Patient Navigation by Community Health Workers Increases Access to Surgical Care in Rural Haiti.

INTRODUCTION: In the Hôpital Albert Schweitzer district in rural Haiti, patients from mountain areas receive fewer operations per capita than patients from the plains. Possible additional barriers for mountain patients include lower socioeconomic status, lack of awareness of financial support, illiteracy and unfamiliarity with the hospital system. We sought to increase the rate of elective surgery for a mountain population using a patient navigation program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient navigators were trained to guide subjects from a mountain population through the entire hospital process for elective surgery. We compared the rate of elective operations before and after the patient navigation intervention between three groups: a control group from a mountainous area, a control group from the plains and an intervention group from a mountainous area. RESULTS: The baseline elective operation rate differed significantly between the plains control group, the mountain control group and the mountain intervention group (361 vs. 57 vs. 68 operations per 100,000 population per year). The rate of elective surgery between the two mountain groups was not statistically different prior to the intervention. After the intervention, the elective operation rate in the mountain group that received patient navigation increased from 68 to 131 operations per 100,000 population per year (p = 0.017). DISCUSSION: Patient navigation doubled the elective operation rate for a mountain population in rural Haiti. While additional barriers to access remain for this vulnerable population, patient navigation is an essential augmentation to financial assistance programs to ensure that the poor gain access to surgical care.

The struggle for equity: an examination of surgical services at two NGO hospitals in rural Haiti.

BACKGROUND: Health systems must deliver care equitably to serve the poor. Both L'Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS) and L'Hôpital Bon Sauveur (HBS) have longstanding commitments to provide equitable surgical care in rural Haiti. HAS charges fees that reflect a preference for the rural population near the hospital, with free care available for the poorest. HBS does not charge fees. The two hospitals are otherwise similar in surgical capacity and rural location. Using geography as a proxy for poverty, we analysed the equity achieved under the financial system at both hospitals. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operative case-logs for general surgery and orthopaedic cases at both hospitals from June 1, to Aug 31, 2012. The records were compared by total number of operations, geographic distribution of patients, and number of elective operations. The service areas were defined as the governmental administrative units closest to both hospitals. For HAS, we analysed the number of operations performed on patients from the most poor and least poor regions within the service area; similarly detailed geographic information was not available from HBS. Rates were compared with χ(2) tests. The Ethics Committees at both hospitals and the Institutional Review Board at Partners Healthcare approved the study. FINDINGS: Patients from the rural service area received 306 operations (86·2%) at HAS compared with 149 (38·1%) at HBS (p<0·0001). Only 16 operations (4·5%) at HAS were performed on patients from outside the service area for elective conditions compared with 179 (47·0%) at HBS (p<0·0001). Within its rural service area, HAS performed fewer operations on patients from the most destitute areas compared with other locations (4·0 operations per 10 000 population vs 10·1 operations per 10 000 population; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Use of fees as part of an equity strategy will likely disadvantage the poorest patients, while providing care without fees might encourage patients to travel from urban areas that contain other hospitals. Health systems striving to serve the poor should continually evaluate and seek to improve equity, even within systems that provide free care. FUNDING: None.