RESUMO
Background/Objectives: Given the limited success in treating functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) through conventional methods, there is a pressing need for tailored treatments that account for the heterogeneity and biopsychosocial factors associated with FGIDs. Here, we considered the potential of novel subtypes of FGIDs based on biopsychosocial information. Methods: We collected data from 198 FGID patients utilizing an integrative approach that included the traditional Korean medicine diagnosis questionnaire for digestive symptoms (KM), as well as the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), alongside the conventional Rome-criteria-based Korean Bowel Disease Questionnaire (K-BDQ). Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess whether KM or SF-36 provided additional information beyond the K-BDQ and its statistical relevance to symptom severity. Questions related to symptom severity were selected using an extremely randomized trees (ERT) regressor to develop an integrative questionnaire. For the identification of novel subtypes, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection and spectral clustering were used for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and clustering, respectively. The validity of the clusters was assessed using certain metrics, such as trustworthiness, silhouette coefficient, and accordance rate. An ERT classifier was employed to further validate the clustered result. Results: The multivariate analyses revealed that SF-36 and KM supplemented the psychosocial aspects lacking in K-BDQ. Through the application of nonlinear clustering using the integrative questionnaire data, four subtypes of FGID were identified: mild, severe, mind-symptom predominance, and body-symptom predominance. Conclusions: The identification of these subtypes offers a framework for personalized treatment strategies, thus potentially enhancing therapeutic outcomes by tailoring interventions to the unique biopsychosocial profiles of FGID patients.
RESUMO
Background: Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has been widely utilized in the management of trigeminal neuralgia. Despite using image guidance, accurate needle positioning into the target area still remains a critical element for achieving a successful outcome. This study was performed to precisely clarify the anatomical information required to ensure that the electrode tip is placed on the sensory component of the mandibular nerve (MN) at the foramen ovale (FO) level. Methods: The study used 50 hemi-half heads from 26 South Korean adult cadavers. Results: The cross-sectioned anterior and posterior divisions of the MN at the FO level could be distinguished based on an irregular boundary and color difference. The anterior division was clearly brighter than the posterior one. The anterior division of the MN at the FO level was located at the whole anterior (38.0%), anteromedial (6.0%), anterior center (8.0%), and anterolateral (22.0%) parts. The posterior division was often located at the whole posterior or posterolateral parts of the MN at the FO level. The anterior divisions covered the whole MN except for the medial half of the posterolateral part in the overwrapped images of the cross-sectional areas of the MN at the FO level. The cross-sectional areas of the anterior divisions were similar in males and females, whereas those of the posterior divisions were significantly larger in males (P = 0.004). Conclusions: The obtained anatomical information is expected to help physicians reduce unwanted side effects after percutaneous RFTC within the FO for the MN.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program in improving sleep in cancer survivors. METHODS: Four electronic databases (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and PsycARTICLES) were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of MBSR on the sleep of cancer survivors from their inception to May 2020. The primary outcome was sleep quality measured by validated questionnaires such as the Insomnia Severity Index and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The secondary outcomes were sleep parameters obtained from a sleep diary, polysomnography, and actigraphy. The included studies were critically appraised by the Cochrane risk of bias tool and meta-analyzed. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, and nine studies were analyzed quantitatively. MBSR significantly improved sleep quality compared to usual care (standardized mean difference -0.29, 95 % confidence interval -0.55 to -0.04, I2 = 58 %). However, there were no favorable results with sleep parameters. Compared to active controls, MBSR presented mixed results with sleep quality according to the outcomes and negative results with sleep parameters. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that MBSR helps cancer survivors improve sleep quality. Our results support the possibility of using MBSR for cancer survivors. However, its efficacy and effectiveness in improving sleep quality and sleep parameters are inconclusive because the number of included studies was few with inconsistent results. Further studies with high methodological quality are required to establish conclusive evidence about the efficacy and effectiveness of MBSR in improving sleep quality and sleep parameters in cancer survivors.