Applying the Suprainguinal Approach of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Surgical Anesthesia in a Patient Undergoing Emergency Femoral Thrombectomy: A Case Report.

We present the first documented case of achieving surgical anesthesia for a vascular surgery using the suprainguinal approach of the fascia iliaca compartment block (SFICB), in a patient with severe comorbidities from the cardiovascular system. More specifically, a male elderly patient with a history of cardiac amyloidosis, severe aortic stenosis, and coronary artery disease, was in need of emergent thrombectomy due to acute lower limb ischemia. During the evaluation of this patient, general and neuraxial anesthesia were both considered. However, the former would expose him to the risk of myocardial ischemia and other complications due to cardiovascular instability caused by the general anesthetic agents while the latter was absolutely contraindicated due to recent clopidogrel use and the specific pathophysiology changes induced by cardiac amyloidosis. Thus, a peripheral nerve block was deemed to be the best option in this case. SFICB, despite being challenging, could offer adequate analgesic results so it was the anesthetic technique of choice. The surgery was completed and the patient recovered appropriately. The aim of this report is to discuss the specific anesthetic considerations of this case, highlight the ability of SFICB to achieve surgical anesthesia in vascular surgeries, and increase familiarity with the procedure.

Pre-Emptive Embolization of the Aneurysm Sac or Aortic Side Branches in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: To investigate outcomes of pre-emptive embolization of the aneurysm sac or aortic side branches in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: The review was reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 with a preregistered protocol. Bibliographic sources (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL) were searched using subject headings and free text terms. Randomized controlled trials comparing EVAR with versus without embolization were included. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) applying the Mantel-Haenszel method. Continuous outcomes were summarized using mean difference (MD) and 95% CI applying the inverse variance method. The certainty of evidence was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Version 2 of the Cochrane tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Trial sequential analysis assumed alpha = 5% and power = 80%. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials were included. No significant difference was found in aneurysm-related mortality (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03), overall mortality (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.42-8.13), aneurysm rupture (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03), type II endoleak-related reintervention (RD -0.07, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.06), procedure time (MD 20.12, 95% CI -11.54 to 51.77), or fluoroscopy time (MD 11.17, 95% CI -11.22 to 33.56). Patients with pre-emptive embolization had significantly lower odds of type II endoleak (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78) and sac expansion (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52). The risk of bias was high for all outcomes. The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes, except for type II endoleak, for which it was low. Trial sequential analysis showed an inconclusive result for overall mortality and type II endoleak-related reintervention but confirmed the advantage of embolization in reducing type II endoleak and sac expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Limited, low certainty data suggest pre-emptive embolization confers no clinical benefits in EVAR.

A systematic review of therapies for aortobronchial fistulae.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to summarize epidemiologic data about aortobronchial fistulae and compare outcomes (mortality, recurrence, reoperation) of open, staged, and endovascular repair of aortobronchial fistula. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify eligible studies published between January 1999 and December 2019. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus databases were used as search engines. Eligible studies included articles reporting postoperative outcomes (death/follow-up). Literature review revealed only case reports and small case series, and thus, only descriptive data with data heterogeneity were available. The corresponding authors were contacted to provide additional information or outcome updates (recurrence/reoperation/death). RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients (90 studies) underwent 271 procedures (including redo procedures and staged procedures). Most of the patients were treated by endovascular means (72.42%). Open surgical repair was performed in 21.96% and staged procedures in 5.6%. Aortobronchial fistulae were located most often in the descending thoracic aorta (zone 3 or 4) (64.6%) and in zone 2 (23.8%). Fourteen percent of aortobronchial fistulae developed after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. Recurrence or infection occurred in 20% (43) patients. Recurrences were, to some extent, associated with the presence of endoleak. Long-term antibiotic administration (>1 month) was instituted in 63 patients (29.4%), whereas 90 patients (42%) did not receive antibiotics beyond hospitalization. From the remaining 61 patients, 3 received lifelong antibiotics and for 58 patients data were not available. Considering outcomes, the mean follow-up was 25.1 months (0-188 months) and not significantly different among treatments. LIMITATIONS: Literature review has revealed only case reports and small case series, and thus, only descriptive data were available. Randomized controlled trials are not available due to the rarity of the disease, which significantly decreases the power of the present study. Also, this study reflects significant data heterogeneity due to the nature of the analyzed manuscripts and would benefit from large patient cohort studies that have not been conducted till today. CONCLUSIONS: Aortobronchial fistula is a complex disease. Endoleaks may be involved in the development and the recurrence process, and they should not be disregarded. Considering major outcomes (length of follow-up), the available treating strategies are equal, and thus, surgeons should feel confident to apply the treatment of their choice, keeping in mind their experience, patient's age, and clinical condition.

Ultrasonographic hemodynamical and epidemiological factors in advancement of clinical manifestations in primary varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Primary varicose veins (PVV) represent the most prominent clinical manifestation of chronic venous disease (CVD) and has a complex pathophysiological background. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of sonographic hemodynamical and contemporary epidemiological factors on the clinical severity of PVV. METHODS: We analyzed the sonographic hemodynamical and clinical parameters from 159 consecutive CVD patients and 233 lower limbs with PVV of clinical stages C2, C3 and C4. Univariate and logistic regression analysis was performed between patients of C2 (N.=70 - 30.0%) and C3 - 4 stages and between subgroups C3 (N.=101 - 43.3%) and C4 (N.=62 - 26.6%). RESULTS: Reflux of common femoral vein and saphenofemoral junction was detected in 43.3% and 65.7%. High venous reflux rates were found at the great saphenous above and below knee (90.1% - 53.2%) and in Cockett perforators (80.5%). Logistic regression revealed that factors associated with the symptomatic C3; 4 stages were the duration of disease >10 years (P=0.015, insufficiency in two or more perforators (P<0.001) and history of 2 pregnancies (P=0.001). Analysis C3 vs. C4 showed that insufficiency in two or more perforators increased the likelihood of advanced C4 clinical stage by 2.2 times, (P=0.037). An additional significant factor was the presence of at least one incompetent Cockett perforator. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical severity of PVV is correlated with a plethora of complex anatomical, hemodynamical and epidemiological factors. Insufficiency in two or more perforators seems to play the most important role and this highlights the value of preoperative venous ultrasound mapping.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Bifurcated Stent Grafts in Patients with Narrow Versus Regular Aortic Bifurcation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered as a risk factor for endograft limb thrombosis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of narrow aortic bifurcation on outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. We searched electronic bibliographic databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) and free-text terms to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of EVAR in patients with NAB versus those with regular aortic bifurcation. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) and those of continuous outcomes using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI). To account for expected heterogeneity, the random-effects model was applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Six observational studies were included, reporting a total of 2,673 patients (412 with NAR and 2,261 with friendly anatomy). Perioperative mortality was similar between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.30-4.34, P = 0.85, I2 = 0%). Limb stenosis and kinking requiring additional intraoperative procedures was significantly more common among patients with NAB (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.16-4.22, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Nevertheless, 30-day reintervention rate was similar between the groups, as was the rate of limb occlusion during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that at the expense of significantly more intraoperative additional procedures, EVAR with bifurcated devices can be safely performed in patients with NAB.

Cilostazol Mediates Immune Responses and Affects Angiogenesis During the Acute Phase of Hind Limb Ischemia in a Mouse Model.

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is a drug of choice for the treatment of intermittent claudication that also affects innate and adaptive immune cells. The purpose of our study was the evaluation of cilostazol's impact on the immune and angiogenic response in murine models of hind limb ischemia. METHODS: We used 108 immunodeficient NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J mice and 108 wild-type CB17 mice. At day 0 (D0), all animals underwent hind limb ischemia. Half of them in both groups received daily cilostazol starting at D0 and for the next 7 postoperative days, while the rest of them served as controls, receiving vehicle. Interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interferon γ (IFN-γ) serum concentrations were measured by flow cytometry on postsurgery days D1, D3, D5, and D7. On D7, both groups underwent positron emission tomography scan with 68Ga-RGD. Mice were euthanatized and gastrocnemius muscles were obtained for histological evaluation. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant augmentation (P < .05) in IL-4, IL-10, IL-6, and IFN-γ concentrations in treated CB17 animals, while IL-2 was significantly suppressed. Significant difference was detected between the CiBisch and Bisch groups on D1 and D7 (P < .05) in CD31 staining. In treated NOD.CB17 animals, TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ presented significant augmentation, while 68Ga-NODAGA-RGDfK uptake and CD31 expression were found significantly lower for both legs in comparison to the control. CONCLUSION: Cilostazol seems to significantly increase angiogenesis in wild-type animals during the first postoperational week. It also influences immune cells, altering the type of immune response by promoting anti-inflammatory cytokine production in wild-type animals, while it helps toward inflammation regression in immunodeficient animals.

Frozen Elephant Trunk: An Alternative Surgical Weapon Against Extensive Thoracic Aorta Disease. A Three-Year Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conventional open total arch replacement is the treatment of choice for surgical aortic arch pathologies. However, it is a two-stage procedure related to high cumulative and interval mortality rates. Hybrid type III aortic arch reconstruction, the so-called "frozen elephant trunk" is a one-stage alternative approach. METHODS: A meta-analysis and detailed review of the literature published from January 2013 until December 2016, concerning frozen elephant trunk hybrid approach was conducted and data for morbidity and mortality rates were extracted. RESULTS: Among 989 patients included, the pooled 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 5.04% (95%CI=1.13-10.74), stroke rate was 2.38% (95%CI=0.13-6.30), and the irreversible paraplegia due to spinal cord injury rate was 0.63% (95%CI=0.00-2.73). Finally, the pooled cumulative survival at 1year was remarkably high (86.7%, 95%CI=81.08-92.90). CONCLUSIONS: Frozen elephant trunk is a safe alternative to conventional elephant trunk repair for extensive aortic arch pathologies with acceptable short- and mid-term results, avoiding the interval mortality hazard.

Open versus endovascular treatment of subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare open and endovascular treatment of patients with subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease (SAAD) as far as early and late outcomes are concerned. METHODS: A systematic literature review conforming to established criteria was conducted to identify eligible articles published before January 2018. The following online search engines were used: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (search conducted between December 2017 and January 2018). Eligible studies compared early and late major outcomes between open and endovascular therapy for patients suffering from SAAD. RESULTS: Overall, seven clinical studies included 731 patients undergoing 760 procedures in total (297 endovascular and 463 open procedures). The majority of procedures (99.7%) referred to symptomatic patients, and more patients undergoing open surgery had an occlusion compared with patients undergoing endovascular repair, the majority of whom had a stenosis. Regarding early outcomes (30-day death, cardiac events, technical success, and central nervous system events), there was no difference between the two methods. Only peripheral nervous system complications were more prevalent in patients undergoing open repair (odds ratio [OR], 7.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.142-22.921; P = .001). Regarding late outcomes, open repair was associated with significantly higher 1-year (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.954-9.619; P = .0003), 3-year (OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 2.881-11.167; P < .0001), and 5-year (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.906-9.567; P = .0004) primary patency rates compared with endovascular therapy. However, 5-year freedom from recurrent symptoms as well as 5-year overall survival showed no difference. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair and endovascular repair in patients with SAAD do not show any difference concerning the majority of early major outcomes, although more patients undergoing open repair had an occlusion. However, open surgery seems to prevail regarding long-term primary patency, although long-term survival and freedom from recurrent symptoms show no difference.

Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Stenting of Aortic Endograft Limb Occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous stenting for the management of chronic ischemia caused by endograft limb occlusion following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study investigating all patients who underwent percutaneous endovascular covered or bare metal stent placement for the management of intermittent claudication (IC) or critical limb ischemia following EVAR limb occlusion, between January 2010 and October 2017. Cases suffering from acute limb ischemia were treated surgically and were excluded from the analysis. Primary outcome measures were technical success and symptoms-free interval. Secondary outcome measures included clinically driven target-lesion reintervention (TLR)-free survival, primary patency, and complication rates. RESULTS: Of 29 limb occlusions, 11 limbs (11 patients; 100% male; mean age: 71.6 ± 6.9 years) were treated percutaneously and were included in the study. The majority suffered from IC (10/11; 90.9%) with a single case of rest pain. Technical success was obtained in 10 patients (90%). No major complications occurred. Mean follow-up time was 37.6 ± 25.7 months. Stent grafts were mainly used, while and in 2 cases (18.18%), only nitinol bare stents were deployed. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, both symptoms-free interval and primary patency were 83.33% in up to 5 years follow-up. TLR-free survival was 100% at 5 years, as 2 cases of claudication relapse were managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous stenting for the management chronic ischemia due to EVAR limb occlusion is feasible and safe, with satisfactory long-term outcomes. Careful patient selection warrants clinical success.

Aortic Arch Reconstruction: Are Hybrid Debranching Procedures a Good Choice?

INTRODUCTION: Conventional open total arch replacement is the treatment of choice for surgical aortic arch pathologies. However, it is an invasive procedure, requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest leading to significant morbidity and mortality rates. Hybrid aortic arch debranching procedures without (type I) or with (type II) ascending aorta replacement seek to limit operative, bypass, and circulatory arrest times by making the arch repair procedure simpler and shorter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A meta-analysis and detailed review of the literature published from January 2013 until December 2016, concerning hybrid aortic arch debranching procedures was conducted and data for morbidity and mortality rates were extracted. RESULTS: As far as type I hybrid aortic arch reconstruction is concerned, among the 122 patients included, the pooled endoleak rate was 10.78% (95%CI=1.94-23.40), 30-day or in-hospital mortality was 3.89% (95%CI=0.324-9.78), stroke rate was 3.79% (95%CI=0.25-9.77) and weighted permanent paraplegia rate was 2.4%. In terms of type II hybrid approach, among 40 patients, endoleak rate was 12.5%, 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%, stroke rate was 2.5%, no permanent paraplegia was noticed and late mortality rate was 12.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid aortic arch debranching procedures are a safe alternative to open repair with acceptable short- and mid-term results. They extend the envelope of intervention in aortic arch pathologies, particularly in high-risk patients who are suboptimal candidates for open surgery.

Endarterectomy achieves lower stroke and death rates compared with stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: It is currently unclear if carotid artery stenting (CAS) is as safe as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with significant asymptomatic stenosis. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing CAS with CEA. METHODS: On March 17, 2017, a search for randomized controlled trials was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases with no time limits. We performed meta-analyses with Peto odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. The primary safety and efficacy outcome measures were stroke or death rate at 30 days and ipsilateral stroke at 1 year (including ipsilateral stroke and death rate at 30 days), respectively. Perioperative stroke, ipsilateral stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and cranial nerve injury (CNI) were all secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: The systematic review of the literature identified nine randomized controlled trials reporting on 3709 patients allocated into CEA (n = 1479) or CAS (n = 2230). Stroke or death rate at 30 days was significantly higher for CAS (64/2176 [2.94%]) compared with CEA (27/1431 [1.89%]; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.44; P = .044), with low level of heterogeneity beyond chance (I2 = 0%). Also, stroke rate at 30 days was significantly higher for CAS (63/2176 [2.90%]) than for CEA (26/1431 [1.82%]; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.54; P = .032; I2 = 0%). MI at 30 days was nonsignificantly lower for CAS (12/1815 [0.66%]) compared with CEA (16/1070 [1.50%]; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.24-1.14; P = .105; I2 = 0%); however, CNI at 30 days was significantly lower for CAS (2/1794 [0.11%]) than for CEA (33/1061 [3.21%]; OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.07-0.26; P < .00001; I2 = 0%). Regarding the long-term outcome of stroke or death rate at 30 days plus ipsilateral stroke during follow-up, this was significantly higher for CAS (79/2173 [3.64%]) than for CEA (35/1430 [2.45%]; OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.24; P = .04; I2 = 0%). Quality of evidence for all stroke outcomes was graded moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with asymptomatic stenosis undergoing carotid intervention, there is moderate-quality evidence to suggest that CEA had significantly lower 30-day stroke and also stroke or death rates compared with CAS at the cost of higher CNI and nonsignificantly higher MI rates. The long-term efficacy of CEA in ipsilateral stroke prevention, taking into account perioperative stroke and death, was preserved during follow-up. There is an urgent need for high-quality research before a firm recommendation is made that CAS is inferior or not to CEA.

Tuberculosis of the oral cavity: a systematic review.

The recent increase in the incidence of tuberculosis, combined with an emerging global resistance to antituberculous drugs, warrants an increased awareness of the involvement of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in persistent or atypical lesions in the oral cavity. We sought to review the published reports of mycobacterial infection of the oral cavity found in the literature in otherwise uncompromised patients, from 1950 to the present day, and analyzed the documented manifestations. M. tuberculosis infects all parts of the mouth (soft and hard palate, uvula, buccal mucosa, gingivae, lips, tongue, maxilla, and mandible) more often in men than in women, appearing predominantly in the form of ulcerative lesions. It was found as a secondary infection in 58% (54% pulmonary, 4% extrapulmonary) of patients and as a primary infection in 42% of patients. Carcinomas are found to co-exist in the same lesion site in 3% of patients. In approximately 50% of patients, an oral manifestation of TB has led to the diagnosis of a previously unknown systemic infection, which resulted in a timely and effective treatment. The investigation for tuberculosis should therefore be actively pursued in the dental surgery. Diagnostic work-up for systemic involvement and control of healthcare-associated spread is important, while therapeutic options are still considered adequate.