Long-term neurocognitive outcomes in 204 single-suture craniosynostosis patients.

PURPOSE: Craniosynostosis, which describes premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, has been associated with a variety of neurocognitive deficits. We sought to explore the cognitive profiles of the various types of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC). METHODS: A retrospective review of children 6-18 years old with surgically corrected NSC who underwent neurocognitive testing (Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visuomotor Integration) from the years 2014-2022 was conducted. RESULTS: 204 patients completed neurocognitive testing (139 sagittal, 39 metopic, 22 unicoronal, 4 lambdoid suture). 110 (54%) of the cohort was male, and 150 (74%) were White. Mean IQ was 106.10±14.01 and mean age at surgery and testing were 9.0±12.2 months and 10.9±4.0 years, respectively. Sagittal synostosis was associated with higher scores than metopic synostosis, with significant differences in verbal IQ (109.42±15.76 vs 101.37±10.41), full-scale IQ (108.32±14.44 vs 100.05±11.76), visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 92.44±12.07), visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 95.87±11.23), and motor coordination (90.45±15.60 vs 84.21±15.44). Sagittal synostosis was associated with significantly higher scores for visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 94.95±10.24) and visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 94.82±12.75) than unicoronal synostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with sagittal synostosis, patients with metopic synostosis exhibited lower scores in verbal IQ, full-scale IQ, visuomotor integration, visual perception, and motor control after surgical correction. Despite surgical correction for premature metopic suture fusion, the effect on the adjacent frontal lobe and white matter connections to other regions of the brain may have a lasting functional impact. Patients with unicoronal synostosis exhibited lower visuomotor integration and visual perception scores.

Gaps in Access to Reconstruction Compared with Audiologic Care among Children with Microtia.

Reconstruction for microtia decreased psychosocial morbidity; timely referral for surgery is crucial. We evaluated specialist referrals for microtia at a major academic medical center. Only one-half of patients were evaluated at any point by a reconstructive craniofacial surgeon. Patients followed early for audiologic concerns may not be receiving timely referred for reconstruction.

Role of State Insurance Policy in Orthotic Helmet Access for Deformational Plagiocephaly.

BACKGROUND: Helmet therapy for deformational plagiocephaly has an ideal window for treatment, and timely access to care is vital to achieving optimal benefit. The authors evaluated the hypothesis that patients insured through Medicaid experience decreased access to helmet therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of referrals for helmet therapy to Cranial Technologies, Inc. between 2014 and 2020 across 21 states. Outcome measures were likelihood of receiving a helmet, receiving a second helmet, receiving delayed treatment, and having delayed presentation. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2020, a total of 219,869 patients were referred and 141,513 of these received a helmet. Patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive treatment (OR, 0.63; P < 0.001) and more likely to present late (OR, 1.55; P < 0.001) or receive delayed treatment (OR, 3.24; P < 0.001) compared with the commercially insured. Patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive helmet therapy in nine states, with the strongest association in Texas (OR, 0.32; P < 0.001), and more likely to receive helmet therapy in five states, with the strongest association in Colorado (OR, 1.89; P < 0.001). Medicaid was associated with late presentation and delayed treatment in all states. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Medicaid presented later and were less likely to receive helmet therapy. Findings reflected state-specific Medicaid policies, with patients in some states more likely to receive a helmet with Medicaid than with commercial insurance. However, late presentation and delays in treatment with Medicaid were observed across all states. State-specific Medicaid restrictions are likely a driving factor in determining access to helmet therapy.

Orthotic Helmet Therapy for Deformational Plagiocephaly: Stratifying Outcomes by Insurance.

OBJECTIVE: Deformational Plagiocephaly (DP) is commonly treated with cranial orthosis, or helmet therapy. A large, national study on the impact of insurance status on helmet outcomes is lacking. We assessed treatment outcomes for helmet therapy based on insurance status. DESIGN: This was a retrospective data analysis of patients referred to Cranial Technologies, Inc for helmet therapy between 2014-2020 across 21 states. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: There were a total of 211,417 patients referred for helmeting, of whom 141,513 received helmet therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Multivariate regression was used to assess the relationship of insurance status with post-treatment residual flattening, measured by cephalic index (CI) and cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), and treating provider rating of success. RESULTS: Patients with Medicaid were more likely to complete treatment with residual flattening measured by CI and CVAI when compared to patients with private insurance (OR: 1.58, CI: 1.51-1.65, p < 0.001 and OR: 1.21, CI: 1.15-1.28, p < 0.001, respectively). Providers of patients with Medicaid were more likely to give a low rating of success following treatment (OR: 3.25, CI: 2.70-3.92, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study investigating the impact of insurance status on helmet therapy across 21 states found that patients with Medicaid were more likely to experience residual flattening and have lower provider-rated outcomes compared to those with commercial insurance. Given significant caregiver burden posed by helmet therapy, which requires frequent visits and consistent helmet use, caregivers of patients with Medicaid may require greater support to reduce outcome disparities observed here.

Disparities in Access to Cranial Remodeling Orthosis for Deformational Plagiocephaly.

OBJECTIVE: Moderate to severe cases of deformational plagiocephaly (DP) may be treated with cranial remolding orthoses (CRO). This study investigated the socioeconomic disparities in access to care for CRO for DP correction. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of medical records from a single CRO company in Connecticut from 2014 to 2020. METHODS: Demographic variables were collected from all patients. Univariable logistic regressions were used to identify differences for presenting age at consultation, whether CRO was pursued, and length of CRO treatment by insurance payor and household income quartile. RESULTS: Of the 5620 patients identified, 4100 (73.0%) received CRO, with 674 (12.0%) receiving a second helmet. Of those receiving CRO, 1536 (37.5%) had Medicaid insurance while 2558 (62.4%) were commercially insured. Patients on Medicaid were 1.30 times more likely to have delayed presentation (P = .017), while patients from the lowest income quartile were 1.26 1.50 (P < .001) and 1.58 (P < .001) times more likely to have a delayed presentation relative to those in the highest and second-highest income quartiles, respectively. Patients in the highest and second-highest income quartiles were also 1.55 (P < .001) and 1.45 (P < .001) more likely, respectively, to receive CRO after consultation than those from the lowest income quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Lower income and Medicaid-insured patients had delayed presentation for CRO consultation. Those from the lowest income quartile were more likely to never receive CRO than those from wealthier backgrounds. Low socioeconomic status and Medicaid insurance, which can have more restrictive coverage policies for CRO, may result in the delayed treatment of DP.

Flap to Mastectomy Mass: Are Higher Ratios Associated with Greater Breast Reconstruction Satisfaction?

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes compared with prosthetic techniques, but little is known about the relationship between autologous flap mass and patient satisfaction. We hypothesized that a higher differential mass (ratio of flap mass to mastectomy mass) would be associated with greater satisfaction with reconstruction. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020 with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap completed the BREAST-Q survey. Multivariate linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between differential mass and patient satisfaction. Models controlled for body mass index (BMI), age at surgery, reconstruction size preference, number of surgeries, previous surgery failure, whether the patient underwent radiation therapy, and whether reconstruction was unilateral or bilateral. RESULTS: Overall, 45 patients (70 breasts) completed the BREAST-Q survey. Mean age at reconstruction was 52.2 years and mean time to survey completion following surgery was 21.1 months. Most patients (59.4%) desired a smaller breast after reconstruction. The mean differential mass was +26.3% (flap mass greater than mastectomy mass). Differential mass was positively associated with all satisfaction measures with results being significant for satisfaction with breasts scores (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, a higher ratio of autologous flap mass to mastectomy mass was associated with overall higher patient-reported satisfaction. A 1:1 flap to mastectomy mass ratio may not adequately reapproximate desired breast size or shape. Larger autologous flap mass may be favorable for long-term patient satisfaction, and future studies should investigate the relationship between differential mass and breast esthetics.

Predictive Factors of Outcomes in Helmet Therapy for Deformational Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly.

Deformational plagiocephaly and brachycephaly, or abnormal flattening of the infant skull due to external forces, are often managed with orthotic helmet therapy. Although helmet therapy is widely used, the factors that predict poor outcomes are not well characterized. In this study of over 140,000 patients who received helmet therapy, older age and greater severity at presentation, and noncompliance with treatment were each independently associated with worse craniometric and provider-reported outcomes. Each additional point of cranial vault asymmetry index or cephalic index at a presentation is associated with an increased likelihood of residual brachycephaly at completion [odds ratio (OR): 1.067; 95% Cl: 1.058-1.075; P <0.0001 and OR: 2.043; 95% CI: 2.021-2.065; P <0.0001, respectively], whereas each additional point of cranial vault asymmetry index at a presentation associated with increased likelihood of residual asymmetry at completion (OR: 2.148; 95% Cl: 2.118-2.179; P <0.0001). Patients were more likely to have residual brachycephaly or asymmetry with increasing age at treatment initiation (OR: 1.562; 95% CI: 1.524-1.600; P <0.0001 and OR: 1.673; 95% Cl: 1.634-1.713; P <0.0001, respectively, for each additional month of age at initiation). These results highlight a need for prompt referral for helmeting, especially in cases with severe features or when patients present late to care. Potentially modifiable factors are age at helmeting and compliance with treatment protocols, and consideration of these factors may be important for achieving success in some cases.

Facial Trauma Call Reimbursement Patterns Among American Society of Maxillofacial Surgery Members.

Facial trauma accounts for over 3 million emergency room encounters each year in the United States and places significant financial burden on the health care system and surgeons. However, data on facial trauma call practices among plastic surgeons are lacking. We surveyed members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons (ASMS) regarding their experience with facial trauma call. A 27-question online survey was distributed through e-mail to ASMS members. Forty-five ASMS members completed the survey, of whom 64% were required to take facial trauma call and 44% were compensated for call. Respondents in the North-East were less likely [odds ratio (OR): 0.234, confidence interval (CI), 0.054-1.015; P =0.052] to be compensated for taking call, whereas those who worked at level 1 trauma centers were more likely odds ratio: 5.42, CI, 0.892-32.89; P =0.066) to be compensated. Surgeons required to take facial trauma call were 4.646 (CI, 1.203-17.944; P =0.026) times more likely to take call ≥5 days per month. These results highlight a relatively low proportion of plastic surgeons receiving additional compensation for facial trauma call while work at a level 1 trauma center was associated with higher likelihood of compensation. Surgeons in the Northeast may be compensated less frequently than other regions. Plastic surgeons should be aware of these trends, as they decide how to incorporate facial trauma call into their practice.

An Online Calculator for Estimating Breast Implant Volume from Imaging.

Breast implant surgery remains one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Implant exchange can be complicated by unavailability of medical records or implant identification cards. Using chest imaging of 154 breast implants, an algorithm for estimating breast implant volume was generated. Based on four simple measurements and patient body mass index, a free, online calculator was created with a mean error of volume estimate of less than 1 cm3 and a SD of 44 cm3. In instances where a surgeon does not have implant records available but has chest imaging, this online tool can be used to obtain a relatively accurate estimate of implant volume.

Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management of Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: The updated ICD-10 coding system introduced partway through 2015 offers codes with increased granularity for disease and procedure types. This is the first study to use ICD-10 codes to investigate disparities in the surgical management for craniosynostosis. METHODS: Using the Kids' Inpatient Database univariable analyses were performed to compare the relative odds of undergoing strip craniectomy, either endoscopic (ESC) or open (OSC), or calvarial vault remodeling (CVR) based on a variety of demographic and hospital-level variables. RESULTS: Of the 2,874 patients identified, 2,352 underwent CVR while 522 underwent SC. Of those undergoing SC, 295 and 228 had an endoscopic and open procedure, respectively. A greater proportion of patients who had private insurance (58.14% versus 47.49%) or were self-pay (8.06% versus 6.28%) underwent SC, whereas a higher percentage who were covered under Medicaid (46.23% versus 32.8%; P < 0.001) received CVR. ESC patients were 2.16 times more likely to have private insurance and 2.07 times more likely to be from the highest income quartile compared to OSC patients. However, there were no differences in terms of insurance type or income level between those undergoing CVR compared to OSC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the difference between CVR and SC can be attributed to the difference in the endoscopic versus open approaches to SC. Although the socioeconomic disparities persisted in the comparison between ESC and OSC, with patients receiving ESC coming from wealthier and commercially insured families, the same differences were not observed when comparing CVR with OSC.