Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 60(10): 1292-1302, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36328862

RESUMO

The commonest cause of microvascular free flap failure is thrombosis at the anastomosis. Pharmacological antithrombotic therapies have been used to mitigate this risk, but they carry the risk of bleeding and haematoma formation. To justify any intervention, it is necessary to evaluate the benefits and balance of risks. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the value of systemic anticoagulation during head and neck free tissue reconstruction. We performed a systematic review on the impact of additional prophylactic antithrombotic therapy on head and neck (H&N) free tissue transfer (on top and above the use of low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein thrombosis). We carried a PRISMA-guided literature review, following registration with PROSPERO. All studies analysing the possible impact of prophylactic anticoagulants on free flap surgery in the head and neck were eligible. The primary outcome was perioperative free flap complications (perioperative thrombosis, partial or total free flap failure, thrombo-embolic events, or re-exploration of anastomosis). Secondary outcomes included haematoma formation or bleeding complications requiring further intervention. We identified eight eligible studies out of 454. These included 3531 free flaps for H&N reconstruction. None of the assessed interventions demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in free flap outcomes. Accumulative analysis of all anti-coagulated groups demonstrated an increased relative risk of free flap complications [RR 1.54 (0.73-3.23)] compared to control albeit not statistically significant (p = 0.25). Pooled analysis from the included studies showed that the prophylactic use of therapeutic doses of anticoagulants significantly (p = 0.003) increased the risk of haematoma and bleeding requiring intervention [RR 2.98 (1.47-6.07)], without reducing the risk of free flap failure. Additional anticoagulation does not reduce the incidence of free flap thrombosis and failure. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) consistently increased the risk of free flap complications. The use of additional anticoagulation as 'prophylaxis' in the perioperative setting, increases the risk of haematoma and bleeding.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Trombose , Humanos , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Hematoma/etiologia , Hematoma/prevenção & controle
3.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 50(3): 227-32, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21752500

RESUMO

We aimed to assess bleeding complications after increasing the thromboprophylactic dose of dalteparin from 2500 to 5000 units 12h preoperatively in line with guidance on risk stratification and appropriate pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. We evaluated two groups of patients for confounding factors and bleeding, a prospective consecutive high dose group (n=29), and a retrospective low dose group (n=30) who had had ablative and microvascular reconstructive surgery for oral or oropharyngeal cancer. The bleeding index over 5 days (range 40-60) was used as an objective measure of perioperative bleeding. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the bleeding index between the two groups. We found no significant difference in the mean bleeding index between the two groups (p=0.56) (mean (SD) bleeding index in the high dose group 45.3 (26.1), and 48.7 (18.1) in the low dose group). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was -1.51 lower to 0.83 higher in the high dose group. Five patients (2 (7%) in the high dose, and 3 (10%) in the low dose group) were returned to theatre with bleeding complications. There was a trend to a higher failure rate of free flaps in the high dose group (4 (13%) complete, and 1 partial failure compared with 1 (3%) complete and 1 partial failure in the low dose group). There were no symptomatic thromboembolic events in either group. An increased dose of dalteparin did not seem to increase conventional surgical bleeding complications, which was consistent with the null hypothesis at evidence level 2b, but a larger sample is needed to explore its impact on venous thromboembolic events and on the failure of microvascular free flaps.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Dalteparina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Estudos de Coortes , Dalteparina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirurgia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA