Characteristics of Gastric Stasis due to Deformation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Lower Part of the Stomach.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric stasis due to deformation occurs after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the lower part of the stomach. Endoscopic balloon dilation can improve gastric stasis due to stenosis; however, endoscopic balloon dilation cannot improve gastric stasis due to deformation. Furthermore, the characteristics of gastric stasis due to deformation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of gastric stasis due to deformation after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the lower part of the stomach, focusing on the differences between stenosis and deformation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients with gastric stasis after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the lower part of the stomach. We evaluated the characteristics of cases with gastric stasis due to deformation, such as the risk factors of deformation and the rate of deformation in each group with risk factors. RESULTS: Deformation was observed in 12% (5/41) of the patients with gastric stasis. All cases of deformation had a circumferential extent of the mucosal defect greater than 3/4. The number of cases with pyloric dissection was significantly lower in the deformation group than in the non-deformation group (0% vs. 72%; p = 0.004). The deformation group also had a significantly higher number of cases with angular dissection than the non-deformation group (100% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). Moreover, the deformation cases had a significantly larger specimen diameter (p < 0.001). Deformation was observed only in cases with angular and non-pyloric dissections. Deformation was not observed in cases with angular and pyloric dissections. CONCLUSIONS: All cases of gastric stasis due to deformation had a circumferential extent of the mucosal defect greater than 3/4. Deformation was also likely to occur in cases with a larger dissection that exceeded the angular region without pyloric dissection.

Timing of pyloric stenosis and effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilation after pyloric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There have been studies on risk factors for stenosis after pyloric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the most appropriate strategies for the management of cases with these risk factors have not been established. This study aimed to investigate post-ESD management by evaluating the timing of stenosis and the effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) after pyloric ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of pyloric ESD. We first reassessed risk factors for stenosis in multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve and defined patients with the identified risk factors as the risk group. The primary outcome was the timing of stenosis in the risk group assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We reviewed 159 cases with pyloric ESD and observed pyloric stenosis in 25 cases. Cases with circumferential mucosal defect ≥ 76% were identified as the risk group. The stenosis-free probability in the risk group was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79-100%), 94% (95% CI: 76-98%), and 85% (95% CI: 66-93%) on days 7, 14, and 21, respectively. It decreased every week thereafter and did not significantly change after day 56. Twenty-three stenosis cases, except for conservative improvement, including six whole circumferential pyloric ESD cases, were improved by EBD without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ESD stenosis often developed from the third to the eighth week. In all pyloric ESD cases, including whole circumferential pyloric ESD cases, pyloric stenosis was improved following EBD without complications.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using EndoTrac, a Novel Traction Device.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recognized as a minimally invasive and curative treatment for superficial gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, ESD is still challenging and time-consuming with a high risk of adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. Various traction methods have been explored for maintaining good visualization of the submucosal layer during ESD. We developed a novel traction device (the EndoTrac) which can easily tie the thread and has the ability to change the towing direction. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and feasibility of ESD using the EndoTrac for GI neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients (45 lesions) with esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and colorectal neoplasms who had undergone ESD using the EndoTrac device between June 2018 and May 2019. Primary outcome measures were preparation time, procedural success using the EndoTrac device, and ease of ability to change towing direction. RESULTS: Mean preparation time was 2 (2-5) min in esophagus, 3 (1-5) min in stomach, 6 (5-9) min in duodenum, and 4 (2-8) min in colorectum. The procedural success rate was 100% (8/8) in esophagus, 100% (21/21) in stomach, 100% (4/4) in duodenum, and 100% (12/12) in colorectum. The rate of successful towing to both proximal and distal sides was 100% (8/8) in esophagus, 100% (21/21) in stomach, 0% (0/4) in duodenum, and 100% (12/12) in colorectum. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the EndoTrac device appears to be a feasible approach to ESD for GI neoplasms.

Early gastric cancer involving a pure enteroblastic differentiation component that was curatively resected via endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) is a very rare variant of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer (AFPGC). GAED is histologically characterized by cuboidal or columnar cells, which resemble those found in the primitive gut and have clear cytoplasm. In previously reported cases, GAED exhibit more aggressive behavior, as well as AFPGC, than conventional gastric cancer, such as marked lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and liver metastasis. And also GAED was usually located in a deep mucosal layer and was covered by a conventional adenocarcinoma (CA) component. Based on these findings, GAED is considered to develop from CA during the process of tumor invasion and proliferation. We present a very rare case of early-stage GAED achieved curatively resected via endoscopic submucosal dissection, in which the lesion was composed of a pure enteroblastic differentiation component without a CA component.