Characterization of CSF inflammatory markers after hemorrhagic stroke and their relationship to disease severity.

Background: The inflammatory response within the central nervous system is a key driver of secondary brain injury after hemorrhagic stroke, both in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). In this study, we aimed to characterize inflammatory molecules in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients within 72 hours of hemorrhage to understand how such molecules vary across disease types and disease severity. Methods: Biological samples were collected from patients admitted to a single-center Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of ICH or aSAH between 2014 and 2022. Control CSF samples were collected from patients undergoing CSF diversion for normal pressure hydrocephalus. A panel of immune molecules in the plasma and CSF samples was analyzed using Cytometric Bead Array assays. Clinical variables, including demographics, disease severity, and intensive care unit length of stay were collected. Results: Plasma and/or CSF samples were collected from 260 patients (188 ICH patients, 54 aSAH patients, 18 controls). C-C motif chemokine ligand-2 (CCL2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), were detectable in the CSF within the first 3 days after hemorrhage, and all were elevated compared to plasma. Compared with controls, CCL2, IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, and VEGF were elevated in the CSF of both ICH and aSAH patients (p<0.01 for all comparisons). VEGF was increased in ICH patients compared to aSAH patients (p<0.01). CCL2, G-CSF, and VEGF in the CSF were associated with more severe disease in aSAH patients only. Conclusions: Within 3 days of hemorrhagic stroke, proinflammatory molecules can be detected in the CSF at higher concentrations than in the plasma. Early concentrations of some pro-inflammatory molecules may be associated with markers of disease severity.

A multi-laboratory preclinical trial in rodents to assess treatment candidates for acute ischemic stroke.

Human diseases may be modeled in animals to allow preclinical assessment of putative new clinical interventions. Recent, highly publicized failures of large clinical trials called into question the rigor, design, and value of preclinical assessment. We established the Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network (SPAN) to design and implement a randomized, controlled, blinded, multi-laboratory trial for the rigorous assessment of candidate stroke treatments combined with intravascular thrombectomy. Efficacy and futility boundaries in a multi-arm multi-stage statistical design aimed to exclude from further study highly effective or futile interventions after each of four sequential stages. Six independent research laboratories performed a standard focal cerebral ischemic insult in five animal models that included equal numbers of males and females: young mice, young rats, aging mice, mice with diet-induced obesity, and spontaneously hypertensive rats. The laboratories adhered to a common protocol and efficiently enrolled 2615 animals with full data completion and comprehensive animal tracking. SPAN successfully implemented treatment masking, randomization, prerandomization inclusion and exclusion criteria, and blinded assessment of outcomes. The SPAN design and infrastructure provide an effective approach that could be used in similar preclinical, multi-laboratory studies in other disease areas and should help improve reproducibility in translational science.