Characteristics and Outcomes of a Single-Centre Cohort of Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients Referred for Heart Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) services increasingly encounter heart failure (HF) in the ageing ACHD population. Optimal timing of referral for heart transplant (HTx) evaluation in this heterogeneous population is complex and ill-defined. We aim to outline the characteristics and outcomes of ACHD patients referred for HTx from a large Australian ACHD centre. METHOD: Retrospective review of ACHD patients referred for HTx from a primary ACHD centre (1992-2021). Database analysis of patient demographics, characteristics, wait-listing, and transplantation outcomes was performed. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients (mean age 37±9.9 years old; 69% male) were referred for HTx with a mean follow-up of 5.9±6.3 years. Of these, 22 of 45 (49%) were listed and transplanted, including one heart-lung transplant. The commonest diagnosis was dextro-transposition of the great arteries (13/45, 29%). Most patients, 33 of 45 (73.3%) had undergone at least one cardiac surgery in childhood. Indications for HTx referral included HF in 34 of 45 (75%), followed by pulmonary hypertension in 7 of 45 (11%). Median transplant wait-list time was 145 days (interquartile range, 112-256). Of the 23 patients not wait-listed, the reasons included clinical stability in 13 of 45 (29%), psychosocial factors in 2 of 45 (4.4%) and prohibitive surgical risk, including multiorgan dysfunction, in 8 of 45 (17.7%). Transplant was of a single organ in most, 21 of 22 (95.5%). Overall mortality was 5 of 22 (22.7%) in those after HTx, and 14 of 23 (60.9%) in those not listed (p=0.0156). CONCLUSIONS: Increasingly, ACHD patients demonstrate the need for advanced HF treatments. HTx decision-making is complex, and increased mortality is seen in those not wait-listed. Ultimately, the referral of ACHD patients for HTx is underpinned by local decision-making and experience, wait-list times and outcomes.

The impact of coronary calcium score as an addition to myocardial perfusion imaging in altering clinical management (ICCAMPA trial).

INTRODUCTION: AIM: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a key tool for the identification and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. The use of a coronary calcium score further adds to prognostic data above MPI alone. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the extent to which the use of a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, when co-reported with MPI, impacts changes in clinical management in patients without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing functional imaging. METHODS: This is a multicenter international study which incorporated a standardized questionnaire to evaluate changes in clinician management after MPI results were given with and without the additional information of a CAC score. Calcium scoring on a SPECT-CT system was performed via a semiquantitative Shemesh score (0-12) with a 0-3 score from the left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. CT of the chest was read independently, and non-coronary findings were reported alongside the CAC score. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were enrolled across 3 international centers (Brazil, Australia, New Zealand). Of the 281 patients, 133 (47%) had management altered after the clinician was made aware of the CAC score. The impact of the CAC in changing clinical management was significant, particularly in patients with a negative MPI (P < 0.0001), but also in MPI-positive patients (P = 0.0021). The most common management change was the addition or intensification of statin therapy. CONCLUSION: The addition of the CAC component to MPI yielded significant management changes in nearly half of all patients undergoing MPI for suspected CAD. This trend was observed across all centers in the three countries involved and was particularly evident in patient with a negative MPI.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Case Series from a Tertiary Centre.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of non-atherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome (ACS). As it is more commonly seen in young women, the diagnosis can be missed. Current evidence is based on case reports and retrospective studies with no consensus recommendations on immediate management and long-term follow-up. We present a case series of four patients to outline clinical presentation, prognosis and long-term management of this rare clinical entity.