-26a and low CDC2 levels associate with decreased EZH2 expression and with favorable outcome on tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer.

For patients with metastatic breast cancer, we previously described that increased EZH2 expression levels were associated with an adverse outcome to tamoxifen therapy. Main objective of the present study is to investigate miR-26a and miR-101 levels, which both target EZH2, for their association with molecular pathways and with efficacy of tamoxifen as first-line monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Expression levels were measured using quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) in primary breast cancer specimens of 235 estrogen receptor-α (ER)-positive patients. Pathway analysis was performed on microarray data available for 65 of these tumors. Logistic regression and Cox uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to relate expression levels with clinical benefit and time to progression (TTP). Increasing levels of miR-26a were significantly (P < 0.005) associated with both clinical benefit and prolonged TTP, whereas miR-101 was not. Cell cycle regulation and CCNE1 and CDC2 were the only significant overlapping pathway and genes differentially expressed between tumors with high and low levels of miR-26a and EZH2, respectively. In addition, increasing mRNA levels of CCNE1 (P < 0.05) and CDC2 (P < 0.001) were related to poor outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed miR-26a and CDC2 as an optimal set of markers associated with outcome on tamoxifen therapy, independently of traditional predictive factors. To summarize, only miR-26a levels are related with treatment outcome. Cell cycle regulation is the only overlapping pathway linked to miR-26a and EZH2 levels. Low mRNA levels of EZH2, CCNE1, and CDC2, and high levels of miR-26a are associated with favorable outcome on tamoxifen.

Decreased expression of EZH2 is associated with upregulation of ER and favorable outcome to tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer.

The purpose of this study is to investigate EZH2 in a large series of breast cancer patients for its prognostic and predictive value, and to evaluate its functional role in treatment response in vitro. EZH2 levels were measured using quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) in primary breast cancer specimens and related to clinicopathologic factors and disease outcome. EZH2 expression was downregulated with siRNAs in MCF7, to assess expression alterations of putative EZH2 downstream genes and to determine cell numbers after treatment with the anti-estrogen ICI 164384. In 688 lymph node-negative patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, EZH2 was not significantly correlated with metastasis-free survival (MFS). In 278 patients with advanced disease treated with first-line tamoxifen monotherapy, the tertile with highest EZH2 levels was associated with the lowest clinical benefit (OR = 0.48; P = 0.02) and with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in both univariate (HR = 1.80; P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis, including traditional factors (HR = 1.61; P = 0.004). In vitro, EZH2 silencing in MCF7 caused a 38% decrease in cell numbers (P < 0.001) whereas ICI 164384 treatment resulted in a 25% decrease (P < 0.001) compared to controls. Combining EZH2 silencing with ICI treatment reduced cell numbers with 67% (P < 0.001) compared to control conditions. EZH2 downregulation was associated with an almost two-fold upregulation of the estrogen receptor alpha (ER) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, EZH2 has no prognostic value in breast cancer. High levels of EZH2 are associated with poor outcome to tamoxifen therapy in advanced breast cancer. Downregulated EZH2 leads to upregulation of the ER and better response to anti-estrogens.

Serum proteomic patterns for ovarian cancer monitoring.

We set out to discover ovarian cancer biomarkers useful for monitoring progression during and after chemotherapy and possibly for diagnosis. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to create serum protein profiles of ovarian cancer patients before chemotherapy or at progression (n = 51) (trial initiated by the Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial) that were compared with those of healthy individuals (n = 31). In addition, sera profiles from ovarian cancer patients after chemotherapy (n = 12) were compared with those of ovarian cancer patients at progression (n = 24). One of the discovered biomarkers was identified and subsequently confirmed and validated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eight primary (sens = 94%, spec = 97%, P < 0.0001) and seven progression tumor biomarkers (sens = 91%, spec = 97%, P < 0.0001) were discovered. In addition, we discovered eight potential progression monitoring biomarkers (sens = 75%, spec = 83%, P = 0.0008) of which one, a biomarker of 11.7 kd, was further identified as serum amyloid A1. Independent validation (ELISA) showed an elevated expression of this protein at relapse in four of the seven ovarian cancer patients tested. Combining the eight newly discovered progression monitoring biomarkers with CA125 resulted in a clear increase of the sensitivity (91-100%). These biomarkers, in combination with for instance CA125, should be validated in large ovarian cancer and control groups. The resulting multimarker assay could be suitable for disease monitoring during and after therapy and might also be useful for ovarian cancer screening.