RESUMO
Since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, numerous researches and studies have focused on the long-term effects of COVID infection. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) implemented an additional code into the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) for reporting 'Post COVID-19 condition, unspecified (U09.9)' effective on October 1st 2021, representing that Long COVID is a real illness with potential chronic conditions. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) provides researchers with abundant electronic health records (EHR) data by aggregating and harmonizing EHR data across different clinical organizations in the United States, making it convenient to build up a survival analysis on Long COVID patients and non Long COVID patients among large amounts of COVID positive patients.
RESUMO
Recently, an exciting experimental conclusion in Li et al. (Knowl Inf Syst 62(2):611-637, 1) about measures of uncertainty for knowledge bases has attracted great research interest for many scholars. However, these efforts lack solid theoretical interpretations for the experimental conclusion. The main limitation of their research is that the final experimental conclusions are only derived from experiments on three datasets, which makes it still unknown whether the conclusion is universal. In our work, we first review the mathematical theories, definitions, and tools for measuring the uncertainty of knowledge bases. Then, we provide a series of rigorous theoretical proofs to reveal the reasons for the superiority of using the knowledge amount of knowledge structure to measure the uncertainty of the knowledge bases. Combining with experiment results, we verify that knowledge amount has much better performance for measuring uncertainty of knowledge bases. Hence, we prove an empirical conclusion established through experiments from a mathematical point of view. In addition, we find that for some knowledge bases that cannot be classified by entity attributes, such as ProBase (a probabilistic taxonomy), our conclusion is still applicable. Therefore, our conclusions have a certain degree of universality and interpretability and provide a theoretical basis for measuring the uncertainty of many different types of knowledge bases, and the findings of this study have a number of important implications for future practice.
RESUMO
It is shown that various symptoms could remain in the stage of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), otherwise known as Long COVID. A number of COVID patients suffer from heterogeneous symptoms, which severely impact recovery from the pandemic. While scientists are trying to give an unambiguous definition of Long COVID, efforts in prediction of Long COVID could play an important role in understanding the characteristic of this new disease. Vital measurements (e.g. oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure) could reflect body's most basic functions and are measured regularly during hospitalization, so among patients diagnosed COVID positive and hospitalized, we analyze the vital measurements of first 7 days since the hospitalization start date to study the pattern of the vital measurements and predict Long COVID with the information from vital measurements.