Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 15582, 2021 08 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341387

RESUMO

MicroRNA-371a-3p (miR371) has been suggested as a sensitive biomarker in testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC). We aimed to compare miR371 with the classical biomarkers α-fetoprotein (AFP) and ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGß). Overall, 180 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study, with serum samples collected before and after orchiectomy. We compared the use of digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR) with the quantitative PCR used by others for detection of miR371. The novel RT-ddPCR protocol showed high performance in detection of miR371 in serum samples. In the study cohort, miR371 was measured using RT-ddPCR. MiR371 detected CS1 of the seminoma and the non-seminoma sub-types with a sensitivity of 87% and 89%, respectively. The total sensitivity was 89%. After orchiectomy, miR371 levels declined in 154 of 159 TGCC cases. The ratio of miR371 pre- and post-orchiectomy was 20.5 in CS1 compared to 6.5 in systemic disease. AFP and hCGß had sensitivities of 52% and 51% in the non-seminomas. MiR371 is a sensitive marker that performs better than the classical markers in all sub-types and clinical stages. Especially for the seminomas CS1, the high sensitivity of miR371 in detecting TGCC cells may have clinical implications.


Assuntos
MicroRNAs/sangue , MicroRNAs/genética , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/sangue , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Orquiectomia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Neoplasias Testiculares/sangue , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Gonadotropina Coriônica/sangue , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Estabilidade de RNA/genética , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análise
2.
Scand J Urol ; 52(2): 116-121, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29334304

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes and complication rates based on the Clavien classification between laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective quality registry clinical data were consecutively entered for 544 LRP and 1081 RALP patients operated from 2003 to the end of 2012. Complications within 90 days postoperatively were assessed according to the Clavien classification and compared between LRP and RALP patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses of logistic regression were used to fit oncological outcomes and complication data. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 213 and 135 minutes in LRP and RALP patients, respectively. Pathological T3a stage (pT3a) in the RALP group was more frequent than in the LRP group, 32.4% versus 17.8%, respectively. For pT2 tumours, positive surgical margins (PSM) rate for LRP and RALP, was 20.3% vs 10.6%, respectively (p < .001). In the LRP group 74 patients (13.6%) reported 104 and in the RALP group 141 patients (13.0%) reported 177 complications (p = .75). Seventeen (3.1%) LRP patients and 15 (1.4%) RALP patients had Clavien grade IIIb complications (p = .017). Surgical reintervention was necessary in 14 patients (2.6%) and 17 patients (1.6%) in the LRP and RALP group, respectively (p = .04). CONCLUSION: Switching from LRP to RALP resulted in a much shorter operation time without compromising oncological outcome. There was no statistically significant difference in overall complication-rates between LRP and RALP. However, LRP patients had more serious complications and increased need for surgical reintervention compared to RALP patients.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Reoperação , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA