Pharmacokinetic Variability of Sulthiame: The Impact of Age, Drug-Drug Interactions, and Biochemical Markers of Toxicity in Patients with Epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Sulthiame is an antiseizure medication increasingly used for epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame in children and adults with epilepsy with respect to age, comedication, dose, serum concentration, and biochemical markers of toxicity in a clinical setting. METHOD: Retrospective quantitative data from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway (2015-2021), were used. RESULTS: TDM data from 326 patients (127 female/199 male) were included [mean age, 11.4 (range 2-44) years; mean weight, 41 (range 14-109) kg]. Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability in the concentration/(dose/body weight) (C/(D/kg)) ratio was 16-fold; intraindividual variability was up to 8-fold (coefficient of variation = 10%-78%). Young children (younger than 6 years) had a significantly lower C/(D/kg) ratio than older age groups ( P < 0.05). Various comedications did not significantly affect the C/(D/kg) ratio, possibly owing to the small sample size. However, CYP2C19-mediated inhibition by sulthiame was indicated because patients using clobazam and sulthiame (n = 28) had a 3.5-fold higher N-desmethylclobazam C/(D/kg) ratio than those using neutral comedication (n = 45; P < 0.001). Patients with pH values below the adjusted normal range (7.32-7.42; n = 15) had a 33% higher sulthiame concentration than those with normal pH values (n = 22; P < 0.05). Blood gas measurements, especially pH, may serve as markers of toxicity and can be used in combination with clinical data when toxicity is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the extensive intraindividual and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame, with age as a contributing factor. Sulthiame has clinically relevant interactions with clobazam. The use of TDM and pH as a biochemical marker may contribute to individualized and safe sulthiame treatment.

Pharmacological aspects of antiseizure medications: From basic mechanisms to clinical considerations of drug interactions and use of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with epilepsy. Several new ASMs have recently been introduced to the market, making it possible to better tailor the treatment of epilepsy, as well as other indications (psychiatry and pain disorders). For this group of drugs there are numerous pharmacological challenges, and updated knowledge on their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties is, therefore, crucial for an optimal treatment outcome. This review focuses on educational approaches to the following learning outcomes as described by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE): To demonstrate knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug interactions with ASMs and with concomitant medications, and appropriate monitoring of ASM serum levels (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM). Basic principles in pharmacology, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinically relevant approaches to manage drug interactions are discussed. Furthermore, recent improvements in analytical technology and sampling are described. Future directions point to the combined implementation of TDM with genetic panels for proper diagnosis, pharmacogenetic tests where relevant, and the use of biochemical markers that will all contribute to personalized treatment. These approaches are clinically relevant for an optimal treatment outcome with ASMs in various patient groups.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: A summary of the Sixteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XVI): II. Drugs in more advanced clinical development.

The Sixteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XVI) was held in Madrid, Spain on May 22-25, 2022 and was attended by 157 delegates from 26 countries representing basic and clinical science, regulatory agencies, and pharmaceutical industries. One day of the conference was dedicated to sessions presenting and discussing investigational compounds under development for the treatment of seizures and epilepsy. The current progress report summarizes recent findings and current knowledge for seven of these compounds in more advanced clinical development for which either novel preclinical or patient data are available. These compounds include bumetanide and its derivatives, darigabat, ganaxolone, lorcaserin, soticlestat, STK-001, and XEN1101. Of these, ganaxolone was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in March 2022 for the treatment of seizures associated with cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 deficiency disorder in patients 2 years of age and older.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: A summary of the Sixteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XVI): I. Drugs in preclinical and early clinical development.

The Eilat Conferences have provided a forum for discussion of novel treatments of epilepsy among basic and clinical scientists, clinicians, and representatives from regulatory agencies as well as from the pharmaceutical industry for 3 decades. Initially with a focus on pharmacological treatments, the Eilat Conferences now also include sessions dedicated to devices for treatment and monitoring. The Sixteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XVI) was held in Madrid, Spain, on May 22-25, 2022 and was attended by 157 delegates from 26 countries. As in previous Eilat Conferences, the core of EILAT XVI consisted of a sequence of sessions where compounds under development were presented and discussed. This progress report summarizes preclinical and, when available, phase 1 clinical data on five different investigational compounds in preclinical or early clinical development, namely GAO-3-02, GRT-X, NBI-921352 (formerly XEN901), OV329, and XEN496 (a pediatric granular formulation of retigabine/ezogabine). Overall, the data presented in this report illustrate novel strategies for developing antiseizure medications, including an interest in novel molecular targets, and a trend to pursue potential new treatments for rare and previously neglected severe epilepsy syndromes.

Efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic variability of brivaracetam in adults with difficult-to-treat epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Brivaracetam (BRV) is one of our latest antiseizure medications (ASMs). It is an analogue of levetiracetam with limited real-life experience. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical experience with BRV with focus on efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic variability among adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data from patients aged > 18 years who initiated treatment with BRV during 2016-2019 and were followed for > one year or cessation of BRV. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 120 adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. Serum concentrations of BRV were available in 72 patients. After one-year follow-up, the retention rate of BRV was 52%. Fifty-seven patients (48%) were responders (>50 reduction of seizure frequency), of whom six became seizure free. Adverse effects were reported in 78 patients (65%); 37 (31%) experienced psychiatric problems like increased irritability, anxiety and depressive symptoms. The mean daily BRV dose was 159 mg (SD 80 mg) and the mean serum concentration 5.4 µmol/L (SD 4.1 µmol/L). In 24 patients, BRV replaced levetiracetam. Pharmacokinetic variability between patients was considerable; 14-fold variation in concentration/dose (C/D)-ratios. Concomitant use of enzyme-inducing ASMs decreased the C/D-ratio by 48%. There were no significant differences in serum concentrations between responders vs. non-responders, or those who experienced adverse effects or not. CONCLUSION: After > 1 year of treatment with BRV, we found a responder rate of 48% in adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. The drug was largely well tolerated, but one third experienced psychiatric adverse effects. The combination of clinical and pharmacokinetic data provides insight into factors contributing to efficacy and tolerability of new ASMs.

Changes in the use of antiseizure medications in children and adolescents in Norway, 2009-2018.

BACKGROUND: The use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the pediatric population is poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the use of ASMs in children and adolescents compared to adults, and to elucidate safety considerations of certain drugs. METHOD: In this population-based pharmacoepidemiological study we used the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), 2009-2018. The use of ASMs is presented as 1-year prevalence per 1000: number of ASM users in a year * 1000 / number of inhabitants that year. Variables included predetermined 5-year age groups, gender, ASMs, diagnosis-specific reimbursement codes, user, and population numbers. Selected ASMs used for specific indications or subgroups included ethosuximide, sulthiame, rufinamide, stiripentol, and clobazam. Gender differences in the use of valproate was examined due to safety considerations in girls/women. RESULTS: The total number of ASM users (all indications) for the age groups 0-19 and 20-59 years was 5807 and 47,481 respectively in 2009, and 5906 and 61,447 respectively in 2018. The 1-year prevalence for children/adolescents (0-19 years) using ASMs in epilepsy remained stable from 2008 to 2018, 4.3-4.2/1000 inhabitants, as compared to 8.2-7.6/1000 in adults (20-59 years). Valproate, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam were the three most used ASMs in epilepsy in children/adolescents, similar to adults. The selected ASMs were mainly used in children/ adolescents, accounting for 0.74/1000 in 2018 versus 0.17/1000 in adults. A significant increase was seen for sulthiame (8-fold), ethosuximide (4-fold), clobazam (3-fold), and stiripentol (2-fold). The use of ASMs in non-epilepsy indications was limited and stable (17% in 2018); mainly lamotrigine in psychiatry in adolescents (15-19 years). This finding was in contrast to extensive non-epilepsy use in adults (71% in 2018). CONCLUSION: Changes in the use of ASMs in children/adolescents differ as compared to adults, most notably extensive and increasing use of selected ASMs and limited non-epilepsy. This is an important part of pharmacovigilance and patient safety evaluations.

Pharmacokinetic data on brivaracetam, lacosamide and perampanel during pregnancy and lactation.

We present pharmacokinetic data during pregnancy and lactation for brivaracetam, lacosamide and perampanel based on two case studies. Patient 1 used brivaracetam as monotherapy and gave birth to twins. Patient 2 used a combination of brivaracetam, lacosamide and perampanel. In both patients, serum drug concentrations were monitored throughout the pregnancies. Drug concentrations were also analysed in umbilical cord blood at birth, in serum from the offspring and in breastmilk after five days and 3-11 weeks. There were minor changes in concentration/dose-ratios for brivaracetam and lacosamide. The mean milk/serum ratios for brivaracetam and lacosamide were 0.71 and 0.83, respectively, five days and 3-5 weeks after delivery. The perampanel serum concentration increased by up to 80% in Patient 2 during the last part of gestation. The mean milk/serum-ratio for perampanel was 0.13, unchanged from five days to five weeks after delivery. Whereas serum concentrations of brivaracetam and lacosamide remained fairly stable throughout pregnancy, perampanel concentrations seemed to steadily increase towards the end. The distribution to milk was considerable for brivaracetam and lacosamide and low for perampanel. More studies on mother-infant pairs are warranted to confirm these results in larger groups.

The role of new medical treatments for the management of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: Novel concepts and results.

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are among the most challenging of all epilepsies to manage, given the exceedingly frequent and often severe seizure types, pharmacoresistance to conventional antiseizure medications, and numerous comorbidities. During the past decade, efforts have focused on development of new treatment options for DEEs, with several recently approved in the United States or Europe, including cannabidiol as an orphan drug in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes and everolimus as a possible antiepileptogenic and precision drug for tuberous sclerosis complex, with its impact on the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Furthermore, fenfluramine, an old drug, was repurposed as a novel therapy in the treatment of Dravet syndrome. The evolution of new insights into pathophysiological processes of various DEEs provides possibilities to investigate novel and repurposed drugs and to place them into the context of their role in future management of these patients. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these new medical treatment options for the DEEs and to discuss the clinical implications of these results for improved treatment.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: A summary of the Fifteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XV). I. Drugs in preclinical and early clinical development.

Since 1992, the Eilat Conferences have provided a forum for all stakeholders in the epilepsy community to appraise the latest data on new antiepileptic drugs and emergency seizure treatments, including, in recent years, updates on progress with the development of novel monitoring and therapeutic devices. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fifteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XV) was held as a fully virtual conference on July 27-30, 2020 for the sessions on drugs and on August 3, 2020 for the sessions on devices, and was attended during the 5 days by >500 participants from 63 countries. This progress report summarizes key preclinical and initial (phase 1) clinical data on eight investigational treatments that are currently in early development, including 2-deoxy-D-glucose, GAO-3-02, JNJ-40411813, NBI-921352, NTX-001, sec-butylpropylacetamide, XEN1101, and XEN496. This report provides an overview of current scenarios in the area of treatment discovery and development. The information presented illustrates a variety of innovative strategies, including exploration of compounds with novel mechanisms of action, transplantation of interneurons into epileptogenic brain regions, and the targeting of rare, previously neglected syndromes.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: A summary of the Fifteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XV). II. Drugs in more advanced clinical development.

The Fifteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XV) was held as a fully virtual conference from July 27 to July 30, 2020 for the sessions on drugs, and on August 3, 2020 for the sessions on devices. A total of 534 delegates from 63 countries attended lectures and interactive discussions, representing a broad range of disciplines from basic science, clinical research, and clinical care. This progress report provides summaries of recent findings on investigational compounds for which preclinical data as well as data from patient studies were presented. The report includes the following five compounds: anakinra, cenobamate, CVL-865, fenfluramine, and ganaxolone, all with novel modes of action compared to more established antiepileptic drugs. Some of these compounds demonstrated promising results in placebo-controlled phase 3 trials, and two have recently received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These include cenobamate, which was approved by the FDA on November 21, 2019 for the treatment of partial onset (focal) seizures in adults, and fenfluramine oral solution, which was approved by the FDA on June 25, 2020 for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome in patients 2 years and older.

A retrospective review of changes and challenges in the use of antiseizure medicines in Dravet syndrome in Norway.

OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by severe and drug-resistant seizures in early childhood, followed by developmental delay. The purpose of this study was to investigate aspects of pharmacological treatment of Norwegian patients with Dravet syndrome, focusing on the use of antiseizure medicines (ASMs) and identifying treatment challenges. METHODS: Patients were identified through medical registries at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway and National Center for Rare Epilepsy Related Disorders during 2008-2018. Additional clinical data were obtained from medical records and laboratory request forms. RESULTS: We identified 53 patients with Dravet syndrome, 30/23 males/females, aged 2-50 years. The majority of patients with known seizure frequency experienced frequent seizures, 80% (n = 35/44). Only two patients were seizure-free. Valproate (n = 48), clobazam (n = 45), levetiracetam (n = 30), and stiripentol (n = 38) were most commonly used, previous or current use. More than one-third (n = 20) had tried sodium channel blockers (including lamotrigine), but these drugs were used less during the last decade. Polytherapy was common, 81% (n = 43) used two or more ASMs, and eight of these patients used 4-5 drugs (15%). Several challenges were identified: high seizure frequency, comorbidities, treatment changes with a wide range of ASMs, common use of oral gastro-tubes, extensive polypharmacy, and drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of ASMs has changed over the last decade, in accordance with updated international recommendations. Various treatment challenges were identified. This vulnerable group of patients needs close follow-up for an optimal treatment outcome.

Pharmacokinetic Variability During Long-Term Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valproate, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam in Patients With Dravet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiseizure medications (ASMs) may contribute to treatment optimization in individual patients. This study included patients with Dravet syndrome as they often require close monitoring because of polypharmacy with various ASMs. The aim was to use long-term TDM to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of ASMs in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients with Dravet syndrome were collected from the TDM database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2008-2018). Concentration/(dose/kg)ratios (C/D ratios) were calculated for the ASMs and the concentration (C/C ratio) for N-desmethylclobazam. In patients with at least 3 measurements, the CV for C/D ratios for intrapatient and interpatient variability was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (30 male patients/23 female patients) between 2 and 50 years of age (mean, 16 years) were included. Pharmacokinetic variability of the total number of measurements of valproate (n = 417), clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (n = 328), and levetiracetam (n = 238) was determined. Interpatient variability was more pronounced than intrapatient variability (coefficient of variations: valproate, 65% vs. 24%; levetiracetam, 71% vs. 27%; and clobazam/N-desmethylclobazam, 47%/77% vs. 35%/55%) (P < 0.01). Comedication with stiripentol (n = 16) increased the C/D ratio of valproate by 63% and of clobazam by 133% and the C/C ratio of N-desmethylclobazam/clobazam by 104% (P < 0.05). Younger age also contributed to pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term TDM revealed extensive variability in serum concentrations over time; the variability was lowest for levetiracetam, moderate for valproate, and highest for clobazam. Pharmacokinetic variability and interactions can thus be identified and adjusted to facilitate decision making to achieve the optimal treatment outcome.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs: current status and future prospects.

Introduction: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with epilepsy, and there are presently 27 licensed AEDs making AEDs among the most common medications for which therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current evidence of the use and implementation of AED TDM in patients with epilepsy and other non-epilepsy conditions.Areas covered: The pharmacokinetic variability of AEDs is extensive, resulting in pronounced variability in serum concentrations between patients. TDM may thus be useful to individualize the treatment of patients with epilepsy and also in non-epilepsy conditions. Indications for TDM include settings where pharmacokinetic variability is anticipated (e.g. in children, the elderly, during pregnancy, and patients prescribed polytherapy resulting in drug interactions) and drug adherence. TDM contributes to provide a quality assurance of the treatment. Patient management is, therefore, best guided by the determination of individual therapeutic concentrations.Expert opinion: Because of pharmacokinetic variability is prevalent among AEDs, TDM allows a bespoke approach to epilepsy care allowing dose adjustments based on measured drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. Future advances include the use of additional markers of toxicity and genetic variability so as to further aid individualization and optimize AED treatment.

Clinical experience combined with therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide.

OBJECTIVE: Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with insufficient clinical experience in patients with intellectual disability (ID). They often have more severe epilepsy with comorbidities. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with refractory epilepsy with and without ID in a real-life setting, taking drug monitoring (TDM) data into account therapeutic. METHODS: Retrospectively, we identified 344 patients using LCM from the TDM service covering the majority of the country, at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2013-2018). Clinical and TDM data were available for 132 patients. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 132 patients (33%) had ID. The retention rate was significantly higher in the ID vs the non-ID group after 1 year (84% vs 68%, P < .05). By combining clinical and TDM data, we demonstrated that 37/38 responding patients had serum concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (>10 µmol/L), and 16/17 with lower concentrations were non-responders. Mean serum concentration/dose ratios were similar in both groups, 0.06 and 0.07 µmol/L/mg. There were no significant differences regarding efficacy and tolerability. The risk of LCM withdrawal was significantly higher when LCM was added to sodium channel blockers, even if the latter was discontinued. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, where one third had ID, and in these patients the retention rate was higher. The combination of clinical and TDM data could possibly facilitate LCM therapy in these vulnerable patients.

Treatment and challenges with antiepileptic drugs in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) may have uncontrolled seizures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use and challenges with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the patients' view of these challenges. METHOD: A questionnaire about the use of AEDs, adherence to therapy, and quality of life was given to patients with JME recruited from Drammen Hospital. Data regarding AEDs were confirmed from medical records at Drammen Hospital, Norway (2007-2018). Additional clinical interviews were performed, and a mixed method approach was applied. RESULTS: Ninety patients with defined JME diagnosis, 54/36 women/men aged 14-39 (mean: 25) years, were included. Only 29 (33%) were seizure-free. Within the last year, 21% experienced generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), and 68% had myoclonic jerks. Seventy-six (84%) used AEDs, 78% in monotherapy. A total of 10 AEDs were used;: most commonly valproate (n = 33), lamotrigine (n = 27), and levetiracetam (n = 21). Two-thirds of valproate users were men while all other AEDs were used more in females than in men. Valproate and levetiracetam displayed better efficacy against GTCS than lamotrigine. One-third often/sometimes forgot their medication nonintentionally while 14% had intentional poor adherence. The majority reported good quality of life (76%). No significant correlations between the use of AEDs, use of valproate, poor adherence, quality of life score, and seizure freedom were demonstrated. Half of the patients had serum concentrations measured every year, and two-thirds thought this was important. Qualitative interviews elucidated treatment challenges in JME;, adverse effect burden, adherence, and activities of daily life. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of AEDs in the majority of patients, only one-third were seizure-free. Other challenges included polypharmacy, the use of valproate in women, and variable adherence. This points to a need for closer follow-up in patients with JME.

Long-term follow-up with therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with juvenile myoclonus epilepsy (JME) may experience uncontrolled seizures and challenges regarding adherence. Implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may contribute to individualization of the therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The purpose of this study was to investigate how the treatment of patients with JME is monitored and to demonstrate pharmacokinetic variability within and between patients with a long-term TDM approach. METHOD: Retrospective data from patients with JME from the TDM-database at Drammen Hospital and the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2007-2018) were included. RESULTS: Data from 80 of 90 patients with JME using AEDs with TDM measurements was included (88%, 49/31 women/men aged 14-39). One third (27, 33%) was seizure free, 19 (24%) had generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and 53 (66%) myoclonic seizures during the last year. The most common AEDs measured included lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam. Long-term TDM demonstrated variability over time expressed as intra-patient median values and inter-patient ranges of 19% (7-47) for valproate, 43% (10-83) for lamotrigine and 35% (6-111) for levetiracetam. Fifteen pecent (83/563) of serum concentrations were below the reference ranges and clould be due to variable adherence. Comedication with valproate for lamotrigine and pregnancy contributed to variability. The applicability is illustrated in a case of 10 years' follow-up in a young woman. CONCLUSION: There was extensive pharmacokinetic variability of AEDs in and between patients with JME. A long-term TDM approach may contribute to closer monitoring of patients with JME and be used as a practical tool during clinical consultations.

Safety aspects of antiepileptic drugs-a population-based study of adverse effects relative to changes in utilisation.

PURPOSE: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used, and knowledge about adverse effects is scarce based on clinical studies. The purpose of the present study was to characterise adverse effects reports of AEDs in Norway relative to changes in utilisation in various indications from population-based data to elucidate important safety aspects of use of AEDs. METHODS: Aggregated data of adverse effects reported for AEDs in Norway from the EudraVigilance-database (2004-2013) in addition to indication-specific use of AEDs during 2004-2015 from the Norwegian Prescription Database were used. RESULTS: The use of AEDs increased twofold the last decade due to use in psychiatry and neuropathic pain: lamotrigine, pregabalin, gabapentin, valproate, and carbamazepine. There were 1593 adverse effects reported (403 Individual Case Safety Reports, 2/3 women), 0-95 years (mean 46). Most adverse effects were reported for pregabalin (593), carbamazepine (265), lamotrigine (206), gabapentin (144), and valproate (119), where pregabalin had by far the highest reports in relation to the number of users. The most frequently reported adverse drug effects included rash, dizziness, cross-sensitivity reactions, and pyrexia. Overall, nervous system disorders constitute the largest organ class with the majority of the reports. Reporting of fatal outcomes is mandatory, and sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) was reported in 34 occasions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that most adverse effects reported concerned AEDs increasingly used in non-epilepsy indications: neuropathic pain (pregabalin, gabapentin, carbamazepine) and psychiatry (lamotrigine, valproate, carbamazepine). Pregabalin had the highest prevalence of adverse effects reported in relation to number of users. This elucidates an important part of pharmacovigilance for improved safety and considerations in clinical practice.

A summary of data presented at the XIV conference on new antiepileptic drug and devices (EILAT XIV).

The Fourteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XIV) took place in Madrid, Spain from May 13th to 16th 2018. Again, presentations on new medical devices and neuromodulation and discussions on device-related regulatory aspects were included in the programme. The virtual special issue on "neuromodulation" summarises the presentations focusing firstly, on the pre-clinical developments and the difficulties of clinical trial designs for neuromodulatory therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and Brain-Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS), and the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) as a potential screening tool for determining the efficacy of neuromodulatory treatments in individual patients; secondly, on wearable devices for seizure monitoring through indices of peripheral sympathetic nervous activity, the use of such devices in combination with biofeedback for the treatment of epilepsy, and its potential for improving epilepsy specialist services, particularly in remote areas.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of gabapentin in various indications.

OBJECTIVES: Gabapentin has been increasingly used in various indications in recent years. Despite variable pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is scarcely described in other indications than epilepsy. The aim of the study was to investigate the use and pharmacokinetic variability of gabapentin in epilepsy and non-epilepsy indications and to further evaluate the use of TDM in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS). MATERIALS & METHODS: Population-based data from the Norwegian Prescription Database, retrospective TDM data from the section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, and prospective observational data on patients with RLS were used. RESULTS: The use of gabapentin increased by 30% from 2014 to 2017 (32 181 to 42 675 users). TDM data from 120 patients showed a 22-fold pharmacokinetic variability in concentration/dose ratios, and this ratio was elevated in elderly patients (≥65 years). The majority of elderly used gabapentin for non-epilepsy indications. In patients with RLS, intake in the evening/night only was common due to nocturnal symptoms, in contrast to regular dosing regimens in epilepsy. Thus, drug fasting concentrations do not reflect concentrations at the time of required therapeutic effect. TDM was still found useful in most patients to support dosage increase or evaluate adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Due to extensive pharmacokinetic variability, TDM can benefit patients using gabapentin. Challenges with applying TDM in new indications such as RLS include different dosage regimens and consequently different interpretation of serum concentrations. Thus, TDM should be requested on clear clinical grounds and the service tailored according to the therapeutic indication.

Pharmacokinetic Variability and Clinical Use of Lacosamide in Children and Adolescents in Denmark and Norway.

BACKGROUND: The indication for the antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM) was recently extended to include children from the age of 4 years. Real-life data on the use and serum concentrations of LCM in children and adolescents are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of LCM in this patient group in relation to age, comedication, dose, serum concentrations and duration of treatment, and to examine pharmacokinetic variability. METHODS: Children and adolescents (<18 years) who had serum concentrations of LCM measured from January 2012 to June 2018 were retrospectively identified from the therapeutic drug monitoring databases at 2 national epilepsy centers in Norway and Denmark. Clinical data were collected from request forms and medical records. RESULTS: Data from 124 patients were included, 61 girls/63 boys. Weight was available for 76 patients. Median age was 15 years (range 2-17 years), dose of LCM 300 mg/d (76-600 mg/d), and serum concentration 18 µmol/L (5-138 µmol/L) [4.5 mg/L (1.3-34.5 mg/L)]. Pharmacokinetic variability was demonstrated as the concentration/(dose/kg) ratio ranged from 1.3 to 9.4 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) and was affected by age. Polytherapy with 1-3 other antiepileptic drugs was noted in 107 patients (86%). Treatment was continued beyond 1 year in 71% (n = 45) of the 63 patients where such information was available, and all of these 45 patients had serum concentrations within the defined reference range. The 1-year retention rate was higher in patients not concomitantly using other sodium channel-blocking drugs (82% versus 56%). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates pharmacokinetic variability in and between age groups, which indicates usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. More than two-thirds of patients continued treatment beyond 1 year, suggesting reasonable effectiveness.