RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a cluster-randomized, shared decision-making (SDM) trial offering lifestyle change, metformin, or both options, to adults at risk for diabetes in a primary care network (n = 20 practices). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used propensity score matching to identify control patients and used electronic health record data to compare weight loss at 24 and 36 months of follow-up and diabetes incidence at 36 months of follow-up. RESULTS: In adjusted post hoc analyses, SDM participants (n = 489) maintained modestly greater 24-month weight loss of -3.1 lb and 36-month weight loss of -2.7 lb versus controls (n = 1,430, both comparisons P < 0.001). SDM participants who chose both lifestyle change and metformin sustained weight loss at 36 months of -4.1 lb (P < 0.001 vs. controls). We found no differences in incident diabetes (15% of SDM participants, 14% of control participants; P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to demonstrate weight loss maintenance up to 36 months after diabetes prevention SDM.
Assuntos
Metformina , Estado Pré-Diabético , Adulto , Humanos , Estado Pré-Diabético/tratamento farmacológico , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Redução de Peso , Estilo de Vida , Tomada de Decisões , Participação do PacienteRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify structural factors associated with the receipt of mental health care treatment among Black women in California during pregnancy and after childbirth. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the population-based Listening to Mothers in California survey. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 194 non-Latina Black women in the postpartum period. METHODS: We used descriptive statistics, including differences between means and logistic regression, to conduct a series of bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Most respondents (84.4%, n = 163) reported symptoms of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders prenatally, and half (50% n = 97) reported symptoms of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders in the postpartum period. Only 12.3% to 14.6% of those who reported symptoms received mental health care treatment. Furthermore, 21.2% (n = 38) of respondents were not screened for postpartum depression. Respondents with private insurance coverage were more likely to report receipt of mental health care after childbirth (OR = 4.6; 95% confidence interval [1.5, 13.5]) compared to respondents with public insurance coverage. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a high prevalence of unmet mental health needs among non-Latina Black women who lived in California during the perinatal period. Practitioners in clinical settings may be more likely to make referrals to mental health care for women with private insurance coverage in the postpartum period.
Assuntos
Depressão Pós-Parto , Saúde Mental , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/terapia , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , California/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Depressão/psicologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: While the Diabetes Prevention Program Study demonstrated that intensive lifestyle change and metformin both reduce type 2 diabetes incidence, there are little data on patient preferences in real-world, clinical settings. METHODS: The Prediabetes Informed Decisions and Education (PRIDE) study was a cluster-randomized trial of shared decision making (SDM) for diabetes prevention. In PRIDE, pharmacists engaged patients with prediabetes in SDM using a decision aid with information about both evidence-based options. We recorded which diabetes prevention option(s) participants chose after the SDM visit. We also evaluated logistic regression models examining predictors of choosing intensive lifestyle change ± metformin, compared to metformin or usual care, and predictors of choosing metformin ± intensive lifestyle change, compared to intensive lifestyle change or usual care. RESULTS: Among PRIDE participants (n = 515), 55% chose intensive lifestyle change, 8.5% chose metformin, 15% chose both options, and 21.6% declined both options. Women (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60, P = 0.023) had higher odds than men of choosing intensive lifestyle change. Patients >60 years old (OR = 0.50, P = 0.028) had lower odds than patients <50 years old of choosing metformin. Participants with higher body mass index (BMI) had higher odds of choosing intensive lifestyle change (OR = 1.07 per BMI unit increase, P = 0.005) v. other options and choosing metformin (OR = 1.06 per BMI unit increase, P = 0.008) v. other options. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prediabetes are making choices for diabetes prevention that generally align with recommendations and expected benefits from the published literature. Our results are important for policy makers and clinicians, as well as program planners developing systemwide approaches for diabetes prevention.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Metformina , Estado Pré-Diabético , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Pré-Diabético/tratamento farmacológicoAssuntos
Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Polícia , Atenção à Saúde , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , ViolênciaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Intensive lifestyle change (e.g., the Diabetes Prevention Program) and metformin reduce type 2 diabetes risk among patients with prediabetes. However, real-world uptake remains low. Shared decision-making (SDM) may increase awareness and help patients select and follow through with informed options for diabetes prevention that are aligned with their preferences. OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a prediabetes SDM intervention. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty primary care clinics within a large regional health system. PARTICIPANTS: Overweight/obese adults with prediabetes (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 and HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) were enrolled from 10 SDM intervention clinics. Propensity score matching was used to identify control patients from 10 usual care clinics. INTERVENTION: Intervention clinic patients were invited to participate in a face-to-face SDM visit with a pharmacist who used a decision aid (DA) to describe prediabetes and four possible options for diabetes prevention: DPP, DPP ± metformin, metformin only, or usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary endpoint was uptake of DPP (≥ 9 sessions), metformin, or both strategies at 4 months. Secondary endpoint was weight change (lbs.) at 12 months. RESULTS: Uptake of DPP and/or metformin was higher among SDM participants (n = 351) than controls receiving usual care (n = 1028; 38% vs. 2%, p < .001). At 12-month follow-up, adjusted weight loss (lbs.) was greater among SDM participants than controls (- 5.3 vs. - 0.2, p < .001). LIMITATIONS: Absence of DPP supplier participation data for matched patients in usual care clinics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A prediabetes SDM intervention led by pharmacists increased patient engagement in evidence-based options for diabetes prevention and was associated with significantly greater uptake of DPP and/or metformin at 4 months and weight loss at 12 months. Prediabetes SDM may be a promising approach to enhance prevention efforts among patients at increased risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at clinicaltrails.gov (NCT02384109)).