Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 37(12): 9427-9440, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37676323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold-standard bariatric procedure with proven efficacy in morbidly obese populations. While the short-term benefits of LRYGB have been well-documented, durable weight loss and long-term resolution of obesity-related comorbidities have been less clearly described. METHODS: This single-center study prospectively reports weight loss and comorbidity resolution in patients undergoing LRYGB between August 2001 and September 2007 with at least 15-year follow-up. Data were collected at the time of surgery; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively; and then annually thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 486 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were predominantly female (88.7%), and the median age was 36.0 [IQR 29.0-45.0] years. Patients were ethnically diverse, including Black/African American (43.6%), White/Caucasian (35.0%), Hispanic (18.3%), and other backgrounds (3.1%). Mean preoperative weight and body mass index were 133.0 ± 21.9 kg and 48.4 ± 6.5 kg/m2, and the median number of comorbidities was 6.0 [IQR 4.0-7.0]. Follow-up rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 75.3%, 37.2%, 35.2%, and 18.9%, respectively. On average, maximum percentage total weight loss (%TWL) occurred 2 years postoperatively (- 36.2 ± 9.5%), and ≥ 25% TWL was consistently achieved at 1, 5, 10, and 15-year time intervals (- 28.0 ± 13.0% at 15 years). Patients with comorbidities experienced improvement or resolution of their conditions within 1 year, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (83/84, 98.8%), obstructive sleep apnea (112/116, 96.6%), hypertension (142/150, 94.7%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (217/223, 97.3%). Rates of improved/resolved comorbidities remained consistently high through at least 10 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: LRYGB provides durable weight loss for at least 15 years after surgery, with stable average relative weight loss of approximately 25% from baseline. This outcome corresponds with sustainable resolution of obesity-related comorbidities for at least 10 years after the initial operation.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirurgia , Redução de Peso , Comorbidade , Laparoscopia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gastrectomia/métodos
3.
Surg Endosc ; 37(3): 2224-2238, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35879574

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a public health concern among adolescents and young adults. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and has been increasingly utilized in young patients. Long-term outcomes data for bariatric surgery in this age group are limited. METHODS: This is a single-institution, prospective analysis of 167 patients aged 15-24 years who underwent one of three laparoscopic bariatric procedures between 2001 and 2019: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB, n = 71), adjustable gastric banding (LAGB, n = 22), and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG, n = 74). Longitudinal weight and body mass index (BMI) measurements were compared to evaluate patterns of weight loss. RESULTS: All operations were completed laparoscopically using the same clinical pathways. Patients were predominantly female (82.6%), had a median age of 22.0 [Q1-Q3 20.0-23.0] years, and had a mean presurgical BMI of 48.5 ± 6.5 kg/m2 (range 38.4-68.1 kg/m2). All procedures produced significant weight loss by 1 year, peak weight loss by 2 years, and modest weight regain after 5 years. Mean percent weight/BMI losses at 5 years for LRYGB, LAGB, and LSG were - 36.7 ± 10.8%, - 14.5 ± 15.3%, and - 25.1 ± 13.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). LRYGB patients were most likely to achieve ≥ 25% weight loss at 1, 3, and 5 years and maintained significant average weight loss for more than 15 years after surgery. Reoperations were procedure-specific, with LAGB, LRYGB, and LSG having the highest, middle, and lowest reoperation rates, respectively (40.9% vs. 16.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All procedures provided significant and durable weight loss. LRYGB patients achieved the best and most sustained weight loss. LSG patients experienced second-best weight loss between 1 and 5 years, with lowest chance of reoperation. LAGB patients had the least weight loss and the highest reoperation rate. Compared to other factors, type of bariatric procedure was independently predictive of successful weight loss over time. More studies with long-term follow-up are needed.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Gastroplastia , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Obesidade Infantil , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Adolescente , Feminino , Masculino , Gastroplastia/métodos , Seguimentos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obesidade Infantil/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Redução de Peso
4.
Surg Endosc ; 35(9): 5315-5321, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) still remains the gold-standard bariatric procedure. Short-term weight loss and improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) after LRYGB are well-documented. Little data are available on long-term weight loss and continued remission of DM2 in these patients. METHODS: This study reports on weight loss and remission of DM2 in 576 consecutive patients who underwent primary LRYGB between August 2001 and August 2009 with at least 10-year follow up. All patients were treated at a single institution by a single surgeon. All data were collected and entered into the database prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients were included in the study. Patients' mean age was 38.2 ± 10.9 years and females represented 88.2% of patients. Patients' ethnicity was diverse, including African Americans (44.4%), Caucasians (34.0%), Hispanics (18.1%), and 3.5% from other backgrounds. On average, there were 6.9 ± 2.7 comorbidities per patient and DM2 was initially present in 150/576 patients (26.0%). Mean preoperative weight and BMI were 132.4 ± 22.0 kg and 48.3 ± 6.7 kg/m2, respectively. Ten-year follow-up reporting rate was 145/576 (25.2%). Maximum weight loss occurred at 18 months (mean weight 83.4 ± 16.5 kg, mean BMI 30.5 ± kg/m2). At 10 years, mean weight was maintained at 94.8 ± 20.5 kg and mean BMI was 34.3 ± 6.8 kg/m2. The average weight regain between one and ten years was 8.27 kg. Among patients with preoperative DM2, continued remission of DM2 at 10 years occurred in 19/32 (59.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: LRYGB provides durable long-term weight loss, as well as successful remission of DM2 at 10 years. More long-term follow-up studies evaluating weight loss and comorbidities extending beyond the initial 10-year period are needed. Such studies are essential for projecting late outcomes of LRYGB, particularly in younger patients with life expectancy exceeding several decades.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
5.
Surg Endosc ; 34(5): 2197-2203, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The morbidly obese (MO) patient presents a unique challenge to pain control in the postoperative period due to associated comorbidities and the amplified impact of opiates. In order to reduce potential complications associated with narcotic use in the MO patient, multimodal analgesia has been advocated. In this study, we examined the effect of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block (LG TAP) for further optimizing multimodal pain control. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 140 consecutive patients undergoing LSG without TAP block (pre-TAP group) compared to 131 patients undergoing LSG with LGTAP (TAP group). All operations were performed laparoscopically utilizing uniform clinical pathways. Baseline characteristics for both groups were comparable. Both groups received standardized anesthesia. Outcomes included time to postoperative ambulation, pain scores, PCA volume, length of hospital stay, utilization of oral opiate medications, and return to activity (RTA). RESULTS: Pre-TAP versus TAP groups were comparable, mean age 42 years (p = 0.99), women 81.4% versus 87.8% (p = 0.148), mean BMI (kg/m2) 46 versus 45 (p = 0.394). Most patients ambulated within 2 h after arrival to the floor (87.9% vs. 76.3%, p = 0.013). On postoperative day (POD) 1, mean reported pain score (0-10) was 4.50 vs. 5.06 (p = 0.063) and a mean PCA morphine used for 24 h was 26.3 mL versus 26 mL, p = 0.35. Mean days of postoperative opiate medication were 2.19 versus 1.24 (p < 0.001). Return to activity was 2.81 versus 2.08 days (p < 0.001). When controlled for age, BMI, OR time, PCA volume used, and average pain score, TAP block was an independent predictor of earlier return to activities (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LGTAP block following LSG is an additional valuable modality of pain control in the perioperative period. Our study shows that TAP block is associated with an earlier RTA and decreased opiate use in patients undergoing LSG.


Assuntos
Músculos Abdominais/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Int J Surg ; 54(Pt A): 163-169, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29684667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have established that race and socioeconomic factors may influence weight loss after bariatric surgery. Few studies have focused on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The objective of this study is to determine if demographic factors may predict postoperative weight loss following LSG. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on 713 consecutive primary LSG operations performed with the same technique between February 2010 and May 2016 by a single surgeon (PG) were analyzed. Multiple regression analysis was done to determine if gender, race, or socioeconomic factors such as insurance and employment status correlated with postoperative weight loss. The presence of chronic comorbidities affecting quality of life such as Type II Diabetes and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) were also recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: All studied groups had similar preoperative body mass index (BMI) (mean 46 kg/m2). Race was not significantly associated with weight loss at any postoperative interval. Male gender was associated with increased weight loss through the first three months (48.2 ±â€¯12.5 lbs vs. 40.5 ±â€¯11 lbs; p = 0.0001). Patients with diabetes had significantly less weight loss at the 6 through 18 month intervals (50.4 ±â€¯17.9 lbs vs. 59.6 ±â€¯15.6 lbs at six months; p = 0.00032; 53.3 ±â€¯25.4lbs vs. 80.5 ±â€¯31.3lbs at 18 months; p = 0.008). Patients with obstructive sleep apnea had significantly less weight loss at the two-year interval (57.5 ±â€¯29.2 lbs) vs. those without obstructive sleep apnea (69.6 ±â€¯23.5 lbs; p = 0.047). Those with Medicare compared to Medicaid or commercial insurance had decreased weight loss through the first year (52.8 ±â€¯20.8 lbs vs. 71.4 ±â€¯26.4 lbs vs. 68.6 ±â€¯24.7 lbs; p = 0.0496). Notably, a higher percentage of patients in the Medicare insurance group were also diabetic and had OSA (65% vs. 34% vs. 36%; p = 0.002; 80% vs. 55% vs. 57%; p = 0.01). Finally, those patients who were students had the greatest weight loss at two years postoperatively with the least weight loss seen in retired patients followed by those on disability (108.0 ±â€¯21.5 lbs vs. 26.0 lbs vs. 46.0 ±â€¯19.7 lbs; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Several demographic factors including comorbidities, insurance status, and employment may significantly affect weight loss patterns following LSG. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether demographic differences impact long term weight loss. Differences in outcomes based on patient demographics may be beneficial in the planning of the allocation of healthcare resources.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Emprego , Feminino , Gastrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Regressão , Classe Social , Resultado do Tratamento , Aumento de Peso
7.
JSLS ; 20(3)2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27667914

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have established a 1.7-4.33% readmission rate for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a rate that falls within the reported range for other bariatric procedures. The current report describes the incidence of 30-day readmission after primary LSG procedures performed at a single bariatric center of excellence (COE) and examines factors that may be associated with readmission. METHODS: Data on 343 consecutive LSG operations performed from February 2010 to May 2014 by a single surgeon (PG) were analyzed. Patients readmitted within 30 d were compared to the remaining patients by using Student's t test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. RESULTS: All LSGs were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to open procedures. There were no reoperations, leaks, perioperative hemorrhages, or mortalities. Twelve patients (3.5%) were readmitted; 1 was readmitted twice. There were no identified risk factors for readmission, including patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors. Notably, 7 (7%) readmissions occurred in the initial 100 patients and 5 (2%) in the remaining 243 patients (P = .04). Clinical pathways were modified after the initial 100 patients; routine contrast esophagograms were no longer performed, and a 1-day routine postoperative stay was adopted. Operative time also decreased from 94.2 ± 23.8 to 78.2 ± 20.0 min (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rates after LSG remain in a range similar to those described for other laparoscopic bariatric procedures. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify patterns of complications and readmissions in patients undergoing LSG that may differ from other bariatric procedures.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA