New insights into posttranslational modifications of proteins during bull sperm capacitation.

BACKGROUND: Due to the unique nature of spermatozoa, which are transcriptionally and translationally silent, the regulation of capacitation is based on the formation of posttranslational modifications of proteins (PTMs). However, the interactions between different types of PTMs during the capacitation remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to unravel the PTM-based regulation of sperm capacitation by considering the relationship between tyrosine phosphorylation and reversible oxidative PTMs (oxPTMs), i.e., S-nitrosylation and S-glutathionylation. Since reversible oxPTMs may be closely related to peroxyredoxin (PRDX) activity, the second aim was to verify the role of PRDXs in the PTM-based regulation of capacitation. METHODS: Cryopreserved bull sperm were capacitated in vitro with or without PRDX inhibitor. Qualitative parameters of sperm and symptoms characteristic of capacitation were analyzed. Posttranslational protein modifications (S-nitrosylation, S-glutathionylation, tyrosine phosphorylation) were investigated at the cellular level (flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy) and at the proteomic level (fluorescent gel-based proteomic approach). RESULTS: Zona-pellucida binding proteins (ACRBP, SPAM1, ZAN, ZPBP1 and IZUMO4) were particularly rich in reversible oxPTMs. Moreover, numerous flagellar proteins were associated with all analyzed types of PTMs, which indicates that the direction of posttranslational modifications was integrated. Inhibition of PRDX activity during capacitation caused an increase in S-nitrosylation and S-glutathionylation and a decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation. Inhibition of PRDXs caused GAPDHS to undergo S-glutathionylation and the GSTO2 and SOD2 enzymes to undergo denitrosylation. Moreover, PRDX inhibition caused the AKAP proteins to be dephosphorylated. CONCLUSIONS: Our research provides evidence that crosstalk occurs between tyrosine phosphorylation and reversible oxPTMs during bull sperm capacitation. This study demonstrates that capacitation triggers S-nitrosylation and S-glutathionylation (and reverse reactions) of zona-pellucida binding proteins, which may be a new important mechanism that determines the interaction between sperms and oocytes. Moreover, TCA-related and flagellar proteins, which are particularly rich in PTMs, may play a key role in sperm capacitation. We propose that the deglutathionylation of ODFs and IZUMO4 proteins is a new hallmark of bull sperm capacitation. The obtained results indicate a relationship between PRDX activity and protein phosphorylation, S-glutathionylation and S-nitrosylation. The activity of PRDXs may be crucial for maintaining redox balance and for providing proper PKA-mediated protein phosphorylation during capacitation. Video Abstract.

Class-specific interactions between Sis1 J-domain protein and Hsp70 chaperone potentiate disaggregation of misfolded proteins.

Protein homeostasis is constantly being challenged with protein misfolding that leads to aggregation. Hsp70 is one of the versatile chaperones that interact with misfolded proteins and actively support their folding. Multifunctional Hsp70s are harnessed to specific roles by J-domain proteins (JDPs, also known as Hsp40s). Interaction with the J-domain of these cochaperones stimulates ATP hydrolysis in Hsp70, which stabilizes substrate binding. In eukaryotes, two classes of JDPs, Class A and Class B, engage Hsp70 in the reactivation of aggregated proteins. In most species, excluding metazoans, protein recovery also relies on an Hsp100 disaggregase. Although intensely studied, many mechanistic details of how the two JDP classes regulate protein disaggregation are still unknown. Here, we explore functional differences between the yeast Class A (Ydj1) and Class B (Sis1) JDPs at the individual stages of protein disaggregation. With real-time biochemical tools, we show that Ydj1 alone is superior to Sis1 in aggregate binding, yet it is Sis1 that recruits more Ssa1 molecules to the substrate. This advantage of Sis1 depends on its ability to bind to the EEVD motif of Hsp70, a quality specific to most of Class B JDPs. This second interaction also conditions the Hsp70-induced aggregate modification that boosts its subsequent dissolution by the Hsp104 disaggregase. Our results suggest that the Sis1-mediated chaperone assembly at the aggregate surface potentiates the entropic pulling, driven polypeptide disentanglement, while Ydj1 binding favors the refolding of the solubilized proteins. Such subspecialization of the JDPs across protein reactivation improves the robustness and efficiency of the disaggregation machinery.

Effect of 2-Cys Peroxiredoxins Inhibition on Redox Modifications of Bull Sperm Proteins.

Sperm peroxiredoxins (PRDXs) are moonlighting proteins which, in addition to their antioxidant activity, also act as redox signal transducers through PRDX-induced oxidative post-translational modifications of proteins (oxPTMs). Despite extensive knowledge on the antioxidant activity of PRDXs, the mechanisms related to PRDX-mediated oxPTMs are poorly understood. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of bull sperm 2-Cys PRDX inhibition by Conoidin A on changes in oxPTM levels under control and oxidative stress conditions. The results showed that a group of sperm mitochondrial (LDHAL6B, CS, ACO2, SDHA, ACAPM) and actin cytoskeleton proteins (CAPZB, ALDOA, CCIN) is oxidized due to the action of 2-Cys PRDXs under control conditions. In turn, under oxidative stress conditions, 2-Cys PRDX activity seems to be focused on antioxidant function protecting glycolytic, TCA pathway, and respiratory chain enzymes; chaperones; and sperm axonemal tubulins from oxidative damage. Interestingly, the inhibition of PRDX resulted in oxidation of a group of rate-limiting glycolytic proteins, which is known to trigger the switching of glucose metabolism from glycolysis to pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The obtained results are expected to broaden the knowledge of the potential role of bull sperm 2-Cys in both redox signal transmission and antioxidant activity.

Bull Sperm Capacitation Is Accompanied by Redox Modifications of Proteins.

The ability to fertilise an egg is acquired by the mammalian sperm during the complex biochemical process called capacitation. Capacitation is accompanied by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), but the mechanism of redox regulation during capacitation has not been elucidated. This study aimed to verify whether capacitation coincides with reversible oxidative post-translational modifications of proteins (oxPTMs). Flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy and Western blot analyses were used to verify the sperm capacitation process. A fluorescent gel-based redox proteomic approach allowed us to observe changes in the level of reversible oxPTMs manifested by the reduction or oxidation of susceptible cysteines in sperm proteins. Sperm capacitation was accompanied with redox modifications of 48 protein spots corresponding to 22 proteins involved in the production of ROS (SOD, DLD), playing a role in downstream redox signal transfer (GAPDHS and GST) related to the cAMP/PKA pathway (ROPN1L, SPA17), acrosome exocytosis (ACRB, sperm acrosome associated protein 9, IZUMO4), actin polymerisation (CAPZB) and hyperactivation (TUBB4B, TUB1A). The results demonstrated that sperm capacitation is accompanied by altered levels of oxPTMs of a group of redox responsive proteins, filling gaps in our knowledge concerning sperm capacitation.

Proteomic comparison of non-sexed and sexed (X-bearing) cryopreserved bull semen.

It is widely recognized that quality of spermatozoa in sexed semen (SS) samples is not as great as for conventional, non-sexed semen (NS). There are differences in qualitative and biochemical variables between spermatozoa in NS and SS. Information, however, is lacking on molecular differences, especially concerning spermatozoa proteomic differences is SS and NS. The objective of this study was to compare commercially available NS and SS bull semen by evaluating sperm quality variables in conjunction with a proteomics approach. Results from flow cytometry and computer-assisted sperm analyses indicated there was less sperm motility, viability, mitochondrial potential and acrosome integrity in sperm from SS. Results from proteomic analysis indicated sperm from NS and SS samples were characterized by different protein profiles. There was identification of 70 sperm proteins that differed in abundance and six protein spots that were different in extent of carbonylation. Sperm from SS had altered structures of enzymes involved in glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation and maintenance of a constant adenylate energy charge. Furthermore, sperm from SS had alterations of several flagella substructures, especially outer dense fiber proteins, which were less abundant and more carbonylated than in sperm from NS. In sperm of SS, compared with NS, there were differences in abundance of proteins involved in capacitation, acrosome reaction and sperm-egg fusion as well as lesser abundances of sperm surface proteins. Results enable a greater understanding of differences between sperm from NS and SS samples, thereby contributing to development of improved protocols for more effective protection of sexed spermatozoa during processing.

Selective Hsp70-Dependent Docking of Hsp104 to Protein Aggregates Protects the Cell from the Toxicity of the Disaggregase.

Hsp104 is a yeast chaperone that rescues misfolded proteins from aggregates associated with proteotoxic stress and aging. Hsp104 consists of N-terminal domain, regulatory M-domain and two ATPase domains, assembled into a spiral-shaped hexamer. Protein disaggregation involves polypeptide extraction from an aggregate and its translocation through the central channel. This process relies on Hsp104 cooperation with the Hsp70 chaperone, which also plays important role in regulation of the disaggregase. Although Hsp104 protein-unfolding activity enables cells to survive stress, when uncontrolled, it becomes toxic to the cell. In this work, we investigated the significance of the interaction between Hsp70 and the M-domain of Hsp104 for functioning of the disaggregation system. We identified phenylalanine at position 508 in Hsp104 to be the key site of interaction with Hsp70. Disruption of this site makes Hsp104 unable to bind protein aggregates and to confer tolerance in yeast cells. The use of this Hsp104 variant demonstrates that Hsp70 allows successful initiation of disaggregation only as long as it is able to interact with the disaggregase. As reported previously, this interaction causes release of the M-domain-driven repression of Hsp104. Now we reveal that, apart from this allosteric effect, the interaction between the chaperone partners itself contributes to effective initiation of disaggregation and plays important role in cell protection against Hsp104-induced toxicity. Interaction with Hsp70 shifts Hsp104 substrate specificity from non-aggregated, disordered substrates toward protein aggregates. Accordingly, Hsp70-mediated sequestering of the Hsp104 unfoldase in aggregates makes it less toxic and more productive.