Factors Associated With Incidental Retinal Emboli in the U.S. Adult Population.

PURPOSE: We sought to estimate the prevalence of incidental retinal emboli and identify associated factors using a nationally representative sample of the U.S. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We included adult (age ≥40 years) participants of the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Incidental retinal emboli were identified through retinal fundus photography. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between the presence of retinal emboli and sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index [BMI], hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and history of cardiovascular disease). RESULTS: This study included 5,764 adults (53% female). Incidental retinal emboli were identified in 0.7% (39/5764) of individuals. The survey-weighted prevalence of retinal emboli increased with age, from 0.1% in participants 40-49 years of age to 1.4% in participants≥70 years of age. The prevalence did not differ by sex or race/ethnicity. Factors associated with retinal emboli after adjusting for age and sex included underweight BMI (odds ratio [OR] 7.24 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.06-49.3]), current smoking (OR 6.16 [95% CI 1.49-25.5]), low household income (OR 4.41 [95% CI 1.3-15.0]), and hypertension (OR 2.67 [95% CI 1.31-5.44]). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort representative of the U.S. adult population, the prevalence of incidental retinal emboli increased with age but did not differ by sex, race, or ethnicity. Further investigation into the potential association of socioeconomic and nutritional status with retinal emboli may enable opportunities to identify individuals with underlying cardiovascular risk.

The Association of Vision Concerns With the Physical and Mental Well-being of Adolescents in the United States.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of vision concerns among US adolescents and the association of time spent worrying about eyesight with physical and mental health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: This study included adolescent children (age 12 to ≤18 years) particpating in the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with completed visual function questionnaires and eye examinations. Vision concerns were identified by a survey question of time spent worrying about eyesight and response was treated as a dichotomous variable. Recent poor physical and mental health was defined as at least 1 day of poor health within the last month. Odds ratios (ORs) derived from survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with vision concerns in the adolescent population, adjusting for participant demographics and refractive correction. RESULTS: The survey participants included 3100 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 15.5 [2.0] years; 49% [n = 1545] female). Vision concerns were expressed by 24% (n=865) of adolescents. Vision concerns were more prevalent among female (29% vs 19%, P < .001), low-income (30% vs 23%, P < .001), and uninsured (31% vs 22%, P = .006) adolescents. Participants worried about their eyesight were more likely to have undercorrected refractive error (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.43-2.98). Poor recent mental health (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.67), but not physical health (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.45), was associated with adolescent vision concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Female, low-income, and uninsured adolescents living in the United States are more likely to report worrying about their vision and often have uncorrected or undercorrected refractive errors.

Association of Neighborhood Child Opportunity Index with presenting visual acuity in amblyopic children.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the use of a novel measure of neighborhood quality, the Child Opportunity Index (COI), for investigating health disparities in pediatric ophthalmology. METHODS: This study included children 2-12 years of age from a registry of patients diagnosed with amblyopia at an urban pediatric hospital between 2010 and 2014. Children previously treated for amblyopia were excluded. Patient demographics, residential addresses, and logMAR visual acuities were collected. The association between visual acuity at presentation and COI was examined using linear mixed-effects models adjusting for individual-level factors, including age, sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance type. RESULTS: This study included 1,050 amblyopic children, of whom 317 (37%) were non-White and 149 (19%) were Hispanic; 461 (44%) had public insurance. Regarding residence, 129 (12%) lived in areas of very low opportunity (COI <20); 489 (47%) in areas of very high opportunity (COI ≥80). Children residing in the lowest opportunity neighborhoods correctly identified approximately two fewer letters at presentation with their better-seeing eye compared with children from the highest opportunity neighborhoods after adjusting for individual-level factors (-0.0090 logMAR per 20 unit increase in COI; 95% CI, -0.0172 to -0.0008; P = 0.031). No difference was appreciated in the worse-seeing eye. CONCLUSIONS: Amblyopic children residing in communities with low neighborhood opportunity had slightly worse visual acuity in the better-seeing eye at presentation. Although statistically significant in the better-seeing eye, the two-letter difference attributable to neighborhood environment may not be clinically significant, and the impact of this disparity on treatment outcomes deserves further investigation.

Association of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With Visual Impairment in Adolescent Children in the US.

Importance: Although racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in visual impairment have been described in adults, few studies have focused on the adolescent population, which may provide insight into the emergence of vision health inequities. Objective: To describe visual health disparities among adolescent children in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study of adolescents from the 2005 to 2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants were aged 12 to 18 years with a completed visual function questionnaire and eye examination. Data analyses were conducted from January 19 to July 20, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included subjective (self-reported poor vision) and objective (visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye) measures of visual function. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between the sociodemographic risk factors and each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, and other covariates. Results: The 2833 included participants (mean [SD] age, 15.5 [2.0] years; 1407 female participants [49%]) represent a survey-weighted 57 million US adolescent children, of whom 14% were non-Hispanic Black participants (876), 11% were Mexican American participants (828), 63% were non-Hispanic White participants (816), and 11% were other race and ethnicity (313). A total of 5% of participants (266) were not US citizens, and 19% (773) had a family income below the poverty threshold. There were increased odds of self-reported poor vision among Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.85; 95% CI, 2.00-4.05; P < .001), Mexican American (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.70-4.73; P < .001), and low-income (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.63-3.65; P < .001) adolescent children. Similarly, there were increased odds of visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye among Black (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.41-3.24; P = .001), Mexican American (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.39-3.26; P = .001), and non-US citizen (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.49; P = .02) participants. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationally representative sample from 2005 to 2008, adolescent children identifying as Black, Mexican American, low-income, or non-US citizen were more likely to report poor subjective visual function and perform worse on objective visual acuity testing. A greater understanding of the underlying etiology of these disparities may yield opportunities for improving vision at the population level.

Retinopathy of prematurity screening and risk mitigation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly disrupted the delivery of healthcare. Although most nonurgent ophthalmology visits at Boston Children's Hospital were canceled, premature infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) still required timely, in-person care during the initial 3-month period of the infection surge in Massachusetts. The purpose of the current study was to report our protocols for mitigating risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) between infants and eye care providers and to compare examination rates and results with the same 3-month period in 2019. METHODS: During the infection surge, we added new infection control measures and strengthened existing ones. Additional personal protective equipment was used, and the number of ophthalmologists rotating in the three high-capacity NICUs we service was limited. RESULTS: More infants required ROP examinations during the study period in 2020 than in the same period in 2019, but fewer examinations were performed. There were no cases of missed progression to severe ROP during this time and no known transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between ROP patients and ophthalmology staff. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, effective ROP care was safely provided during the COVID-19 pandemic, and contact with this vulnerable population was minimized.

Virtual Visits in Ophthalmology: Timely Advice for Implementation During the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis.

Virtual visits (VVs) are necessitated due to the public health crisis and social distancing mandates due to COVID-19. However, these have been rare in ophthalmology. Over 3.5 years of conducting >350 ophthalmological VVs, our group has gained numerous insights into best practices. This communication shares these experiences with the medical community to support patient care during this difficult time and beyond. We highlight that mastering the technological platform of choice, optimizing lighting, camera positioning, and "eye contact," being thoughtful and creative with the virtual eye examination, and ensuring good documenting and billing will make a successful and efficient VV. Moreover, we think these ideas will stimulate further VV creativity and expertise to be developed in ophthalmology and across medicine. This approach, holds promise for increasing its adoption after the crisis has passed.

Neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of tuberous sclerosis: current perspectives.

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a complex, multi-system disorder with a well-described underlying genetic etiology. While retinal findings are common in TSC and important in establishing the diagnosis, TSC also has many potential neuro-ophthalmology manifestations. The neuro-ophthalmology manifestations of TSC can have a significant impact on visual function and are sometimes a sign of serious neurological disease. The purpose of this review is to describe the neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of TSC. These manifestations include optic nerve hamartomas, elevated intracranial pressure, cranial nerve palsies, cortical visual impairment, visual field deficits, and ocular toxicity from vigabatrin treatment of infantile spasms. It is important to be aware of potential neuro-ophthalmological manifestations in these patients in order to detect signs of vision- or life-threatening disease and to optimize visual function and quality-of-life.

Auditory Impairments in HIV-Infected Children.

OBJECTIVES: In a cross-sectional study of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults, the authors showed lower distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in HIV+ individuals compared with controls as well as findings consistent with a central auditory processing deficit in HIV+ adults on antiretroviral therapy. The authors hypothesized that HIV+ children would also have a higher prevalence of abnormal central and peripheral hearing test results compared with HIV- controls. DESIGN: Pure-tone thresholds, DPOAEs, and tympanometry were performed on 244 subjects (131 HIV+ and 113 HIV- subjects). Thirty-five of the HIV+, and 3 of the HIV- subjects had a history of tuberculosis treatment. Gap detection results were available for 18 HIV- and 44 HIV+ children. Auditory brainstem response results were available for 72 HIV- and 72 HIV+ children. Data from ears with abnormal tympanograms were excluded. RESULTS: HIV+ subjects were significantly more likely to have abnormal tympanograms, histories of ear drainage, tuberculosis, or dizziness. All audiometric results were compared between groups using a two-way ANOVA with HIV status and ear drainage history as grouping variables. Mean audiometric thresholds, gap detection thresholds, and auditory brainstem response latencies did not differ between groups, although the HIV+ group had a higher proportion of individuals with a hearing loss >25 dB HL in the better ear. The HIV+ group had reduced DPOAE levels (p < 0.05) at multiple frequencies compared with HIV- subjects. No relationships were found between treatment regimens or delay in starting treatment and audiological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, children with HIV+ were more likely to have a history of ear drainage, and to have abnormal tympanograms. Similar to the adult findings, the HIV+ group did not show significantly reduced audiometric thresholds, but did have significantly lower DPOAE magnitudes. These data suggest that (1) HIV+ children often have middle ear damage which complicates understanding the direct effects of HIV on the hearing system, and (2) even when corrected for confounders DPOAEs were lower in the HIV+ group. Previous studies suggest ototoxicity from antiretroviral drugs is an unlikely cause of the reduced DPOAE magnitudes. Other possibilities include effects on efferent pathways connecting to outer hair cells or a direct effect of HIV on the cochlea.

Auditory impairments in HIV-infected individuals in Tanzania.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal hearing tests have been noted in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in several studies, but the nature of the hearing deficit has not been clearly defined. The authors performed a cross-sectional study of both HIV+ and HIV- individuals in Tanzania by using an audiological test battery. The authors hypothesized that HIV+ adults would have a higher prevalence of abnormal central and peripheral hearing test results compared with HIV- controls. In addition, they anticipated that the prevalence of abnormal hearing assessments would increase with antiretroviral therapy (ART) use and treatment for tuberculosis (TB). DESIGN: Pure-tone thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), tympanometry, and a gap-detection test were performed using a laptop-based hearing testing system on 751 subjects (100 HIV- in the United States, plus 651 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, including 449 HIV+ [130 ART- and 319 ART+], and 202 HIV-, subjects. No U.S. subjects had a history of TB treatment. In Tanzania, 204 of the HIV+ and 23 of the HIV- subjects had a history of TB treatment. Subjects completed a video and audio questionnaire about their hearing, as well as a health history questionnaire. RESULTS: HIV+ subjects had reduced DPOAE levels compared with HIV- subjects, but their hearing thresholds, tympanometry results, and gap-detection thresholds were similar. Within the HIV+ group, those on ART reported significantly greater difficulties understanding speech in noise, and were significantly more likely to report that they had difficulty understanding speech than the ART- group. The ART+ group had a significantly higher mean gap-detection threshold compared with the ART- group. No effects of TB treatment were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that the ART+/ART- groups did not differ in measures of peripheral hearing ability (DPOAEs, thresholds), or middle ear measures (tympanometry), but that the ART+ group had significantly more trouble understanding speech and had higher gap-detection thresholds indicates a central processing deficit. These data suggest that: (1) hearing deficits in HIV+ individuals could be a CNS side effect of HIV infection, (2) certain ART regimens might produce CNS side effects that manifest themselves as hearing difficulties, and/or (3) some ART regimens may treat CNS HIV inadequately, perhaps due to insufficient CNS drug levels, which is reflected as a central hearing deficit. Monitoring of central hearing parameters could be used to track central effects of either HIV or ART.

Pure-tone audiometric threshold assessment with in-ear monitoring of noise levels.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to obtain reliable threshold measurements without a sound booth by using a passive noise-attenuating hearing protector combined with in-ear 1/3-octave band noise measurements to verify the ear canal was suitably quiet. DESIGN: We deployed laptop-based hearing testing systems to Tanzania as part of a study of HIV infection and hearing. An in-ear probe containing a microphone was used under the hearing protector for both the in-ear noise measurements and threshold audiometry. The 1/3-octave band noise spectrum from the microphone was displayed on the operator's screen with acceptable levels in grey and unacceptable levels in red. Operators attempted to make all bars grey, but focused on achieving grey bars at 2000 Hz and above. STUDY SAMPLE: 624 adults and 197 children provided 3381 in-ear octave band measurements. Repeated measurements from 144 individuals who returned for testing on three separate occasions were also analysed. RESULTS: In-ear noise levels exceeded the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANL) for ears not covered, but not the dB SPL levels corresponding to 0 dB HL between 2000-4000 Hz. In-ear noise measurements were repeatable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable audiometry can be performed using a passive noise-attenuating hearing protector and in-ear noise measurements.