In-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.

Introduction: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events including arteriovenous thrombosis, myocarditis and acute myocardial injury. Relevant literature to date has reported widely varying estimates of mortality, ranging from approximately 2 to 11 times higher odds of mortality in COVID-19-positive STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) patients. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to resolve these inconsistencies and assess the impact of COVID-19 infection on mortality and other clinical outcomes in patients presenting with STEMI. Methods: This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021297458) and performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to November 2021 (updated on April 2022) using a search strategy consisting of terms relating to COVID-19, STEMI, and mortality. Results: We identified 435 studies through our initial search. After screening according to our eligibility criteria, a total of 11 studies were included. Compared with the non-COVID-19 STEMI patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in COVID-19-positive STEMI patients. Similarly, the risk of cardiogenic shock was higher in the COVID-19-positive patients. Length of hospital stay was longer in STEMI patients with COVID-19. Conclusions: Our study highlights the necessity for early evaluation of COVID-19 status in all STEMI patients followed by risk stratification, prompt reperfusion and more aggressive management of COVID-19-positive patients. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind poorer prognosis in such patients.

Selecting the Next Generation of Surgeons: General Surgery Program Directors and Coordinators Perspective on USMLE Changes and Holistic Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was designed as a universal assessment tool for states to determine physician's medical licensure's candidacy. Recent changes in the USMLE exam have changed the way future surgical residency candidate applications will be reviewed. The survey aimed to assess the effect of changes in USMLE exams-USMLE Step 1 pass/fail, complete dissolution of USMLE clinical skills exam, and the role of holistic review in future surgical residency candidacy selection. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was created and distributed to general surgery program directors and coordinators across the USA. The survey aimed to assess attitudes toward changes to USMLE exams and the potential changes with a holistic review of candidate applications. RESULTS: The response rate was 63.7%. Most program directors and coordinators disagree with changing USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail scoring system. The majority felt that contacts, the medical school's name, and performance in clinical electives and sub-internships would hold more significance. They also believe that a holistic review of application will decrease socioeconomic discrepancies and promote a more diverse and inclusive resident cohort. CONCLUSION: Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) will gain more importance in future residency matches because of the change in the scoring system of Step 1. The medical school's name, personal contacts, and clinical performance in rotations will hold more significance.

Acute Lobar Nephronia in an infant presented as a renal tumor.

A case report of a 02-month-old infant referred to us with incidental bilateral renal masses on ultrasound, which was reported as nephroblastoma/Wilms tumor on CT scan, no signs, and symptoms of infection. Urine and blood cultures were negative, which led to a percutaneous renal biopsy which showed Acute Lobar Nephronia. The infant was started intravenous antibiotics which resulted in the resolution of bilateral renal masses on serial ultrasounds.

Para-pelvic cyst-an unusual cause of pelviureteric obstruction in a malrotated kidney.

Pelviureteric junction obstruction can be attributed to intrinsic and extrinsic pathologies. We report an unusual cause of pelviureteric junction obstruction due to a large parapelvic cyst in a malrotated kidney. The patient presented with intermittent flank pain. The diagnosis was arrived at following imaging. The cyst was managed by open surgery.

Assessment of red cell distribution width, glycaemic control and diabetes related complications - the ARDENT Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of red cell distribution width with glycaemic control and the presence of complications in diabetes patients. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was done at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from September to November 2017, and comprised patients with type 2 diabetes. Clinical and demographical characteristics were documented and they were subjected to complete blood count, red cell distribution width, glycated haemoglobin, fasting and random blood glucose, lipid profile, urea and creatinine. The presence of complications were assessed during clinical examination. SPSS 20 was used for data analysis.. RESULTS: There were 349 patients with a mean age of 53.14±11.77 years. The mean duration of diabetes was 8.36±6.64 years and mean glycated haemoglobin was 9.05±1.93. Red cell distribution width was significantly associated with the duration of diabetes, hypertension, macrovascular and microvascular complications and extent of glycaemic control (p<0.0001 each). A statistically significant linear relationship was observed between red cell distribution width and the number of macrovascular and microvascular complications (p<0.0001) and glycated haemoglobin (p<0.0001). Mean red cell distribution width was 13.94±1.66, 14.72±1.38, and 15.76±1.55 for optimal control, borderline control and poor control respectively. This linear incremental pattern was statistic ally significant (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The linear association of red cell distribution width with glycated haemoglobin may enable its use as a measure of the extent of hyperglycaemia.

The ADRIFT study - Assessing Diabetes Distress and its associated factors in the Pakistani population.

OBJECTIVE: To assess diabetes distress and its associated factors in Pakistani population.. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted at Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from July to December 2017, and comprised patients of diabetes type 2. After noting down demographic and clinical parameters, diabetes distress of the subjects was measured by applying the 17-item diabetes distress scale which also assesses sub domains like emotional burden, physicianrelated distress, regimen-related distress and interpersonal distress. SPSS 20 was used to analyse data. RESULTS: There were 349 subjects with a mean age of 53.14±11.77 years, mean diabetes duration of 8.36±6.64 years and a mean glycated haemoglobin value of 9.05±1.93%. Mean overall diabetes distress score was 2.55±0.75, signifying moderate distress. Overall, prevalence of diabetes distress was found among 266(76.2%) subjects;164(47%) moderate and 102(29.2%) high level distress. Emotional burden was most substantially elevated, with 296(84.8%) patients reporting moderate to high levels. Total diabetes distress was significantly related to demographic background (p<0.0001), education level (p=0.015), monthly income, frequency of administration of medication, adherence to medical treatment (p<0.05), number of complications (p<0.05) and overall glycaemic control (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable factors, such as frequency of medication and compliance to treatment, should be addressed with the aim of decreasing diabetes distress and improve glycaemic control..