RESUMO
A rise in the incidence of early rectal cancer consequent to bowel-screening programs around the world and an increase in the incidence in young adults has led to a growing interest in organ-sparing treatment options. The rectum, being the most distal portion of the large intestine, is a fertile ground for local excision techniques performed with endoscopic or surgical techniques. Moreover, the advancement in endoscopic optical evaluation and the better definition of imaging techniques allow for a more precise local staging of early rectal cancer. Although the local treatment of early rectal cancer seems promising, in clinical practice, a significant number of patients who could benefit from local excision techniques undergo total mesorectal excision (TME) as the first approach. All relevant prospective clinical trials were identified through a computer-assisted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline databases until January 2024. This review is dedicated to endoscopic and surgical local excision in the treatment of early rectal cancer and highlights its possible role in current and future clinical practice, taking into account surgical completion techniques and chemoradiotherapy.
RESUMO
Postoperative non variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage may occur early or late and affect a variable percentage of patients-up to about 2%. Most cases of intraluminal bleeding are an indication for urgent Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and require endoscopic haemostatic treatment. In addition to the approach usually adopted in non-variceal upper haemorrhages, these cases may be burdened with difficulties in terms of anastomotic tissue, angled positions, and the risk of further complications. There is also extreme variability related to the type of surgery performed, in the context of oncological disease or bariatric surgery. At the same time, the world of haemostatic devices available in digestive endoscopy is increasing, meeting high efficacy rates and attempting to treat even the most complex cases. Our narrative review summarises the current evidence in terms of different approaches to endoscopic haemostasis in upper bleeding in altered anatomy after surgery, proposing an up-to-date guidance for endoscopic clinicians and at the same time, highlighting areas of future scientific research.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Hemostáticos , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Endoscopia GastrointestinalRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) substantially improved the endoscopic armamentarium for the treatment of severe GI bleeding and can potentially overcome limitations of standard clips. Data indicate a superiority of OTSCs in hemostasis as first- and second-line therapy. However, the impact of the OTSC designs, in particular the traumatic (-t) or atraumatic (-a) type, in duodenal ulcer bleeding has not been analyzed so far. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective collected database from 2009 to 2020 of 6 German endoscopic centers. All patients who underwent emergency endoscopy and were treated using an OTSC for duodenal ulcer bleeding were included. OTSC-t and OTSC-a patients were compared by the Fisher exact test, χ2 test, or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. A propensity score-based 1:1 matching was performed to obtain equal distribution of baseline characteristics in both groups. RESULTS: The entire cohort comprised 173 patients (93 OTSC-a, 80 OTSC-t). Age, gender, anticoagulant therapy, Rockall score, and treatment regimen had similar distributions in the 2 groups. However, the OTSC-t group showed significantly more active bleeding ulcers (Forrest Ia/b). Matching identified 132 patients (66 in both groups) with comparable baseline characteristics. Initial bleeding hemostasis (OTSC-a, 90.9%; OTSC-t, 87.9%; P = .82) and 72-hour mortality (OTSC-a, 4.5%; OTSC-t, 6.0%; P > .99) were not significantly different, but the OTSC-t group revealed a clearly higher rate of recurrent bleeding (34.9% vs 7.6%, P < .001) and necessity of red blood cell transfusions (5.1 ± 3.4 vs 2.5 ± 2.4 concentrates, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: For OTSC use, the OTSC-a should be the preferred option for duodenal ulcer bleeding.
Assuntos
Úlcera Duodenal , Hemostase Endoscópica , Humanos , Hemostase Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Úlcera Duodenal/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/cirurgia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/etiologia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Anastomotic defects are deleterious complications after either oncologic or bariatric surgery, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Besides surgical revision in early stages or instable patients, endoscopic treatment has become the mainstay. To date, many options for endoscopic treatment in this setting exist, including fully covered metal stent placement, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), endoscopic internal drainage with pigtail placement (EID), leak closure with through the scope or over the scope clips, endoluminal suturing, fibrin glue sealing and a combination of all these techniques. Current evidence is mostly based on retrospective single and multicenter studies. No guidelines exist in this important field. Treatment options have to be chosen upon each case individually, taking into account clinical and anatomic criteria, such as timing, size, infectious wound complications and hemodynamic stability. Local expertise and availability of treatment devices need to be taken into account whenever choosing a treatment strategy. This review aimed to present current treatment options in terms of effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages in order to guide the clinician for his decision making. Additionally, we aimed to provide a treatment algorithm.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/efeitos adversos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Endoscopia/métodos , Esôfago , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Surgery of the gastrointestinal tract can result in deep changes among the gut commensals in terms of abundance, function and health consequences. Elective colorectal surgery can occur for neoplastic or inflammatory bowel disease; in these settings, microbiota imbalance is described as a preoperative condition, and it is linked to post-operative complications, as well. The study of bariatric patients led to several insights into the role of gut microbiota in obesity and after major surgical injuries. Preoperative dysbiosis and post-surgical microbiota reassessment are still poorly understood, and they could become a key part of preventing post-surgical complications. In the current review, we outline the most recent literature regarding agents and molecular pathways involved in pre- and post-operative dysbiosis in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Defining the standard method for microbiota assessment in these patients could set up the future approach and clinical practice.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric outlet obstruction can result from several benign and malignant diseases, in particular gastric, duodenal or pancreatic tumors. Surgical gastroenterostomy and enteral endoscopic stenting have represented effective therapeutic options, although recently endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is spreading improving the outcome of this condition. However, this procedure, although mini-invasive, is burdened with not negligible complications, including misdeployment. MAIN BODY: We report the case of a 60-year-old male with gastric outlet obstruction who underwent ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using LAMS. The procedure was complicated by LAMS misdeployment being managed by laparoscopy-assisted placement of a second LAMS. We performed a systematic review in order to identify all reported cases of misdeployment in EUS-GE and their management. The literature shows that misdeployment occurs in up to 10% of all EUS-GE procedures with a wide spectrum of possible strategies of treatment. CONCLUSION: The here reported hybrid technique may offer an innovative strategy to manage LAMS misdeployment when this occurs. Moreover, a hybrid approach may be valuable to overcome this complication, especially in early phases of training of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy.
Assuntos
Obstrução da Saída Gástrica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Endossonografia/efeitos adversos , Endossonografia/métodos , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/etiologia , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroenterostomia/efeitos adversos , Gastroenterostomia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/efeitos adversos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic internal drainage (EID) with double-pigtail stents or low negative-pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are treatment options for leakage after upper gastrointestinal oncologic surgery. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these techniques. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2019, patients treated with EID in five centers in France and with EVT in Göttingen, Germany were included and retrospectively analyzed using univariate analysis. Pigtail stents were changed every 4 weeks; EVT was repeated every 3-4 days until leak closure. RESULTS: 35 EID and 27 EVT patients were included, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) leak size of 0.75âcm (0.5-1.5). Overall treatment success was 100â% (95â% confidence interval [CI] 90â%-100â%) for EID vs. 85.2â% (95â%CI 66.3â%-95.8â%) for EVT (Pâ=â0.03). The median (IQR) number of endoscopic procedures was 2 (2-3) vs. 3 (2-6.5; Pâ=â0.003) and the median (IQR) treatment duration was 42 days (28-60) vs. 17 days (7.5-28; Pâ<â0.001), for EID vs. EVT, respectively. CONCLUSION: EID and EVT provide high closure rates for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. EVT provides a shorter treatment duration, at the cost of a higher number of procedures.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Drenagem , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or surgery are standard treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) refractory to endoscopic hemostasis. Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) have shown superiority to standard endoscopic treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare OTSC treatment to TAE in refractory peptic ulcer bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter study, 128 patients treated with OTSC (n = 66) or TAE (n = 62) for refractory PUB between 2009 and 2019 in four academic centers were analyzed. Primary endpoint was clinical success (hemostasis + no rebleeding within 7 days). Secondary endpoints were adverse events, length of ICU stay, and mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Patients characteristics were similar in both groups but ulcers in the TAE group were larger, more often located in the duodenal bulb (85.5% vs. 65.2%; p = 0.014), and that the proportion of Forrest Ia bleedings was higher (38.7% vs. 19.7%; p = 0.018). Clinical success was comparable in both groups (74.2% vs. 59.7%; p = 0.092). Stay on the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly longer in the TAE group (mean 8.0 vs. 4.7 days; p = 0.002). Serious adverse events after re-therapy (12.9% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.042) and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in the TAE group (9.1 vs. 22.6%, OR 2.92 [95% CI 1.04-8.16]; p = 0.05). After propensity score matching, the differences found regarding ICU stay (4.9± 5.9 and 9.2 ± 11.2; p = 0.009) and in-hospital mortality (5% vs. 22.5%; OR 5.52 [95% CI: 1.11-27.43]; p = 0.048) stayed significant. CONCLUSIONS: OTSC treatment for refractory PUB was superior to TAE in terms of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Idoso , Cateterismo , Cuidados Críticos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/instrumentação , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Análise por Pareamento , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To improve resection speed and to reach higher en bloc resection rates in lesions ≥ 2 cm, a novel grasp and snare EMR technique termed "EMR+", accomplished by an additional working channel (AWC), was developed. Its use compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is evaluated for the first time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively conducted a randomized pre-clinical ex-vivo pilot study in explanted porcine stomachs for the comparison of EMR + with classical ESD of mucosal-based lesions. Prior to intervention, we set flat lesions with a standardized size of 3 × 3 cm. RESULTS: The median time of procedure was significantly shorter in the EMR + group (median 10.5 min, range 4.4-24 min) than in the ESD group (median 32 min, range 14-61.6 min, p < .0001). The rate of en bloc resection was significantly lower in the EMR + group (38 % vs. 95 %) (p < .0001). Nevertheless, an improvement in the learning curve for EMR + was achieved after the first 12 procedures, with a subsequent en bloc resection rate of 100 %. CONCLUSIONS: EMR + could improve the efficiency of mucosal resection procedures. Initial experience demonstrates a higher and satisfactory en bloc resection rate after going through the learning curve of EMR+.
Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Animais , Mucosa , Projetos Piloto , Suínos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Management of esophageal anastomotic leaks (AL) and esophageal perforations (EP) remains difficult and often requires an interdisciplinary treatment modality. For primary endoscopic management, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) placement is often considered first-line therapy. Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as an alternative or adjunct for management of these conditions. So far, data for EVT in the upper gastrointestinal-tract is restricted to single centre, non-randomized trials. No studies on optimal negative pressure application during EVT exist. The aim of our study is to describe our centre's experience with low negative pressure (LNP) EVT for these indications over the past 5-years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2018, 30 patients were endoscopically treated for AL (n = 23) or EP (n = 7). All patients were primarily treated with EVT and LNP between -20 and -50 mm Hg. Additional endoscopic treatment was added when EVT failed. Procedural and peri-procedural data, as well as clinical outcomes including morbidity and mortality, were analysed. RESULTS: Clinical successful endoscopic treatment of EP and AL was achieved in 83.3% (n = 25/30), with 73.3% success using EVT alone (n = 22/30). Mean treatment duration until leak closure was 16.1 days (range 2-58 days). Additional treatment modalities for complete leak resolution was necessary in 10% (n = 3/30), including SEMS placement and fibrin glue injection. Mean hospital stay for patients with EP was shorter with 33.7 days compared to AL with 54.4 days (p = 0.08). Estimated preoperative 10-year overall survival (Charlson comorbidity score) was 39.4% in patients with AL and 59.9% in patients with EP (p = 0.26). A mean of 5.1 EVT changes (range 1-12) was needed in EP and 3.6 changes (range 1-13) in AL to achieve complete closure, switch to other treatment modality, or reach endoscopic failure (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: LNP EVT enables effective minimally - invasive endoluminal leak closure from anastomotic esophageal leaks and EP in high-morbid patients. In this study, EVT was combined with other endoscopic treatment options such as SEMS placement or fibrin glue injection in order to achieve leak or perforation closure in the vast majority of patients (83.3%). Low aspiration pressures led to slower but still sufficient clinical results.
Assuntos
Perfuração Esofágica , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Perfuração Esofágica/etiologia , Perfuração Esofágica/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Pyloric exclusion is a method of treatment for duodenal injury. Surgery is usually needed to restore digestive continuity in due time, yet a new surgical procedure can be challenging due to fibrotic adhesion development. We present here a retrospective case series of three patients with pyloric exclusion who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided duodenal repermeabilization using metallic stents. All procedures were successful with no complication and allowed regular feeding. This case series shows that endoscopic ultrasound-guided recanalization is a feasible and safe procedure.
RESUMO
MEDICAL HISTORY AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department following bitter zucchini ingestion. Clinical symptoms were tachycardia, hypotension, somnolence, diarrhea, hematochezia as well as exsiccosis, nausea and emesis. EXAMINATION AND DIAGNOSIS: Laboratory results showed leukocytosis and signs of exsiccosis. Ultrasound revealed thickening of the sigmoid colon wall, interpretable as acute colitis. Poisoning with cucurbitacin containing zucchini was diagnosed. THERAPY: The patient improved after intravenous fluid administration. Hemorrhagic colitis with diarrhea was self limiting. After 2 days, the patient was able to eat again. CONCLUSION: Acute food poisoning due to cucurbitacin - containing pumpkin is rare but can occur in small gardening units in association with higher outside temperatures. Cucurbitacin poisoning has to be taken into account for differential diagnosis in food poisoning. Bitter taste is essential to diagnose cucurbitacin intoxications.
Assuntos
Cucurbitacinas/efeitos adversos , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/etiologia , Idoso , Colite/induzido quimicamente , Colo Sigmoide/efeitos dos fármacos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Leucocitose/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Ultrassonografia , Vômito/induzido quimicamenteAssuntos
Úlcera Duodenal , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Hemorragia , Humanos , Instrumentos CirúrgicosRESUMO
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of right portal vein embolization using ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH-PVE) compared to other embolic agents and surgical right portal vein ligation (PVL).Material and methods: Patients with right sided liver malignancies scheduled for extensive surgery and receiving induction of liver hypertrophy via right portal vein embolization/ligature between 2010-2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Treatments included were ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx®, EVOH-PVE), ethiodized oil (Lipiodol®, Lipiodol/PVA-PVE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-PVE) or surgical ligature (PVL). Liver segments S2/3 were used to assess hypertrophy. Primary outcome was future liver remnant growth in ml/day.Results: Forty-one patients were included (EVOH-PVE n = 11; Lipiodol/PVA-PVE n = 10; PVA-PVE n = 8; PVL n = 12), the majority presenting with cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal metastases (n = 11; n = 27). Pre-interventional liver volumes were comparable (p = .095). Liver hypertrophy was successfully induced in all but one patient receiving Lipiodol/PVA-PVE. Liver segment S2/3 growth was largest for EVOH-PVE (5.38 ml/d) followed by PVA-PVE (2.5 ml/d), with significantly higher growth rates than PVL (1.24 ml/d; p < .001; p = .007). No significant difference was evident for Lipiodol/PVA-PVE (1.43 ml/d, p = .809).Conclusions: Portal vein embolization using EVOH demonstrates fastest S2/3 growth rates compared to other embolic agents and PVL, potentially due to its permanent portal vein embolization and induction of hepatic inflammation.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Veia Porta/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Óleo Etiodado/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Ligadura , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Álcool de Polivinil/administração & dosagem , Polivinil/administração & dosagem , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Endoscopic decompression of bile duct stenosis in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CC) may be difficult due to localization of the tumor, but it is important for pursuing oncologic treatment afterwards. Besides the initial diagnosis, jaundice and cholangitis are the most important indications for immediate endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the favored approach for biliary access and stent placement. Hilar tumors are more difficult to treat and sometimes need higher endoscopic or radiologic expertise. In general, biliary decompression is accompanied by antibiotic treatment. Oncologic treatment of CC remains difficult, as it has to be interrupted when -infectious complications occur. For chemotherapy, a gemcitabine/cisplatin-based regime is favored. A validated -second-line treatment does not exist. Several therapeutic options are therefore offered to patients, including photodynamic therapy, selective internal radiotherapy, and high-dose radiotherapy. Exact treatment recommendations do not exist due to tumor rarity and lack of randomized controlled trials. In the present article, we take a look at current endoscopic, medical, and oncologic challenges from the endoscopist's point of view.