The New Urology Match: How Recent Innovations Including Virtual Interviews and Preference Signaling Have Changed Match Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how recent changes in the urology match occurring from 2021 to 2023, including virtual interviews (VIs) and preference signals (PS), affected match outcomes. METHODS: The American Urological Association (AUA) match data from 2021 to 2023 was compared to the 15 years prior. This was obtained from the AUA website and a previous study of public AUA match data. Self-reported applicant characteristics and outcomes from the Urology Residency Applicant Spreadsheet 2021-2023 were compared to the four years prior. RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2023, residency programs offered 43 interviews each, compared to an average of 35 in the 15 years prior. Programs have been receiving more applications each year, from a low of 225 in 2019 to a peak of 347 in 2022. This resulted in an interview offer rate of 13% between 2021 and 2023, compared to 16% in the five years prior. Applicants applied to a mean of 88 programs in 2023, increasing each year since 40 in 2006. Applicants attended 12 interviews on average between 2021 and 2023, compared to 13 in the two years prior. Self-reported applicant data similarly demonstrated that, compared to the four years prior, applicants between 2021 and 2023 applied to more programs (81 vs. 70), had a lower interview offer rate (22% vs. 32%), and a higher interview acceptance rate (90% vs. 75%). CONCLUSIONS: During the years with VIs, programs offered more interviews and applicants attended fewer on average, indicating a larger applicant pool was interviewed. Despite the introduction of PS, applicants applied to more programs in 2022 and 2023 than ever before.

The value of residency program characteristics changes throughout urology training.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine which characteristics of urology residency programs are most highly valued by medical students and residents, and how these change during training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We distributed a survey to urology residents and medical students interested in urology via program director email and social media. The survey collected demographic data, future career plans, and asked respondents to rank the relative importance of six categories of residency program characteristics and specific characteristics within each category. RESULTS: Among the six categories of residency characteristics, resident experience was ranked most important by both medical students and residents, followed by geography and clinical experience which were tied. Medical students ranked clinic experience and formal mentorship with greater importance while residents placed higher value on the active role of clinical faculty and help from advanced practice providers. Trainees planning for an academic career ranked research experiences and resident diversity as more important than those entering private practice. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and medical students mostly agreed on the relative importance of residency program characteristics. The differences observed suggest that as trainees gain experience they place greater importance on informal relationships with faculty and value characteristics that enhance surgical training such as support from advanced practice providers and less time in clinic. These findings may guide programs on what information to include on their websites and presentations.