Validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify the validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforation by comparing the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open emergency surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforation. Patients were categorized into two groups: the laparoscopic group who underwent laparoscopic surgery, and the open group who underwent laparotomy. Clinical and operative outcomes between the two groups were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were included in the study. There were 66 and 153 patients with small bowel and colorectal perforations, respectively. The median operative time in the laparoscopic group was shorter than that in the open group (126 min vs. 146 min, p = .049). The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (50.4 mL vs. 400.1 mL, p < .001). The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in the open group (20.0% vs. 66.5%, p < .001), especially wound infection (0% vs. 26.3%, p = .002). Median hospital stays were 14 days and 24 days in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively (p < .001). In the laparoscopic group, hospital mortality was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach for small bowel and colorectal perforation in an emergency setting is a safe procedure in carefully selected patients and may contribute to decreased intraoperative blood loss, shortened hospital stay, and decreased incidence of postoperative complications, especially wound infection.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery.

Objectives: Colorectal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates after surgery. We investigated various clinical features of patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal perforation and explored the risk factors for postoperative complications and hospital mortality. Methods: Data from 147 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal perforation were retrospectively reviewed. We investigated various clinical and operative factors, including inflammation-based prognostic scores (IBPSs), and evaluated the risk factors for postoperative complications and hospital mortality due to colorectal perforation. Results: Among 147 patients, the most frequent postoperative complication was wound infection (32 cases, 21.8%), followed by intra-abdominal abscesses (27 cases, 18.4%) after surgery for colorectal perforation. Time from onset to surgery ≥ 2 days (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.810, p = 0.0383) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) < 30 (HR = 3.190, p = 0.0488) were identified as risk factors for intra-abdominal abscess, while neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 6.15 (HR = 5.020, p = 0.0009) was identified as a risk factor for wound infection. Time from onset to surgery ≥ 2 days (HR = 7.713, p = 0.0492), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) (HR = 10.98, p = 0.0281), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) < 144 (HR = 18.84, p = 0.0190) were independent predictive factors for hospital mortality. Conclusions: Time from onset to surgery and IBPSs such as PNI, NLR, and PLR, may be associated with postoperative complications and hospital mortality due to colorectal perforation.

Initial Learning Curve and Stereotypical Use of Extra Arm During da Vinci Chest Procedures of McKeown Esophagectomy.

Objective: McKeown esophagectomy facilitates extensive lymphadenectomy for the optimal management of esophageal cancer. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) was introduced in an attempt to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. The da Vinci System has 3 active robotic arms in addition to the camera scope, and an extra robotic arm (ERA) is generally used to maintain a fine and stable operative field. However, the optimal use of an ERA has not been documented. In addition, the learning curve of the RAE using the da Vinci System remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal use of an ERA in association with the initial learning curve of robotic McKeown esophagectomy with extremely extensive lymphadenectomy. Methods: We reviewed 81 consecutive patients who underwent RAE. To determine whether stereotypical use of an ERA after establishment of its optimal use accounted for the learning curve, we measured the duration of 14 steps and the duration when performed with optimal use of an ERA in the corresponding step by reviewing video-recorded procedures. We then calculated the ratio as the degree of stereotypical use of the ERA during the da Vinci chest procedures. Results: The cumulative sum method showed that the learning curve required 27 cases of RAE. In addition, stereotypical use of the ERA was significantly associated with the learning curve of RAE. Conclusions: Establishment of optimal use of an ERA could help to accelerate the learning curve in da Vinci chest procedures during McKeown esophagectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy.

Modification of the Thermal Spread by the Blade Shape of an Ultrasonically Activated Device.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on the spread of thermal damage from different blade shapes of ultrasonically activated devices (USADs) used during minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: In vivo experiments using pig arteries, nerves, and mesentery were used to compare the thermal spread of two different blade types of USADs, non-tapered and tapered, under the same conditions. The tissue temperatures were monitored using a high-resolution infrared thermographic camera and calculated using an image analysis program. The spread of heat denaturation was measured histologically. RESULTS: The temperature was greater at the sides with greater curvature when non-tapered USADs were activated (artery, 1 s, 2 mm: - 0.92 ± 0.5 °C vs. - 0.44 ± 0.5 °C, P = 0.022). This effect was more prominent in the tapered type (artery, 1 s, 0/1/2 mm: 9.14 ± 3.7 °C vs. 28.3 ± 16.2 °C/0.5 ± 1.4 °C vs. 9.76 ± 6.2 °C/ - 0.12 ± 0.9 °C vs. 1.44 ± 1.9 °C, P = 0.044/0.016/0.038, respectively). The temperatures in the tapered USAD were significantly higher at some time- and distance-points than those in a non-tapered USAD (artery, 1 s, 0 mm, Less/1 s, 1 mm, Gre: 4.2 ± 2.9 °C vs. 9.14 ± 3.7 °C /0.36 ± 0.5 °C vs. 9.76 ± 6.2 °C, P = 0.047/0.027; nerve, 2 s, 0 mm, Gre: 6.54 ± 3.9 °C vs. 17.66 ± 6.2 °C, P = 0.012). A three-directional study revealed the thermal spread of the mesentery was greatest at the tip side of the non-tapered type USAD (4.55 ± 2.53 °C vs. 12.43 ± 4.03 °C/12.43 ± 4.03 °C vs. 5.04 ± 1.91 °C, P = 0.003/0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The thermal spread changed according to the blade shape of the USAD. This knowledge can be applied to more meticulous and complicated procedures, reducing surgical morbidity.

Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally robotic Billroth I gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Delta-shaped anastomosis has been recognized as a method of intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. However, the technical aspects and outcomes of the delta-shaped anastomosis in totally robotic distal gastrectomy have never been reported. METHODS: A single-institutional, non-randomized, retrospective study was performed between 2009 and 2013. During the study period, 47 patients underwent robotic distal gastrectomy followed by robotic delta-shaped Billroth I reconstruction, and 165 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy followed by laparoscopic delta-shaped Billroth I reconstruction. After 64 were excluded because of insufficient intraoperative video, 43 patients in the robotic group and 105 patients in the laparoscopic group were enrolled in the study. Short-term outcomes were determined from medical records and full-length operative videos. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the robotic and laparoscopic groups in terms of morbidity (4.7% vs 3.8%), anastomosis-related complications (0% vs 1.0%), non-anastomosis-related complications (2.3% vs 0%), or systemic complications (2.3% vs 0%). Time for reconstruction did not vary between the robotic group (16.6 min [8.8-42.9 min]) and the laparoscopic group (15.8 min [7.2-41.0 min]). There was no mortality in this series. In the conventional group, the morbidity rate was 3.8%. The anastomosis-related complication rate was 1.0% in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Given the excellent short-term outcomes related to anastomosis, delta-shaped anastomosis after robotic distal gastrectomy was at least as feasible and safe as delta-shaped anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.