Myocardial infarction induced by caseous mitral annular calcification: a case report.

Background: Caseous mitral annular calcification (CMAC) is a rare variant of mitral annular calcification. Symptoms can be related to mitral valvular dysfunction, arterial embolization, and transient aortic outflow tract obstruction. CMAC usually affects the posterior fibrous mitral annulus and is commonly diagnosed in elderly patients with a history of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and renal failure. Case summary: A 68-year-old patient was transferred to our department for late presenting acute myocardial infarction and acute heart failure. Coronary angiography revealed a significant extrinsic compression of the circumflex artery. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed an ovoid calcified mass of 3.6 cm × 2 cm originating from the posterior mitral annulus causing moderate mitral stenosis as well as akinesia of the inferolateral wall, reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (35%), and a low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Cardiac computed tomography scan confirmed the presence of a large calcified mass, inserted to the posterior mitral annulus evocating caseous necrosis. The patient underwent a double valve replacement with implantation of both aortic and mitral bioprostheses. Histopathology of the excised mass revealed a chronic mitral valve fibrocalcification with aseptic necrosis, consistent with a caseous calcification of the posterior mitral annulus. Discussion: Extrinsic coronary artery compression is a rare disease entity. We report a rather peculiar cause of extrinsic artery compression: CMAC inducing significant mitral stenosis and compressing the circumflex artery leading to myocardial infarction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of extrinsic artery compression caused by CMAC.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: review, case report and analysis of COVID-19-related cases.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) accounts for 1-4% of all acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the first description in 1931, our understanding of the disease has evolved; however, its pathophysiology and management are still a matter of debate. SCAD typically occurs in a middle-aged woman with no or few traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology depending on the primary event: an intimal tear in the "inside-out" hypothesis and a spontaneous hemorrhage from the vasa vasorum in the "outside-in" hypothesis. Etiology appears to be multifactorial: different predisposing and precipitating factors have been identified. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SCAD. Current recommendations on the treatment of SCAD patients are based on expert opinions: a conservative strategy is preferred in hemodynamically stable SCAD patients, while urgent revascularization should be considered in hemodynamically unstable patients. Eleven cases of SCAD in COVID-19 patients have already been described: although the exact pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear, COVID-19-related SCAD is considered a combination of significant systemic inflammatory response and localized vascular inflammation. We present a literature review of SCAD, and we report an unpublished case of SCAD in a COVID-19 patient.

Determination of central blood pressure by a noninvasive method (brachial BP and QKD interval).

BACKGROUND: The measurement of central blood pressure (BPc) has become a matter of importance. Several therapeutic trials have noted a different protective effect against cardiovascular complications with different antihypertensive strategies, but an identical decrease in brachial BP (BPb). A possible explanation lies in the different effects of the treatments on BPc. We propose a new noninvasive method for the automatic measurement of BPc based on the QKD interval, an arterial stiffness marker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out on patients referred for cardiac catheterization. We simultaneously measured the central SBP (SBPc) invasively with a pigtail probe, and the BPb by a cuff coupled with recording of the QKD interval. Two cohorts were studied, one to define an algorithm of SBPc estimation and one to validate this algorithm. RESULTS: The first cohort included 65 patients. We performed 136 simultaneous measurements. In the multivariate analysis, four variables were significantly correlated with SBPc: mean BPb (mBPb), QKD, height and heart rate (HR) with the following regression equation: SBP = 105 + 1.29 × mBPb - 0.39 × HR - 0.30 × height - 0.11 × QKD. This equation estimated 81% of the variance of the invasive SBPc ± 13 mmHg. This algorithm was then tested in another cohort of 80 patients. Difference between measured and estimated SBPc was 2 ± 14 mmHg. CONCLUSION: This study showed that it is possible to estimate SBPc by simultaneous measurement of QKD and BPb. If further studies confirm these results, a noninvasive ambulatory method of monitoring of SBPc could be employed in clinical practice.

Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is conventional coronary angiography (C-CAG). Lately, multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography (MSCT-CAG) demonstrated a high sensitivity and a negative predictive value for a CAD primary diagnosis when compared with C-CAG. The aim of our study is to prospectively assess the safety of ruling out CAD based solely on a normal MSCT-CAG result. METHODS: From June 15, 2004, to January 20, 2006, consecutive patients initially scheduled for C-CAG for a primary diagnosis of CAD underwent MSCT-CAG instead. Patients with a highly calcified coronary network or with an abnormal or a noninterpretable MSCT-CAG result underwent secondary C-CAG and were excluded from the study. We included patients whose diagnosis of CAD was ruled out by a normal MSCT-CAG result; in those patients, C-CAG was not performed. All patients underwent further follow-up with clinical end points (death, subsequent C-CAG, and myocardial infarction). RESULTS: In 141 patients, MSCT-CAG results were considered normal. During the follow-up period (mean, 14.7 months), those patients experienced 0% mortality, a 3.5% rate of subsequent C-CAG, and a 0.7% rate of myocardial infarction. The risks of subsequent death, new referral for C-CAG, or coronary events compare favorably with those following normal C-CAG, which were 0.4%, 4.3%, and 0.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multislice computed tomographic CAG safely rules out CAD in patients with suspected disease and allows patients to be managed less invasively, by reducing the number in whom C-CAG has to be performed.

Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as an alternative to coronary angiography, we prospectively studied its diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary artery lesions in patients with significant aortic valve stenosis undergoing valve surgery. BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic valve stenosis, coronary angiography is still recommended before surgery. Multislice computed tomography is a promising noninvasive technique for the detection of significant coronary artery lesions. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients scheduled for coronary angiography in the preoperative assessment of aortic valve stenosis underwent 16-slice MSCT 24 h before coronary angiography. We analyzed coronary lesions, image quality, and arterial calcium score. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the MSCT-based strategy in detecting significant stenosis was 100%, and its specificity 80%. The positive and negative predictive values were respectively 55% and 100%. For calcium scores <1,000 (77% of patients), MSCT detected all patients without coronary artery disease, enabling conventional coronary angiography to be avoided in 35 of 55 cases (80%). For calcium scores >1,000, MSCT enabled conventional coronary angiography to be avoided in only 6% of cases, either because significant stenosis was found with a possible indication of revascularization, or because the examination was not interpretable. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this initial experience in relatively few patients suggest that MSCT-based coronary angiography may serve as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography to rule out significant coronary artery disease in patients scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement. Larger studies are necessary to fully explore the potential of coronary MSCT to improve preoperative risk stratification.