Low-dose pulsed vs standard pulsed fluoroscopy during ERCP to reduce radiation without change in image quality: Prospective randomized study.

Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) poses the risk of radiation exposure (RE) to patients and staff and increases the risk of adverse biological effects such as cataracts, sterility, and cancer. Newer fluoroscopy equipment (C-Arm) provides options to limit radiation in the form of lower radiation dose and frame rate or time-limited "pulsed" settings. However, the impact of lower settings on image quality has not been assessed, and no standard protocol exists for fluoroscopy settings used during ERCP. Patients and methods This was a single-center, double-blind, prospective randomized study of consecutive adult patients undergoing standard-of-care ERCP at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients were randomized into two groups: 1) standard-dose pulsed and 2) low-dose pulsed. Pulsed mode (8 fps) was defined as x-ray exposure either in the manufacturer standard-dose or low-dose settings limited to 3 seconds each time the foot-operated switch was depressed. Results Seventy-eight patients undergoing ERCP were enrolled and randomized. No difference in age, gender, or body mass index was found between the two groups. No significant difference in image quality was found between standard-dose and low-dose fluoroscopy P = 0.925). The low-dose group was exposed to significantly less radiation when compared with standard-dose P < 0.05). Fluoroscopy time (minutes) was similar in both groups (2.0 vs 1.9), further suggesting that group assignment had no impact on image quality or procedure time. Conclusions Low-dose pulsed fluoroscopy is a reliable method that substantially reduces radiation without compromising image quality or affecting procedure or fluoroscopy times. This underscores the need for standardization in ERCP fluoroscopy settings to limit radiation exposure.

Two Novel Clinical Tests for the Diagnosis of Hip Labral Tears.

BACKGROUND: There are few well-studied clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip labral tears. As the differential diagnosis for hip pain is broad, accurate clinical examination is important in guiding advanced imaging and identifying patients who may benefit from surgical management. PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip labral tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Clinical examination findings including the Arlington, twist, and flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR)/impingement tests as performed by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon specializing in hip arthroscopy were obtained from retrospective chart review. The Arlington test ranges the hip from flexion-abduction-external rotation to FADIR while applying subtle internal rotation and external rotation motion. The twist test involves internal rotation and external rotation of the hip while weightbearing. Diagnostic accuracy statistics for each of the tests were calculated using magnetic resonance arthrography as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 40.7 years (range, 13-77 years) and 66.4% were women. The Arlington test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), specificity of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.13-0.46). The twist test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), specificity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.49-0.88), PPV of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and NPV of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.08-0.21). The FADIR/impingement test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.37-0.49), specificity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.34-0.75), PPV of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97), and NPV of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11). The Arlington test was significantly more sensitive than both the twist and FADIR/impingement tests (P < .05), while the twist test was significantly more specific than the Arlington test (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The Arlington test is more sensitive than the traditional FADIR/impingement test, while the twist test is more specific than the FADIR/impingement test in diagnosing hip labral tears in the hands of an experienced orthopaedic surgeon.

A Novel Approach to Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular and Midfacial Reconstruction With a Fibula Free Flap.

BACKGROUND: The fibula free flap is a major workhorse in facial reconstruction. To decrease operative times, virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been implemented. Traditional VSP is costly and may delay operative planning. in this study, the authors present a novel algorithm using readily accessible software packages to perform VSP in a manner that is quick and cost-effective. METHODS: A 6-part survey was administered to physicians with prior training in facial reconstruction. Fourteen physicians participated regarding outcomes on 10 patients who underwent mandibular or midfacial fibula free flap reconstruction. Participants were asked to match the true postoperative and VSP models and rate the similarity of the models using the Likert scale (0-10). The goal was to determine whether the VSP models accurately depicted the actual reconstruction, and whether they would use VSP in future clinical practice. RESULTS: The physicians surveyed were able to match the models correctly 93.6% of the time. The mean score for the similarity between virtual and actual models ranged between 7.60 and 8.80. Most participants (90.9%) who answered stated they would use our VSP algorithm if they were trained in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Virtual surgical planning models were created utilizing our novel algorithm. Participants matched the preoperative VSP plan with the postoperative model most of the time and rated the similarity well. Participants in our study are interested in learning more about physician performed VSP. The authors believe this model may be financially and clinically relevant and serve as an excellent educational tool.