Testing of the therapist to reduce maladaptive interactional patterns: Categorizing patients' tests.

OBJECTIVE: This empirical study undertakes a categorization of the core concept of Control Mastery Theory: mostly unconscious testing of pathogenic beliefs that patients exhibit in relating to their therapist to work on their problems. The focus lays on latent meanings of manifest tests. METHOD: We qualitatively analyze transcripts of 172 psychotherapy sessions with 23 patients for sequences in which significant patient-therapist interactions occur, and systematize identified tests into thematic categories based on what tests intent to achieve (ICC = .68). Guided by theory, the analysis is attending to complexity, individuality, and the unconscious. RESULTS: Tests circle around striving for independence, deserving/self-worth, acceptance, and entitlement. Individual tests have various underlying meanings, are interrelated, and may be multidimensional. CONCLUSION: Meanings of tests must be confirmed within the psychotherapeutic process. Incorporating the treating clinician thus seems important.

Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in a face-to-face versus videoconferencing setting: A single case study.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the coronavirus pandemic and crisis, psychotherapists around the world were forced to switch to video- or tele-based treatments overnight. To date, only a few studies on the effectiveness of video-based psychodynamic psychotherapy via the Internet exist. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to examine symptom improvement, therapeutic relationship, nonverbal synchrony processes, and intersession processes within a systematic single case design and compare face-to-face to video-based approaches in long-term psychodynamic-oriented psychotherapy. METHODS: We examined 85 sessions of a client with major depression whose psychodynamic psychotherapy changed from a face-to-face setting to a video-based setting. Video recordings were analyzed using motion energy analysis, and nonverbal synchrony was computed using a surrogate synchrony approach. Time series analyses were performed to analyze changes in symptom severity, therapeutic relationship, and intersession processes. RESULTS: The results showed that symptom severity improved descriptively, but not significantly, across the entire course of psychotherapy. There were significant differences, however, in the therapeutic relationship, intersession experiences, and synchronous behavior between the face-to-face and video-based settings. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the presented methodology is well situated to investigate the question whether psychodynamic psychotherapy in video-based setting works in the sameway as in a face-to-face setting.

Passing patients' tests-But how? An analysis of therapists' helping skills in response to patient testing.

According to control mastery theory, patients in psychotherapy try to master their problems by disconfirming their pathogenic beliefs. This can be done by testing the therapist. So far, there is hardly any evidence on what concrete interventions or statements of therapists are specifically helpful in passing those tests. In our study, we analyzed the verbal utterances of therapists in test situations to determine whether there is a difference in statements used for passing or failing tests. A total of 168 session transcripts of 21 patients were selected from a total of six therapists, two each in psychoanalytic therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy. Test situations were identified, and therapist responses were coded using the helping skills system. There were significant differences in the therapists' reactions to test situations. In particular, closed questions, approval, interpretation, and reflection of the patients' feelings by therapists were associated with a high probability of passing tests. These findings can especially support therapists-in-training to obtain an orientation on how to deal with their patients' test situations that may be perceived as challenging and are important for therapy success while respecting the individuality of their patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Effects of the therapist's statements on the patient's outcome and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review.

This systematic review summarizes articles that examined the effects of the psychotherapist's statements on the outcome of the patient and the therapeutic alliance. The databases PsychINFO, PSYNDEX, PubMed, and PsychARTICLES were searched, and English peer-reviewed articles were included. Participants should be adult patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnosis who were receiving evidence-based psychotherapy in an individual setting. Studies with a standardized, observer-based measurement of the therapist's verbal utterances on the basis of verbatim transcripts of therapy sessions were included. Furthermore, there should be a standardized measurement of the symptom outcome or a measurement of the therapeutic alliance. The 10 included articles showed that supportive and exploratory statements and addressing aspects in the therapeutic relationship were perceived as positive regarding symptom outcome. Negative effects were particularly evident with controlling and challenging statements of the therapist. Regarding the therapeutic alliance, both positive and negative as well as nonsignificant results were obtained. The results of this review suggest that the question of which statements by therapists correlate positively or negatively with the outcome of therapy and the therapeutic alliance cannot be answered unequivocally and must be applied to more individual and specific situations.