RESUMO
For antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening, the gold standard method is an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) using HEp-2 cells, and a serial dilution test is needed to determine the endpoint titer. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated endpoint titer (eEPT) by the NOVA View system, by comparing it with the EPT by the serial dilution method (dEPT). The endpoint titers of a total of 1518 ANA positive cases with five major patterns including speckled, homogeneous, centromere, nucleolar, and nuclear dots patterns were determined using both the estimation function and the serial dilution method by the NOVA View system. A significant correlation between the light intensity unit (LIU) values and dEPTs was identified in all five patterns with high ρ values, ranging from 0.666 to 0.832. However, the overall exact match rate between dEPT and eEPT was 22.1% (336/1518), with the ±one-titer match rate being highest in the centromere pattern (62.8%, 81/129), and lowest in the homogeneous pattern (37.6%, 200/532). This suggests that while LIU values correlate well with dEPT, there are discrepancies in numerical agreement. Most cases that did not show an exact match, showed one-to-three-titer overestimations by eEPT. Therefore, adjusting eEPT downward significantly improved the concordance rates with dEPTs. Further investigation for an appropriate cutoff of LIU values for determining eEPT should be performed for clinical application and contribution to the standardization of the ANA titer.
RESUMO
Graves' disease (GD) is caused by autoantibodies against the thyrotropin receptor (TRAb), and among the three types of TRAbs, only the stimulating type (TSI) is known to be associated with GD. In this study, we evaluated the analytical performance of a new fully automated chemiluminescent TSI immunoassay, namely, the Immulite TSI assay, and compared the diagnostic efficacy of the assay with the Elecsys Anti-TSH receptor (TSHR) assay. Precision was evaluated using two levels of quality control reagents, and linearity was evaluated across the expected analytical measurement range (0.18-37.35 IU/L) at five levels using clinical samples. A comparative evaluation between the two assays was performed using 187 clinical samples, and the concordance of qualitative results was also assessed. The repeatability and total imprecision (% coefficient of variation) of the Immulite TSI assay were 3.19% and 3.46% at 0.93 IU/L, and 3.76% and 5.42% at 19.3 IU/L, respectively. The linearity of this assay ranged from 0.16 to 6.17 IU/L. A high degree of correlation was observed between quantitative values from each assay (correlation coefficient = 0.819). Moderate agreement between methods was observed with an overall qualitative agreement of 93.0%. Among 13 cases with discordant qualitative results, the Immulite TSI assay generated more favorable results consistent with clinical diagnoses of patients than the Elecsys Anti-TSHR assay. The Immulite TSI assay showed reliable analytical performance and good correlation with the Elecsys Anti-TSHR assay and we expect this method will be helpful for clinicians to evaluate patients with hyperthyroidism.