[Meta Analysis on Yield Effect of Biochar for Staple Crops in China].

In order to quantitatively evaluate the impact of biochar on the yield of staple crops in China, a total of 866 pairs of data from 116 published studies were collected. Meta analysis was used to quantitatively analyze the impact of biochar on the yield of staple crops in China and its influencing factors. Meanwhile, a structural equation model (SEM) was constructed to further explain the interaction among the factors. The results showed that compared with no biochar application, biochar application could improve the physical and chemical properties of the soil in the main grain fields and increase the yield of the main grain crops, with an average yield increase rate of 8.77%. Among them, when the pH of biochar was 7-8, the average yield increase rate was the highest, reaching 26.49%. When C/N<60, the average yield increase rate was 13.73%, which was significantly higher than that of C/N≥60. Applying biochar to acidic or neutral soil could give full play to its yield-increasing effect. When the amount of carbon applied was 10-20 t·hm-2, the average yield increase rate of wheat and corn was the highest. The average yield of rice was the highest when the amount of carbon was 15-25 t·hm-2. However, the yield-increasing rates of rice with different carbon application levels were similar, so it is possible to consider losing part of the yield and give consideration to the economic benefits by appropriate reduction. In addition, the yield-increasing effect of biochar decreased with the increase in application years, and generally the yield-increasing effect was not significant after three years. The SEM showed that the application amount of biochar not only directly affected the yield of staple crops but also indirectly affected the yield of staple crops by improving soil fertility, whereas biochar C/N and pH only affected the yield of staple crops by improving soil fertility. Therefore, in the future application of biochar, priority should be given to applying it to acidic or neutral soil with low fertility, and its C/N and pH should be controlled below 60 and 7-8, respectively. Soil conditions, biochar characteristics, and field management measures should be comprehensively considered to maximize the yield of staple crops. This research can provide scientific basis and theoretical basis for the popularization and rational application of biochar.

XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open-labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX).

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC. METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in progression-free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5-6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0-6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812-1.203; Pnon-inferiority = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health-related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This non-inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first-line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children with symptomatic pancreaticobiliary maljunction: A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been widely used in pediatric patients with cholangiopancreatic diseases. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up results of ERCP in symptomatic pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted on 75 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with PBM and underwent therapeutic ERCP at three endoscopy centers between January 2008 and March 2019. They were divided into four PBM groups based on the fluoroscopy in ERCP. Their clinical characteristics, specific ERCP procedures, adverse events, and long-term follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Totally, 112 ERCPs were performed on the 75 children with symptomatic PBM. Clinical manifestations included abdominal pain (62/75, 82.7%), vomiting (35/75, 46.7%), acholic stool (4/75, 5.3%), fever (3/75, 4.0%), acute pancreatitis (47/75, 62.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (13/75, 17.3%), and elevated liver enzymes (22/75, 29.3%). ERCP interventions included endoscopic sphincterotomy, endoscopic retrograde biliary or pancreatic drainage, stone extraction, etc. Procedure-related complications were observed in 12 patients and included post-ERCP pancreatitis (9/75, 12.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (1/75, 1.3%), and infection (2/75, 2.7%). During a mean follow-up period of 46 mo (range: 2 to 134 mo), ERCP therapy alleviated the biliary obstruction and reduced the incidence of pancreatitis. The overall effective rate of ERCP therapy was 82.4%; seven patients (9.3%) were lost to follow-up, eight (11.8%) re-experienced pancreatitis, and eleven (16.2%) underwent radical surgery, known as prophylactic excision of the extrahepatic bile duct and hepaticojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: ERCP is a safe and effective treatment option to relieve biliary or pancreatic obstruction in symptomatic PBM, with the characteristics of minor trauma, fewer complications, and repeatability.

[GRP78 expression in gastric cancer and its clinical significance].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical value of the expression of glucose regulated protein 78 (GRP78) for assessment of severity, chemoresistance and prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma ( GC) . METHODS: A cohort of 237 patients with gastric cancer was included in this study. 160 patients of them were treated by D2 radical gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The GRP78 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry and 80 patients of them were tested in vitro for cancer chemosensitivity by ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). In addition, the relationships were analyzed between GRP78 and age, gender, tumor differentiation, invasion, disease stage, lymph node metastasis and chemoresistance as well as disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The positive rate of GRP78 expression in the gastric adenocarcinoma was 68.8% before the initiation of chemotherapy. The positive GRP78 expression was significantly correlated with tumor invasion depth, poor differentiation, TNM stages, and lymph node metastasis (all P < 0.05), not correlated with gender and age, and high GRP78 expression was associated with the chemoresistance of the gastric cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Negative GRP78 expression was associated with higher sensitivity to both drugs and regimens. The DFS of GRP78-positive group and GRP78-negative group was (53.6 ± 0.9) months and (38.3 ± 0.8) months, respectively (P = 0.041). Interestingly, subgroup analysis revealed that the DFS in GRP78-negative and-positive patients treated with taxane-containing chemotherapy was (58.6 ± 2.6) months and (49.1 ± 2.7) months, respectively, but the difference was statistically not significant (P = 0.111). In contrast, in the subset of GRP78-negative and- positive patients treated with taxane-containing regimens, the DFS was (45.5 ± 1.9) months and (35.1 ± 2.2) months, respectively, showing a significant difference (P = 0.038). In the group of patients with positive GRP78 expression, the patients treated with taxane-containing chemotherapy had a longer DFS [(49.1 ± 2.7) months] than those without that treatment [(35.1 ± 2.2) months], showing a significant difference (P = 0.017). Univariate analysis revealed that DFS was correlated with histological grade, GRP78 expression and lymph node metastasis (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that GRP78 expression and TNM staging were independent influencing factors for gastric cancer (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that GRP78 may be a novel biomarker for assessment of malignant degree and prediction of chemoresistance in gastric cancer, and may be helpful to chemotherapy planning and prognosis prediction in patients with gastric cancer.