A user-centered approach to the development of a diet education tool for older adults with tooth loss.

BACKGROUND: Tooth loss is associated with suboptimal nutrient intake and greater risk of malnutrition. OBJECTIVE: To develop and field-test a stakeholder-informed diet education tool that addresses the unique needs of older adults with tooth loss who do not wear dentures. METHODS: An iterative user-centered approach was used. Initial content was developed based on findings from previous research. Stakeholder panels of older adults with 20 or fewer teeth, and dentists, were conducted at two time points to obtain feedback on the tool, which was revised following each panel. The tool was field-tested in a dental school clinic and evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool; it was further revised based on feedback. RESULTS: A diet education tool entitled "Eating Healthier With Tooth Loss" was developed. Sections for fruits and vegetables, grains, and proteins food groups, and one addressing socioemotional aspects of eating with missing teeth were included. Panel members provided constructive, positive feedback; recommendations for editing text, images, design, and content were integrated. Field-testing in the dental clinic with 27 pairs of student dentists and their patients resulted in scores of 95.7% for understandability and 96.6% for actionability, with over 85% agreement with each item. The tool was revised based on field-testing feedback. CONCLUSION: A diet education tool for older adults with tooth loss was developed using a user-centered approach, integrating the 'patient voice' and patient experiences with US dietary guidelines. Use of this tool is feasible in a dental clinic setting. Future research should explore usage in larger settings.

Family Systems Cultural and Resilience Dimensions to Consider in Nutrition Interventions: Exploring Preschoolers' Eating and Physical Activity Routines During COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the weight-related family functioning of racial minority families with low income using family systems theory as an interpretive framework. DESIGN: Primarily a qualitative study with interviews plus; descriptive demographics, anthropometrics, a family functioning measure, and food insecurity screening. SETTING: Telephone interviews with families of preschool-aged children in an urban setting. PARTICIPANTS: Primary caregivers of preschool-aged children. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Cultural impacts on family systems. ANALYSIS: Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and loaded into NVivo 12 for thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The 23 participants were mothers and 2 maternal grandmothers. Seventy-four percent were African American, most children were normal weight (n = 15, 65%), mean family function scores were high, and more than half the families were at risk for food insecurity (n = 13, 56%). Acculturation and intergenerational eating-related cultural dimensions were discerned as the overarching themes influencing family cohesion. Family cohesion appeared to have helped the families adapt to the impact of coronavirus disease 2019. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Cultural dimensions such as acculturation and intergenerational influences appeared to be associated with social cohesion and family functioning around weight-related behaviors for these families. These findings add cultural and family resilience dimensions to family systems theory in nutrition interventions.

Upstage Rate of Complex Sclerosing Lesions/Radial Scars.

BACKGROUND: Radial scars (RS) and complex sclerosing lesions (CSL) are breast radiologic findings described as small, stellate lesions causing architectural distortion. This can mimic malignancy. Core needle biopsy (CNB) is often performed. Advances in breast imaging have led to increased detection of RS/CSL. The upstage rate of RS/CSL to in situ or invasive disease is 0-40%. We sought to determine the upstaging rate of RS/CSL to in situ, invasive disease, or high-risk lesion at our institution to create excision guidelines. METHODS: The pathology database of a single center was searched for RS/CSL, from January 2013 to September 2020. We included CNB without malignancy or high-risk lesion (eg, atypical ductal hyperplasia). Patient demographics, indications for biopsy, imaging findings, biopsy procedure, and final pathology were collected. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included. 52.3% had CNB for architectural distortion on mammography, 18.2% for mass, 11.4% for calcifications, 2.3% for abnormal MRI, and 15.9% for multiple reasons (eg, calcifications and mass). Most had an ultrasound: 43.2% had no abnormality and 34.1% had a mass. All CNB were vacuum assisted, 65.9% with 9-gauge needle, and averaged 10.0 cores. 77.3% were stereotactic biopsies, 13.6% ultrasound, and 6.8% MRI. 59.1% had excision after CNB. 82.1% of patients did not upstage. One patient upstaged to invasive ductal carcinoma (3.6%) and two patients to high-risk lesion (7.1%). DISCUSSION: There was low upstage rate of RS/CSL on excisional biopsy. Centers could consider close surveillance for RS/CSL on CNB. Longer follow-up in cases of deferred excision is needed to ensure oncologic safety.

Hematoma Risks of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Used in Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The opioid crisis in America has sparked a shift toward a multimodality perioperative pain regimen. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the perioperative period decreases opioid consumption and increases efficacy. However, many plastic surgeons avoid their use because of antiplatelet effects. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the plastic surgery literature to assess the risk of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation. METHODS: A systematic review of articles published in PubMed was performed in September 2018 to investigate the incidence of increased bleeding and hematoma formation with use of NSAIDs in the perioperative period in plastic surgery. All articles were reviewed for primary outcome measures, and a selective literature review was performed to examine perioperative NSAID use in other surgical subspecialties. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Our search yielded 806 total articles, with 15 meeting inclusion criteria, and this included 3064 patients (1679 with perioperative NSAIDs, 1385 with no NSAIDs). There was no significant difference in overall incidence of bleeding/hematoma in the treatment group versus control (no NSAIDs). The overall pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval were 1.20 and 0.73 to 1.97 (P = 0.48). When separated by drug administered across all plastic surgery procedures, there were no statistically significant differences in incidences of hematoma or increased bleeding with use of ketorolac (OR, 1.48 [0.86-2.56]; P = 0.57), ibuprofen (OR, 0.55 [0.14-2.14]; P = 0.87), or celecoxib (OR, 0.22 [0.02-2.52]; P = 0.39). When examining NSAID use in breast surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of hematoma or increased bleeding when combining all 3 drug types (OR, 1.39 [0.82-2.37]; P = 0.60). Some individual studies demonstrated trends toward increased bleeding/hematoma in reduction mammoplasties. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs significantly improve pain control and decrease opioid use when used in plastic surgery. The majority of evidence in plastic surgery does not support an increased incidence of bleeding/hematoma with the use of perioperative NSAIDs.

The Relationship of Endoscopic Proficiency to Educational Expense for Virtual Reality Simulator Training Amongst Surgical Trainees.

With the introduction of Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery, training methods in flexible endoscopy are being augmented with simulation-based curricula. The investment for virtual reality simulators warrants further research into its training advantage. Trainees were randomized into bedside or simulator training groups (BED vs SIM). SIM participated in a proficiency-based virtual reality curriculum. Trainees' endoscopic skills were rated using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES) in the patient care setting. The number of cases to reach 90 per cent of the maximum GAGES score and calculated costs of training were compared. Nineteen residents participated in the study. There was no difference in the average number of cases required to achieve 90 per cent of the maximum GAGES score for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 13 (SIM) versus11 (BED) (P = 0.63), or colonoscopy 21 (SIM) versus 4 (BED) (P = 0.34). The average per case cost of training for esophagogastroduodenoscopy was $35.98 (SIM) versus $39.71 (BED) (P = 0.50), not including the depreciation costs associated with the simulator ($715.00 per resident over six years). Use of a simulator appeared to increase the cost of training without accelerating the learning curve or decreasing faculty time spent in instruction. The importance of simulation in endoscopy training will be predicated on more cost-effective simulators.

Building social networks for health promotion: Shout-out Health, New Jersey, 2011.

BACKGROUND: Building social networks for health promotion in high-poverty areas may reduce health disparities. Community involvement provides a mechanism to reach at-risk people with culturally tailored health information. Shout-out Health was a feasibility project to provide opportunity and support for women at risk for or living with human immunodeficiency virus infection to carry out health promotion within their informal social networks. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: The Shout-out Health project was designed by an academic-community agency team. During 3 months, health promotion topics were chosen, developed, and delivered to community members within informal social networks by participants living in Paterson and Jersey City, New Jersey. METHODS: We recruited women from our community agency partner's clients; 57 women participated in in-person or online meetings facilitated by our team. The participants identified and developed the health topics, and we discussed each topic and checked it for message accuracy before the participants provided health promotion within their informal social networks. The primary outcome for evaluating feasibility included the women's feedback about their experiences and the number of times they provided health promotion in the community. Other data collection included participant questionnaires and community-recipient evaluations. OUTCOME: More than half of the participants reported substantial life challenges, such as unemployment and housing problems, yet with technical support and a modest stipend, women in both groups successfully provided health promotion to 5,861 people within their informal social networks. INTERPRETATION: Shout-out Health was feasible and has implications for building social networks to disseminate health information and reduce health disparities in communities.