Reverse Wafer Procedure for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.

Ulnar impaction syndrome occurs when excessive load across the ulnocarpal joints results in pathologic changes, especially over the articular surface of the ulnar head and proximal ulnar corner of the lunate. The 2 main surgical options in ulnar impaction syndrome are ulnar shortening osteotomy and wafer procedure, whether open or arthroscopically, to decompress the ulnocarpal joint load. However, all of these techniques have their shortcomings and drawbacks. The current study demonstrates a novel technique to decompress the ulnocarpal joint load: the "reverse wafer procedure" for ulnar impaction syndrome. In this surgical technique, we resected the proximal ulnar side of the lunate instead of partial resection of the thin wafer of the distal ulnar head dome in the standard wafer procedure. This technique avoids iatrogenic central tear of triangular fibrocartilage and distal radioulnar joint portal arthroscopy, which is technically demanding while preserving the distal radioulnar joint.

The heart-lung machine in major limb replantation: Report of two cases.

Replantation of amputated limbs after long ischemic hours almost always comes with reperfusion syndrome and poor outcomes. An ischemic time of greater than 6 h is often considered unsuitable for major limb replantation. However, usage of extracorporeal perfusion has been shown to prolong the viability of major limbs in animal studies. The aim of this report is to show that extracorporeal perfusion with cardiopulmonary bypass machine (CPBM) is a safe and reliable technique in improving limb survival as illustrated by our cases. We report two cases of successful major limb replantation with late presentation. One case involved a 31-year-old man with shoulder disarticulation and the other involved a 30-year-old man sustained proximal transtibial amputation. Both patients, who were generally fit, were involved in major road traffic accidents. The amputated segments were connected to a CPBM to expedite reperfusion and to flush away anaerobic metabolic products. The major vessels were cannulated and connected to a bypass machine that was initially primed with heparinized saline and perfused with packed cells at 100% oxygen concentration. The perfusion was carried out at 35°C with low pressure to prevent edema and low flow to reduce reperfusion injury. Venous blood was drained completely before replantation. Total ischemia times were 7 h 40 min and 9 h, respectively. No evidences of perioperative reperfusion syndrome were seen. Both of the replanted limbs survived and patients had regained better-than-expected limb functional outcomes at 5-year and 2-year follow-up, respectively. CPBM may be safely used in major replantation surgery to enhance limb survival and therefore warrants further research.

Successful ankle replantation in two cases with different presentations.

We report our experience of treating two patients with ankle amputation with different presentations. The first case was a clean-cut sharp amputation. The second case was an avulsion injury following a motor vehicle accident in a patient who arrived 8 hours after the injury. Replantation was successful in both cases. In avulsion injuries, a secondary operation for wound coverage is required at a later stage. With good strategy and a support team, encouraging limb survival outcomes are possible post-replantation.