Patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas: the COLONAV cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a Patient Navigation Intervention targeting deprived patients for Colo-Rectal Cancer (CRC) screening participation. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in 5 districts. Peer Lay Patient Navigators were recruited to operate in deprived areas. Eligible participants had to be between 50 and 74 years old, live in these deprived areas and receive an invitation to the nationally organized Colo-Rectal Cancer (CRC) screening during the study period. The theory-driven navigation intervention was deployed for 18 months. A population Health Intervention Research assessment method was used to assess effectiveness and context interaction. The primary criterion was screening participation at 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four thousand two hundred eighty-one individuals were included inside 40 clusters. The increase in participation in the intervention group was estimated at 23%, (ORa = 1.23, CI95% [1.07-1.41], p = 0.003). For the subgroup of individuals who participated, the time delay to participating was reduced by 26% (ORa = 0.74, CI95% [0.57-0.96], p = 0.021). Main factors modulating the effect of the intervention were: closeness of navigator profiles to the targeted population, navigators' abilities to adapt their modus operandi, and facilitating attachment structure. CONCLUSION: The ColoNav Intervention succeeded in demonstrating its effectiveness, for CRC screening. Patient Navigation should be disseminate with broader health promotion goals in order to achieve equity in health care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02369757 24/02/2015.

Implementation of a self-administered questionnaire to detect lung carcinogens.

BACKGROUND: Between 10 and 20% of lung cancers are of occupational origin. Screening for occupational risk factors is part of the diagnostic workup. A self-administered questionnaire to detect lung carcinogens of occupational origin, the RECAP questionnaire, was drawn up and validated with a view to limiting under-declaration of lung cancer as an occupational disease (OD). AIMS: Optimal administration conditions were investigated, to facilitate systematic use in the management of patients admitted to hospital with lung cancer. METHODS: The various care pathways of lung cancer patients were first studied in two centres, to identify the health-care professionals involved in medical management, the various care sites and the stages of treatment. A focus group of health-care professionals was set up, and semi-directive interviews were conducted with 24 patients. RESULTS: Caregivers tended to suggest that a physician or nurse should present the RECAP questionnaire, whereas patients rather chose non-caregiver staff, seeing the undertaking as being 'administrative' in nature. Some caregivers and patients thought the questionnaire should not be administered at the outset of treatment, due to the psychological trauma entailed by diagnosis. Administration during chemotherapy was recommended by patients, as they are more freely available at that time, and by caregivers, who thought patients better able to pay attention then. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted patients' lack of information on how lung cancer can be recognized as an OD. Implementing the RECAP questionnaire should facilitate patients' claims for insurance cover for lung cancer as an OD.

Design and validation of a self-administered questionnaire as an aid to detection of occupational exposure to lung carcinogens.

OBJECTIVE: Ten to thirty percent of lung cancer is thought to be of occupational origin. Lung cancer is under-declared as an occupational disease in Europe, and most declarations of occupational disease concern asbestos. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a short, sensitive self-administered questionnaire, as an aid for physicians in detecting occupational exposure to asbestos and other lung carcinogens in order to remedy occupational lung cancer under-declaration. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A short (30-question) self-administered questionnaire was drawn up by oncologist-pneumologists and occupational physicians, covering situations of exposure to proven and probable lung carcinogens. Understanding and acceptability were assessed on 15 lung cancer patients. Validity and reliability were assessed on 70 lung cancer patients by comparison against a semi-directive questionnaire considered as gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed by comparing responses to items on the two questionnaires. Reliability was assessed by analysing the kappa concordance coefficient for items on the two questionnaires. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 0.85 and specificity 0.875. Concordance between responses on the two questionnaires was 85.7%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.695 [0.52-0.87]. Mean self-administration time was 3.1 min (versus 8.12 min to administer the gold-standard questionnaire). In 16 patients, the self-administered questionnaire detected lung carcinogen exposure meeting the criteria for occupational disease. CONCLUSION: The present short, easy-to-use self-administered questionnaire should facilitate detection of occupational exposure to lung carcinogens. It could be used in occupational lung cancer screening and increase the presently low rate of application for recognition of lung cancer as an occupational disease.

ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas - Study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The mass colorectal cancer screening program was implemented in 2008 in France, targeting 16 million French people aged between 50 and 74. The current adhesion is insufficient and the participation rate is even lower among the underserved population, increasing health inequalities within our health care system. Patient Navigation programs have proved their efficiency to promote the access to cancer screening and diagnosis. METHODS/DESIGN: The purpose of the study is to assess the implementation of a patient navigation intervention that has been described in another cultural environment and another health care system. The main objective of the program is to increase the colorectal cancer screening participation rate among the deprived population through the intervention of a navigator to promote the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) and complementary exams. We performed a multisite cluster randomized controlled trial, with three groups (one experimental group and two control groups) for 18 months. DISCUSSION: The study attempts to give a better understanding of the adhesion barriers to colorectal cancer screening among underserved populations. If this project is cost-effective, it could create a dynamic based on peer approaches that could be developed for other cancer screening programs and other chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02369757.

HPV vaccination among French girls and women aged 14-23 years and the relationship with their mothers' uptake of Pap smear screening: a study in general practice.

INTRODUCTION: HPV vaccination is recommended in France for girls aged 14 and for those aged 15-23 before sexual debut or who have become sexually active within the previous year. The first aim was to describe vaccination practice among 14-23-year-old girls visiting a general practitioner. A second objective was to investigate factors associated with starting vaccination among girls aged 14-18, in particular the regular practice of Pap-smear screening (PSS) by their mothers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2009. A total of 87 general practitioners from the large Rhône-Alpes region contributed data on 502 girls/women who came for consultation. RESULTS: 231 (46.0%) of these girls/women had begun the process of HPV vaccination (68.2%, 56.9% and 18.7% of the 14-16, 17-20 and 21-23-year-olds respectively) of whom 139 (60.2%) had received all three doses. 92 girls/women (39.8%) had received only one or two doses at the time of study. However, in 71 (77.2%) cases, the gap between the last dose received and the time of study was within the between-dose interval recommended in the vaccination schedule. GPs reported that 16 (11.5%) had mentioned side effects following injections. Having a mother who practised regular PSS (Odds Ratio 6.2 [1.5-25.8]), having never lived with a partner (4.6 [1.6-13.5]) and vaccination against hepatitis B (3.2 [1.6-6.1]) were found to be independently correlated with the initiation of HPV vaccination among girls/women aged 14-18 years. CONCLUSION: Two years after the start of the programme, only half of girls/women aged 14-23 years had begun the process of HPV vaccination. HPV vaccination status was correlated with PSS in the mother, family status and hepatitis B vaccination. Such information may help to better target girls who are less likely to be vaccinated.

[Gynaecologists' attitudes and practices towards HPV vaccination: a quantitative-qualitative study in Rhône-Alpes]. / Perception et pratique de la vaccination HPV par les gynécologues : une étude quantitative et qualitative en Rhône-Alpes.

OBJECTIVES: Acceptance of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine by targeted population will mainly depend on its acceptability among gynaecologists. We examined the perceptions, attitudes and practices of gynaecologists in relation to HPV vaccination 1 year after licensing. POPULATION AND METHODS: From November 2007 to April 2008, a cross-sectional survey was carried among a representative 10% sample of gynaecologists in the French Rhône-Alpes region. Both quantitative (self-administered questionnaire) and qualitative (interview) approaches were used. RESULTS: Among the 52 respondents, 90.4% of gynaecologists reported a favourable opinion about HPV vaccination, 5.8% were uncertain and 1.9% was opposed (one did not answer). The main justification for a favourable opinion related to the public health effects of the HPV vaccination (cited by 31.9% of those favouring vaccination). The main justification for an uncertain or opposed opinion was the too recent introduction of the vaccine (cited by 100%). During the month preceding the survey, 40.4% had provided HPV vaccination, mainly in 15-23 years old girls (38.5%). The major difficulties in providing HPV vaccination were questions asked by patients (cited by 44.2% of the respondents) and the targeted age of 14 years (13.5%). A total of 87.5% of respondents reported to have discussed with 14-year-old vaccinated girls of Pap-smear and 12.5% of STI prevention. CONCLUSION: One year after HPV vaccine licensing, gynaecologists of Rhône-Alpes region had a favourable opinion about it, despite some difficulties. Little information about STI prevention to vaccinated girls was reported opposite to information about Pap-smear.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: perception and practice among French general practitioners in the year since licensing.

Acceptance of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine by targeted populations will depend to a large extent on its acceptability among physicians. We examined the perceptions, attitudes and practices of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to HPV vaccination. From November 2007 to April 2008, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among a representative 5% sample of GPs in the large Rhône-Alpes region of France. Both quantitative (self-administered questionnaire) and qualitative (interview) approaches were used. During the month preceding the survey, 75.6% of the 279 GPs who responded had given at least one HPV vaccination and 47.6% had given a vaccination at the routine target age of 14 years. Overall, 80.8% of GPs reported a favourable opinion about HPV vaccination, 17.4% were uncertain and 1.8% were opposed. The main justification for a favourable opinion related to the public health benefits of the HPV vaccination (cited by 60% of those favouring vaccination). The main justification for an "opposed or uncertain" opinion was the too recent introduction of the vaccine (cited by 43.4%). The major difficulties in providing HPV vaccination were patients' concerns about potential side effects (cited by 37% of the respondents) and the target age of 14 years (28.9%). Interviews suggested that the concern about age may relate to the need, as perceived by GPs, to discuss sexually transmitted infections with adolescent patients. A favourable opinion about HPV vaccination was associated with seeing more female patients per week, younger age, and GPs' intention to recommend hepatitis B vaccination. This representative survey of GPs in a major region of France finds a favourable opinion about the HPV vaccine and widespread use of it, despite some concerns that the recent introduction of the vaccine means that we do not yet fully understand the potential for side effects and about the recommended target age of recipients.