Quantification of infarct core volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke using cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) in CT perfusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) is considered a robust marker of the infarct core in 15°-tracer- based positron emission tomography. We aimed to delineate the infarct core in patients with acute ischemic stroke using commonly used relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) < 30% and oxygen metabolism parameter of CMRO2 on CT perfusion in comparison with pre-treatment diffusion- weighted imaging (DWI)-derived infarct core volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The CMRO2 and CBF maps in CT perfusion were automatically generated using post-processing software. The infarct core volume was quantified with relative (r) CMRO2 < 20% - 30% and rCBF < 30%. The optimal threshold was defined as those that demonstrated the smallest mean absolute error, lowest mean infarct core volume difference, narrowest 95% limit of agreement, and largest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) against the DWI. RESULTS: This study included 76 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 69.97 ± 12.15 years, 43 males). The optimal thresholds of rCMRO2 < 26% resulted in the lowest mean infarct core volume difference, narrowest 95% limit of agreement, and largest ICC among different thresholds. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a volumetric bias of 1.96 mL between DWI and rCMRO2 < 26%, whereas in cases of DWI and rCBF < 30%, the bias was notably larger at 14.10 mL. The highest correlation was observed for rCMRO2 < 26% (ICC=0.936), whereas rCBF < 30% showed a slightly lower ICC of 0.934. CONCLUSIONS: CT perfusion-derived CMRO2 is a promising parameter for estimating the infarct core volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke. ABBREVIATIONS: CMRO2 = cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Quantification of Altered Vascular Permeability in Autoimmune Encephalitis.

Background Blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability change is a possible pathologic mechanism of autoimmune encephalitis. Purpose To evaluate the change in BBB permeability in patients with autoimmune encephalitis as compared with healthy controls by using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and to explore its predictive value for treatment response in patients. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients with probable or possible autoimmune encephalitis and healthy controls who underwent DCE MRI between April 2020 and May 2021. Automatic volumetric segmentation was performed on three-dimensional T1-weighted images, and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) values were calculated at encephalitis-associated brain regions. Ktrans values were compared between the patients and controls, with adjustment for age and sex with use of a nonparametric approach. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to compare Ktrans values of the good (improvement in modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of at least two points or achievement of an mRS score of ≤2) and poor (improvement in mRS score of less than two points and achievement of an mRS score >2) treatment response groups among the patients. Results Thirty-eight patients with autoimmune encephalitis (median age, 38 years [IQR, 29-59 years]; 20 [53%] female) and 17 controls (median age, 71 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 12 [71%] female) were included. All brain regions showed higher Ktrans values in patients as compared with controls (P < .001). The median difference in Ktrans between the patients and controls was largest in the right parahippocampal gyrus (25.1 × 10-4 min-1 [95% CI: 17.6, 43.4]). Among patients, the poor treatment response group had higher baseline Ktrans values in both cerebellar cortices (P = .03), the left cerebellar cortex (P = .02), right cerebellar cortex (P = .045), left cerebral cortex (P = .045), and left postcentral gyrus (P = .03) than the good treatment response group. Conclusion DCE MRI demonstrated that BBB permeability was increased in all brain regions in patients with autoimmune encephalitis as compared with controls, and baseline Ktrans values were higher in patients with poor treatment response in the cerebellar cortex, left cerebral cortex, and left postcentral gyrus as compared with the good response group. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Filippi and Rocca in this issue.

Absence of enhancement in a lesion does not preclude primary central nervous system T-cell lymphoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma that originates in the central nervous system (CNS) and is exclusively limited to the CNS. Although most PCNSLs are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, primary CNS T-cell lymphomas (PCNSTLs) are rare. PCNSTLs typically demonstrate some degree of enhancement on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To the best of our knowledge, non-enhancing PCNSTL has not been reported previously. CASE SUMMARY: A 69-year-old male presented to the neurology department with complaints of mild cognitive impairment and gradual onset of left lower leg weakness over a span of two weeks. Initial MRI showed asymmetric T2-hyperintense lesions within the brain. No enhancement was observed on the contrast-enhanced T1 image. The initial diagnosis was neuro-Behçet's disease. Despite high-dose steroid therapy, no alterations in the lesions were identified on initial MRI. The patient's symptoms deteriorated further. An MRI performed one month after the initial scan revealed an increased lesion extent. Subsequently, brain biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of PCNSTL. The patient underwent definitive combined chemo-radiotherapy. However, the patient developed bacteremia and died of septic shock approximately three months after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The absence of enhancement in the lesion did not rule out PCNSTL. A biopsy approach is advisable for pathological confirmation.

Validation of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography-Based Risk Stratification System and Biopsy Criteria for Cervical Lymph Nodes in Preoperative Patients With Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the risk stratification system (RSS) and biopsy criteria for cervical lymph nodes (LNs) proposed by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included a consecutive series of preoperative patients with thyroid cancer who underwent LN biopsy, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) between December 2006 and June 2015. LNs were categorized as probably benign, indeterminate, or suspicious according to the current US- and CT-based RSS and the size thresholds for cervical LN biopsy as suggested by the KSThR. The diagnostic performance and unnecessary biopsy rates were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 277 LNs (53.1% metastatic) in 228 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 47.4 years ± 14) were analyzed. In US, the malignancy risks were significantly different among the three categories (all P < 0.001); however, CT-detected probably benign and indeterminate LNs showed similarly low malignancy risks (P = 0.468). The combined US + CT criteria stratified the malignancy risks among the three categories (all P < 0.001) and reduced the proportion of indeterminate LNs (from 20.6% to 14.4%) and the malignancy risk in the indeterminate LNs (from 31.6% to 12.5%) compared with US alone. In all image-based classifications, nodal size did not affect the malignancy risks (short diameter [SD] ≤ 5 mm LNs vs. SD > 5 mm LNs, P ≥ 0.177). The criteria covering only suspicious LNs showed higher specificity and lower unnecessary biopsy rates than the current criteria, while maintaining sensitivity in all imaging modalities. CONCLUSION: Integrative evaluation of US and CT helps in reducing the proportion of indeterminate LNs and the malignancy risk among them. Nodal size did not affect the malignancy risk of LNs, and the addition of indeterminate LNs to biopsy candidates did not have an advantage in detecting LN metastases in all imaging modalities.

A flare of Still's disease following COVID-19 vaccination in a 34-year-old patient.

Vaccination is a cornerstone for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection during a pandemic. Although the currently used COVID-19 vaccine is considered safe, some concerns persist regarding the likelihood of flares of rheumatic diseases. Still's disease is a rare auto-inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology, and the data on the flare of Still's disease following COVID-19 vaccination are limited. Therefore, we hereby present the case of a 34-year-old female patient with Still's disease who experienced a flare after a ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. The patient visited the emergency department complaining of fever, arthralgia, myalgia, pleuritic chest pain and macular salmon-pink rash on her back for the past 2 days. She had maintained low Still's disease activity with etanercept and low-dose glucocorticoid for 14 years. She received the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 7 days before the flare. Laboratory investigations revealed leucocytosis and elevated serum levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and ferritin. Computed tomography showed no specific findings. She received methylprednisolone pulse therapy, etanercept, and methotrexate for treating the Still's disease flare. However, her symptoms were not fully controlled, and she developed pericarditis, pleuritis, fever and macular rashes expanding to her extremities. After excluding infectious conditions by blood culture and pleural fluid analysis, we administered tocilizumab with methotrexate and prednisolone. Her symptoms and laboratory findings improved significantly, and she was discharged without symptoms 7 days later. Although rare, this case of a patient with Still's disease undergoing a flare following vaccination suggests that close observation of disease activity is warranted following COVID-19 vaccination.

[Dilatation of Superior Ophthalmic Vein and Visual Disturbance by Central Venous Stenosis: A Case Mimicking Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistula]. / ìƒì•ˆì •ë§¥ 확장 및 ì‹œë ¥ ì €í•˜ë¥¼ 보인 ì¤‘ì‹¬ì •ë§¥í˜‘ì°©: 해면경막 ë™ì •ë§¥ë£¨ë¡œ 오인된 증례 ë³´ê³ .

Central venous stenosis is a relatively common complication in hemodialysis patients; however, jugular venous reflux (JVR) and increased intracranial pressure are rare, and associated progressive visual disturbance was reported in only a few cases. Here, we report a case of JVR with visual disturbance and increased intracranial pressure. Notably, the MRI was accompanied by a dilatation of the superior ophthalmic vein, which was mistaken for a cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CSdAVF). The patient had JVR on time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) and severe stenosis of the left brachiocephalic vein on conventional angiography. After balloon angioplasty for central venous stenosis, he was discharged after improvement of his visual disturbance. Although JVR due to central venous stenosis and CSdAVF might show similar symptoms, treatment plans are different. Therefore, it is important to distinguish radiologically based on a thorough review of MRI and TOF-MRA and confirm the central venous stenosis on cerebral angiography for the accurate diagnosis.

Analysis of anesthesia-related medical disputes in the 2009-2014 period using the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists database.

Using the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists database of anesthesia-related medical disputes (July 2009-June 2014), causative mechanisms and injury patterns were analyzed. In total, 105 cases were analyzed. Most patients were aged < 60 yr (82.9%) and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≤ II (90.5%). In 42.9% of all cases, the injuries were determined to be 'avoidable' if the appropriate standard of care had been applied. Sedation was the sec most common type of anesthesia (37.1% of all cases), following by general anesthesia. Most sedation cases (27/39, 69.2%) showed a common lack of vigilance: no pre-procedural testing (82.1%), absence of anesthesia record (89.7%), and non-use of intra-procedural monitoring (15.4%). Most sedation (92.3%) was provided simultaneously by the non-anesthesiologists who performed the procedures. After the resulting injuries were grouped into four categories (temporary, permanent/minor, permanent/major, and death), their causative mechanisms were analyzed in cases with permanent injuries (n=20) and death (n=82). A 'respiratory events' was the leading causative mechanism (56/102, 54.9%). Of these, the most common specific mechanism was hypoxia secondary to airway obstruction or respiratory depression (n=31). The sec most common damaging event was a 'cardiovascular events' (26/102, 25.5%), in which myocardial infarction was the most common specific mechanism (n=12). Our database analysis demonstrated several typical injury profiles (a lack of vigilance in seemingly safe procedures or sedation, non-compliance with the airway management guidelines, and the prevalence of myocardial infarction) and can be helpful to improve patient safety.

Analysis of expert consultation referrals to the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (KSA): a comparison of procedural sedation and general anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Procedural sedation during diagnostic or therapeutic procedures is currently widely used by clinicians across a broad range of specialties. However, procedural sedation is a poorly controlled practice in many countries, often performed in potentially unsafe environments. METHODS: In 2009, the Legislation Committee of the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, based on expert consultation referrals provided by police departments, civil courts, and criminal courts, initiated the construction of database to compile all anesthesia-related adverse events. Using this database (July 2009 to April 2012), we have compared causative mechanisms and injury patterns in procedural sedation (Sedation) cases (N = 25) with those in general anesthesia (GA) cases (N = 29). RESULTS: The severity of injury in Sedation cases was similar to that in GA cases, with death occurring in 72.0 % of cases. Hypoxia secondary to airway obstruction or respiratory depression was the most common specific mechanism of Sedation-related injuries (64.0 %). In-depth analysis of pre-procedural evaluation and intraoperative monitoring revealed a common lack of vigilance in the Sedation cases, and most injuries were judged as preventable with better monitoring. Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) was performed in the great majority of Sedation cases (88.0 %). CONCLUSION: Our analysis of procedural sedation based on anesthesia-related adverse events compiled in the national database revealed a high severity of patient injury similar to that due to general anesthesia. Most procedural sedations were shown to be poorly controlled without adequate pre-procedural patient evaluation or intraoperative monitoring. Thus, it is essential to establish proper practical guidelines for procedural sedation and ensure strict adherence to these guidelines, especially during the NAAP.