First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, including patients with ECOG performance status 2 and other special populations: CheckMate 817.

BACKGROUND: CheckMate 817, a phase 3B study, evaluated flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, in this research, we report on first-line treatment in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1 (cohort A) and special populations (cohort A1: ECOG PS 2; or ECOG PS 0-1 with untreated brain metastases, renal impairment, hepatic impairment, or controlled HIV infection). METHODS: Cohorts A and A1 received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-4 and grade 5 immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs; adverse events (AEs) deemed potentially immune-related, occurring <100 days of last dose, and treated with immune-modulating medication (except endocrine events)) and treatment-related select AEs (treatment-related AEs with potential immunological etiology requiring frequent monitoring/intervention, reported between first dose and 30 days after the last dose) in cohort A; efficacy endpoints were secondary/exploratory. In cohort A1, safety/efficacy assessment was exploratory. RESULTS: The most common grade 3-4 IMAEs were pneumonitis (5.1%), diarrhea/colitis (4.9%), and hepatitis (4.6%) in cohort A (N=391) and diarrhea/colitis (3.5%), hepatitis (3.5%), and rash (3.0%) in cohort A1 (N=198). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related select AEs were hepatic (5.9%), gastrointestinal (4.9%), and pulmonary (4.6%) events in cohort A and gastrointestinal (4.0%), skin (3.5%), and endocrine (3.0%) events in cohort A1. No grade 5 IMAEs or treatment-related select AEs occurred. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 (1.0%) and 3 (1.5%) patients in cohorts A and A1, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.7% and 20.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab was associated with manageable safety and durable efficacy in cohort A, consistent with data from phase 3 metastatic NSCLC studies. Special populations of cohort A1 including patients with ECOG PS 2 or ECOG PS 0-1 with untreated brain metastases had manageable treatment-related toxicity and clinically meaningful 3-year OS rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02869789.

A Canadian Perspective on the Challenges for Delivery of Curative-Intent Therapy in Stage III Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a highly heterogenous group of patients with regards to patient fitness and tumour size and distribution, resulting in a wide range of treatment goals and therapy options. Curative-intent multimodality treatment should be considered in all patients with stage III NSCLC. For patients with unresectable disease who are fit, have adequate lung function, and have a disease that can be encompassed within a radical radiation volume, concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) is the standard of care and can produce cure rates of 20-30%. Recently, consolidation immunotherapy with durvalumab has been recognized as the standard of care following cCRT based on significant improvement rates in overall survival at 4 years. The large heterogeneity of the stage III NSCLC population, along with the need for extensive staging procedures, multidisciplinary care, intensive cCRT, and now consolidation therapy makes the delivery of timely and optimal treatment for these patients complex. Several logistical, communication, and education factors hinder the delivery of guideline-recommended care to patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. This commentary discusses the potential challenges patients may encounter at different points along their care pathway that can interfere with delivery of curative-intent therapy and suggests strategies for improving care delivery.

Challenges of Immunotherapy in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma has seen important advances in recent years with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which target the programmed death 1 receptor and programmed death ligand-1, alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, have become standard of care in the first-line setting for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma without targetable driver mutations. However, several clinical questions have now since emerged. Physicians treating lung cancer lack guidance when treating patients who have a poor performance status, patients who are receiving corticosteroids, and those known for pre-existing autoimmune disorders. Furthermore, data are scarce on rechallenging a patient with immune checkpoint inhibitors after the occurrence of a significant immune-related adverse event. In this review, we aim to shed light on these topics.

Efficacy and Safety of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine Compared With Topotecan as Second-Line Therapy in DLL3-High SCLC: Results From the Phase 3 TAHOE Study.

INTRODUCTION: DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand, is expressed in SCLC tumors but is not detectable in normal adult tissues. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate containing a DLL3-targeting antibody tethered to a cytotoxic agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine by means of a protease-cleavable linker. The efficacy and safety of Rova-T compared with topotecan as second-line therapy in patients with SCLC expressing high levels of DLL3 (DLL3-high) was evaluated. METHODS: The TAHOE study was an open-label, two-to-one randomized, phase 3 study comparing Rova-T with topotecan as second-line therapy in DLL3-high advanced or metastatic SCLC. Rova-T (0.3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 42-day cycle for two cycles, with two additional cycles available to patients who met protocol-defined criteria for continued dosing. Topotecan (1.5 mg/m2) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients randomized to Rova-T (n = 296) and topotecan (n = 148) were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age was 64 years, and 77% had the extensive disease at initial diagnosis. The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 6.3 months (5.6-7.3) in the Rova-T arm and 8.6 months (7.7-10.1) in the topotecan arm (hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.82]). An independent data monitoring committee recommended that enrollment be discontinued because of the shorter OS observed with Rova-T compared with topotecan. Safety profiles for both drugs were consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with topotecan, which is the current standard second-line chemotherapy, Rova-T exhibited an inferior OS and higher rates of serosal effusions, photosensitivity reaction, and peripheral edema in patients with SCLC. A considerable unmet therapeutic need remains in this population.

Durvalumab therapy following chemoradiation compared with a historical cohort treated with chemoradiation alone in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The PACIFIC trial demonstrated that durvalumab therapy following chemoradiation (CRT) was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is unclear whether the results obtained as part of randomised controlled trials are a reflection of real-world (RW) data. Several questions remain unanswered with regard to RW durvalumab use, such as optimal time to durvalumab initiation, incidence of pneumonitis and response in PD-L1 subgroups. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective analysis, 147 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with CRT followed by durvalumab were compared with a historical cohort of 121 patients treated with CRT alone. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of standard prognostic factors for durvalumab use. RESULTS: Median OS was not reached in the durvalumab group, compared with 26.9 months in the historical group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.85, p = 0.001). In the durvalumab group, our data suggest improved 12-month OS in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% (100% vs 86%, HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11-0.58, p = 0.007). There was no difference in OS between patients with a PD-L1 expression of 1-49% and patients with PD-L1 expression <1%. Delay in durvalumab initiation beyond 42 days did not impact OS. Incidence of pneumonitis was similar in the durvalumab and historical groups. In the durvalumab group, patients who experienced any-grade pneumonitis had a lower 12-month OS than patients without pneumonitis (85% vs 95%, respectively; HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.2-9.0, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre analysis suggests that PD-L1 expression ≥50% was associated with favourable OS in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT, whereas the presence of pneumonitis represented a negative prognostic factor.

High mortality among hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection in patients with cancer: A multicentre observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that patients with cancer are more likely to experience severe outcomes from COVID-19. Therefore, cancer centres have undertaken efforts to care for patients with cancer in COVID-free units. Nevertheless, the frequency and relevance of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 in patients with cancer remain unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence and impact of hospital-acquired COVID-19 in this population and identify predictive factors for COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer. METHODS: Patients with cancer and a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were prospectively identified using provincial registries and hospital databases between March 3rd and May 23rd, 2020 in the provinces of Quebec and British Columbia in Canada. Patient's baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, cancer type and type of anticancer treatment were collected. The exposure of interest was incidence of hospital-acquired infection defined by diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 ≥ 5 days after hospital admission for COVID-unrelated cause. Co-primary outcomes were death or composite outcomes of severe illness from COVID-19 such as hospitalisation, supplemental oxygen, intensive-care unit (ICU) admission and/or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients (N = 249 adult and N = 3 paediatric) with COVID-19 and cancer were identified, and the majority were residents of Quebec (N = 233). One hundred and six patients (42.1%) received active anticancer treatment in the last 3 months before COVID-19 diagnosis. During a median follow-up of 25 days, 33 (13.1%) required admission to the ICU, and 71 (28.2%) died. Forty-seven (19.1%) had a diagnosis of hospital-acquired COVID-19. Median overall survival was shorter in those with hospital-acquired infection than that in a contemporary community-acquired population (27 days versus unreached, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.4, p = 0.0006. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that hospital-acquired COVID-19, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status and advanced stage of cancer were independently associated with death. INTERPRETATION: Our study demonstrates a high rate of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19, associated with increased mortality in both univariate and multivariate analysis in the cancer population, reinforcing the importance of treating patients with cancer in COVID-free units. We also validated that age and advanced cancer were negative predictive factors for COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer.

Prolonging Survival: The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 15% of lung cancers, and approximately 70% are diagnosed as extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Although ES-SCLC is highly responsive to chemotherapy, patients typically progress rapidly, and there is an urgent need for new therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently been investigated in SCLC, and this review provides guidance on the use of these agents in ES-SCLC based on phase III evidence. METHODS: Published and presented literature on phase III data addressing use of ICIs in ES-SCLC was identified using the key search terms "small cell lung cancer" AND "checkpoint inhibitors" (OR respective aliases). Directed searches of eligible studies were periodically performed to ensure capture of the most recent data. RESULTS: Six phase III trials were identified, with four assessing the benefits of ICIs plus chemotherapy first-line, one evaluating ICIs as first-line therapy maintenance, and one assessing ICI monotherapy after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. The addition of ipilimumab or tremelimumab to first-line treatment or as first-line maintenance did not improve survival. Two out of three studies combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrated significant long-lasting survival benefits and improved quality of life with no unexpected safety concerns. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line maintenance or in later lines of therapy did not improve survival. Biomarker research is ongoing as well as research into the role of ICIs in combination with radiation therapy in limited-stage SCLC. CONCLUSION: The addition of atezolizumab or durvalumab to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for ES-SCLC prolongs survival and improves quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Platinum-based chemotherapy has been standard of care for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) for more than a decade. Six recent phase III trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have clarified the role of these agents in this setting. Although ICIs were assessed first-line, as first-line maintenance, and in later lines of therapy, the additions of atezolizumab or durvalumab to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were the only interventions that significantly improved overall survival and increased quality of life. These combinations should therefore be considered standard therapy for first-line ES-SCLC. Biomarker research and investigations into the role of ICIs for limited-stage disease are ongoing.

Effect of Coexisting KRAS and TP53 Mutations in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: KRAS and TP53 are common mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation Biological Program group found adjuvant chemotherapy to be deleterious in patients with coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To validate these results, patients with NSCLC tested for KRAS and TP53 mutations and receiving chemotherapy for any stage NSCLC were selected. Mutation status was analyzed using next generation sequencing (Illumina) or multiplex recurrent mutation detection (MassARRAY, Agena Biosciences) assays, and was correlated with clinical and demographic data. Disease-free (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was the main endpoint, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Among 218 patients, 28 had coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations, 77 TP53, 37 KRAS, 76 had neither KRAS nor TP53 mutation (WT/WT). There was no DFS/PFS difference for the KRAS/TP53 group versus all others among 99 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.44; P = .57), 27 stage III patients who received chemo-radiation (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32-2.38; P = .8), and 63 patients who received palliative chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.31-1.48; P = .33). OS was longer in the WT/WT group compared with any other group (KRAS: HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .043; TP53: HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.3-3.61; P = .0028; KRAS/TP53: HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .026). No OS difference was seen for KRAS/TP53 compared with the other groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.75-2.13; P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in DFS/PFS between the 4 groups. However, OS was longer for patients with TP53 and KRAS wild-type NSCLC who received chemotherapy for any stage compared with patients with KRAS, TP53 mutation, or double mutant tumors.

The prognostic effect of single and multiple cancer-related somatic mutations in resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Somatic mutations are becoming increasingly important biomarkers for treatment selection and outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of multiple somatic mutations in early-stage NSCLC is unclear. METHODS: Tissue from 214 patients with resected NSCLC at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre was analyzed by next-generation sequencing by Mi-SEQ or Sequenom multiplex platforms. Associations between mutation status, baseline patient characteristics and outcomes (disease-free survival (DFS) after surgical resection and overall survival (OS)) were investigated. RESULTS: Somatic mutations were identified in 184 patients with resected stage I-III NSCLC: None (n = 30), single (n = 101) and multiple (≥2, n = 83). Multiple mutations were significantly associated with younger age (p = 0.0006), female sex (p = 0.012), smoking status (p = 0.002) and adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.0001).TP53, KRAS and EGFR were the most common mutations. TP53 mutation was the most frequent co-mutation occurring in 72% of patients with multiple mutations. In resected stage I-III patients, multiple mutations were significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 2.56, p = 0.003) but not OS on univariate analysis. Patients with KRAS and EGFR mutations were also associated with shorter DFS (HR = 2.52, p = 0.016 and HR = 4.37, p = 0.001 respectively) but no OS difference. TP53 mutation was associated with both shorter DFS (HR = 2.21, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 3.08, p = 0.02). In subgroup univariate analysis, poorer DFS was associated with multiple mutations (p = 0.0015), EGFR (HR = 3.14, p = 0.006), and TP53 (HR = 2.46, p = 0.018) in patients with stage I disease. CONCLUSION: The presence of known somatic mutations is associated with worse DFS in resected NSCLC. The differences are both statistically significant and clinically relevant. The presence of EGFR, KRAS and TP53 mutations was also associated with adverse outcomes. Larger datasets are required to validate whether mutational status is an independent prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC.

Prognostic and predictive effects of TP53 co-mutation in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: TP53 mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been reported as prognostic of poor outcome. The impact of TP53 co-mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue from 105 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre was analyzed by next-generation or Sanger sequencing to determine TP53 mutational status. Associations between TP53 status and baseline patient and tumor characteristics, treatments and outcomes (relapse-free survival [RFS] after surgical resection, overall survival [OS], overall response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS] on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]), were investigated. RESULTS: Dual TP53/EGFR mutations were found in 43/105 patients (41%). Among 76 patients who underwent surgical resection, neither RFS (HR 0.99, CI 0.56-1.75, p=0.96) nor OS (HR 1.39, CI 0.70-2.77; p=0.35) was associated with TP53 status. Sixty patients (24 TP53 MUT; 36 TP53 WT) received first-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced disease. ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 54%, WT 66%, p=0.42). There was a non-significant trend towards shorter PFS on EGFR TKIs with TP53 mutation (HR 1.74, CI 0.98-3.10, p=0.06). When limited to TP53 missense mutations (n=17), PFS was significantly shorter (HR 1.91, CI 1.01-3.60, p=0.04). Among 11 evaluable patients treated with T790M inhibitors, ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 3/3 [100%], WT 7/8 [88%]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dual TP53/EGFR mutations, especially missense mutations, had marginally lower response rates and shorter PFS when treated with EGFR TKI therapy. Larger datasets are required to validate these observations.

Treatment options for patients with brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases in EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC frequently pose treatment dilemmas. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can control extracranial disease, but radiotherapy is often required for intracranial control. We aimed to evaluate the impact of first-line whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) or TKI alone on outcomes of patients with brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC. METHODS: This single center retrospective review included 184 patients with brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC, and analyzed effect of treatment choice on time to intracranial progression (TTIP) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: First-line treatment for brain metastases consisted of WBRT in 120 patients, SRS in 37 and TKI alone in 27. WBRT-treated patients had more brain metastases, and more baseline symptoms. Median TTIP was longer in the WBRT group at 50.5months than SRS or TKI groups at 12 and 15months (p=0.0038). No significant difference was seen in median OS: 21.6months in the WBRT group, 23.9months in the SRS group and 22.6months in the TKI group (p=0.67). In multivariable analysis, age>65years (HR 2.2, p=0.0014), greater number of brain metastases (HR 2.48, p=0.0002) and greater number of extracranial metastatic sites (2 vs 0-1 HR=2.05, p=0.014 and 3+ vs 0-1 HR=2.95, p=0.0001 were associated with shorter OS. No independent effect was seen from first-line CNS treatment choice. CONCLUSIONS: First-line WBRT for brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC was associated with longer TTIP than SRS or TKI alone, with no difference in OS. These results could support deferral of WBRT until intracranial progression in selected patients who are closely monitored.

Targeting the KRAS Pathway in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, significant progress has been made individualizing therapy based on molecular aberrations (e.g., EGFR, ALK) and pathologic subtype. KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated genes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), found in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas, and is thus an appealing target for new therapies. Although no targeted therapy has yet been approved for the treatment of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, there are multiple potential therapeutic approaches. These may include direct inhibition of KRAS protein, inhibition of KRAS regulators, alteration of KRAS membrane localization, and inhibition of effector molecules downstream of mutant KRAS. This article provides an overview of the KRAS pathway in lung cancer and related therapeutic strategies under investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The identification of oncogene-addicted cancers and specific inhibitors has revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment and outcomes. One of the most commonly mutated genes in adenocarcinoma is KRAS, found in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas, and thus it is an appealing target for new therapies. This review provides an overview of the KRAS pathway and related targeted therapies under investigation in NSCLC. Some of these agents may play a key role in KRAS-mutant NSCLC treatment in the future.

p56Lck tyrosine kinase enhances the assembly of death-inducing signaling complex during Fas-mediated apoptosis.

Although the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) is rapidly assembled, several lines of evidence suggest that formation of this complex is not the first consequence of cell surface CD95 (Fas) stimulation but rather a later step in this process. Activation of Fas triggers a cascade of signaling events that culminate in cellular apoptosis. Tyrosine kinases are critical effectors in T cell activation. However, their functional involvement in death receptor-mediated apoptosis is unknown. Here, we used p56(Lck)-deficient cells to show that CD95-induced cell death is highly dependent on p56(Lck) activity and its localization within plasma membrane. We found that p56(Lck) acts upstream of the mitochondria; in the absence of p56(Lck), Bid cleavage and the release of cytochrome c were severely impaired. Moreover, p56(Lck)-deficient cells or cells expressing an inactive form of p56(Lck) displayed defective formation of the DISC post CD95 stimulation. In vivo reconstitution of thymocytes from p56(lck)-deficient mice, which are resistant to apoptosis, with p56(Lck) restored Fas-mediated cell death. Our results support a novel model whereby sensitivity to apoptosis is regulated through quantitative changes in the stoichiometry of DISC components triggered by p56(Lck) activation and localization.