Crucial nuances in understanding (mis)associations between the neonatal microbiome and Cesarean delivery.

As rates of Cesarean delivery and common non-communicable disorders (NCDs), such as obesity, metabolic disease, and atopy/asthma, have concomitantly increased in recent decades, investigators have attempted to discern a causal link. One line of research has led to a hypothesis that Cesarean birth disrupts the presumed normal process of colonization of the neonatal microbiome with vaginal microbes, yielding NCDs later in life. However, a direct link between a disrupted microbiota transfer at time of delivery and acute and/or chronic illness in infants born via Cesarean has not been causally established. Microbiota seeding from maternal vaginal or stool sources has been preliminarily evaluated as an intervention designed to compensate for the lack of (or limited) exposure to such sources among Cesarean-delivered neonates. However, to date, clinical trials have yet to show a clear health benefit with neonatal 'vaginal seeding' practices. Until the long-term effects of these microbiome alterations can be fully determined, it is paramount to conduct parallel meaningful and mechanistic-minded interrogations of the impact of clinically modifiable maternal, nutritional, or environmental exposure on the functional microbiome over the duration of pregnancy and lactation to determine their role in the mitigation of childhood and adult NCDs.

Relationship Between Umbilical Cord Gas Values and Neonatal Outcomes: Implications for Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between umbilical artery cord gas values and fetal tolerance of labor, as reflected by Apgar score. We hypothesized the existence of wide biological variability in fetal tolerance of metabolic acidemia, which, if present, would weaken one fundamental assumption underlying the use of electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of term, singleton, nonanomalous fetuses delivered in our institution between March 2012 and July 2020. Universally obtained umbilical cord gas values and Apgar scores were extracted. We calculated Spearman correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curves for various levels of umbilical artery pH, base excess, and Apgar scores. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 29,787 deliveries. The statistical correlation between umbilical artery pH and base excess and both 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores was weak or nonexistent in all pH range subgroups (range 0.064-0.213). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested umbilical artery pH value of 7.22 yields the best discrimination for prediction of a severely depressed newborn (5-minute Apgar score less than 4), but sensitivity and specificity for this predictive value remains poor to moderate. CONCLUSION: The use of electronic FHR monitoring is predicated on a documented relationship between FHR patterns and umbilical artery pH, and an assumed correlation between pH and fetal outcomes, reflecting fetal tolerance of labor and delivery. Our data demonstrate a weak-to-absent correlation between metabolic acidemia and even short-term fetal condition, thus significantly weakening this latter assumption. No amount of future modification of FHR pattern interpretation to better predict newborn pH is likely to lead to improved newborn outcomes, given this weakness in a fundamental assumption on which FHR monitoring is based.

Enhancing the Teaching Environment: 3-Year Follow-Up of a Resident-Led Residents-as-Teachers Program.

BACKGROUND: Previous faculty-driven residents-as-teachers (RAT) models have had limited efficacy and sustainability. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability and effects of a resident-led RAT program on resident teaching. METHODS: In October 2016, obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents at a large academic institution implemented a resident-led RAT program, consisting of a steering committee of peer-selected residents with 2 faculty mentors who planned education-focused resident didactics and journal clubs, organized resident involvement in clerkship activities, and recognized residents who excelled in teaching as Distinguished Educators (DEs). From July 2016 through June 2019, using the Kirkpatrick Model, we evaluated the program with annual resident surveys assessing self-perception of 13 teaching skills (5-point Likert scale) and value of RAT program, institutional end-of-clerkship student evaluations of resident teaching, and resident participation in DE award. RESULTS: Annual resident survey response rates ranged from 63% to 88%. Residents' self-reported teaching skills improved significantly in 11 of 13 domains from 2016 to 2018 (improvements ranging from 0.87-1.42; 5-point Likert scale; P < .05). Of the 2018 respondents, 80% agreed that the resident-led RAT program added value to the residency. For 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years, 47% and 48% of medical students (100% response rate) strongly agreed that residents provided effective teaching compared to 30% in 2016-2017 (P < .05). Ten residents have graduated as DEs during this time period. CONCLUSIONS: A resident-led RAT program increased residents' self-reported teaching skills, improved medical student perceptions of teaching quality, and was sustainable and acceptable over a 3-year period.

Training the Next Generation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Leaders, A Multi-Institutional Needs Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess resident and faculty interest in, as well as content and preferred format for, a leadership curriculum during obstetrics and gynecology residency DESIGN: From June to July 2019, a needs assessment survey on leadership training was distributed to residents and academic faculty at 3 United States obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. Open ended questions were analyzed for themes. SETTING: Three ob/gyn residency programs across the United States: Kaiser Permanente East Bay in Oakland, California, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, and Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, New York. PARTICIPANTS: Surveys were distributed to all residents (n = 111) and affiliated academic faculty (n = 124) at each of the 3 participating sites. RESULTS: Resident response rate was 71% (79/111) and faculty rate was 63% (78/124). Postgraduate year (PGY) 1 residents were more likely to believe there was sufficient leadership training during residency (17/23, 74%) compared to PGY 2-4s (16/56, 29%) and faculty (20/76, 26%; p < 0.01). Most residents (66/79, 84%) and faculty (74/78, 82%) expressed that residents would benefit from a leadership curriculum. Both deemed small group exercises and leadership case studies taught by physicians were the preferred format for this curriculum. Residents and faculty agreed on 3 of the top 4 topics for a leadership curriculum - effective communication, team management, and time management - while residents chose self-awareness and faculty chose professionalism as the fourth of their top domains. Open-ended survey questions revealed that leadership demands in obstetrics and gynecology are similar to other specialties but differ in emphasis on crisis management, situational awareness, and advocacy training. CONCLUSIONS: Given unique aspects of leadership within the specialty, obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty see benefit for specialty-specific formalized leadership training.

Pathophysiologic Origins of Brachial Plexus Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the origins and consequences of cases of brachial plexus injuries and their relationship to shoulder dystocia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study and identified all neonates with brachial plexus injury delivered at our institution between March 2012 and July 2019. A review was performed of the maternal and neonatal records of each neonate to identify obstetric antecedents, including the occurrence of shoulder dystocia and persistence of the injury. Experience of the delivering clinician was also examined. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test, χ test for trends, and two-tailed t tests. RESULTS: Thirty-three cases of brachial plexus injury were identified in 41,525 deliveries (0.08%). Fourteen (42%) of these cases were not associated with shoulder dystocia; three (9%) followed cesarean delivery. Brachial plexus injury without shoulder dystocia was related to the absence of maternal diabetes, lower birth weights, and a longer second stage of labor. Persistent brachial plexus injury at the time of discharge was seen with equal frequency among neonates with (17/19, 89%, 95% CI 0.52-100%) and without shoulder dystocia (10/14, 71%, 95% CI 34-100%), P=.36). Whether brachial plexus injury was transient or persistent after shoulder dystocia was unrelated to the years of experience of the delivering clinician. Despite ongoing training and simulation, the already low incidence of brachial plexus injury did not decrease over time at our institution. CONCLUSION: Brachial plexus injury and shoulder dystocia represent two complications of uterine forces driving a fetus through the maternal pelvis in the presence of disproportion between the passage and the shoulder girdle of the passenger. Either or both of these complications may occur, but often are not causally related.

Antepartum Testing for the Prevention of Stillbirth: Where Do We Go From Here?

Unexpected antepartum fetal demise remains one of the most tragic complications of pregnancy. Various approaches to antepartum fetal assessment have been developed as a means of either reassuring the clinician of fetal well-being or identifying potential fetal jeopardy and the need for delivery. As additional high-risk groups of women are identified, indications for antenatal testing continue to expand despite a paucity of good-quality data linking such testing to improved outcomes for women with these additional risk factors. The expansion of established antepartum testing protocols to include women with conditions such as advanced maternal age or obesity without additional, well-established indications for testing is not warranted, particularly because baseline rates of stillbirth seen with these conditions before 39 weeks of gestation are already lower than stillbirth rates achieved with current antepartum testing protocols. Beyond 39 weeks of gestation, if the established risks of stillbirth are deemed unacceptable, delivery is a more rational and evidence-based approach than antepartum testing.