Splenectomy allows remission of angioedema with acquired C1-INH deficiency associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

Splenectomy may be considered as an alternative to rituximab in selected cases of acquired angioedema associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab-Based Treatments in Angioedema With Acquired C1-Inhibitor Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Angioedema (AE) due to acquired C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) is related to excessive consumption of C1-INH or to anti-C1-INH antibodies, and is frequently associated with lymphoproliferative syndromes or monoclonal gammopathies. Standard of care for prophylactic treatment in this condition is not established. Rituximab may be effective to prevent attacks, especially if the lymphoid hemopathy is controlled, but data are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy of rituximab in AAE-C1-INH. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was carried out in France, including patients with AAE-C1-INH treated with rituximab between April 2005 and July 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with AAE-C1-INH were included in the study, and 23 of them had an anti-C1-INH antibody. A lymphoid malignancy was identified in 39 patients, and a monoclonal gammopathy in 9. There was no associated condition in 7 cases. Thirty patients received rituximab alone or in association with chemotherapy (n = 25). Among 51 patients with available follow-up, 34 patients were in clinical remission and 17 patients had active AE after a median follow-up of 3.9 years (interquartile range, 1.5-7.7). Three patients died. The presence of anti-C1-INH antibodies was associated with a lower probability of AE remission (hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.12-0.67]; P = .004). Relapse was less frequent in patients with lymphoma (risk ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.09-0.80]; P = .019) and in patients treated with rituximab and chemotherapy (risk ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.12-0.79]; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is an efficient and well-tolerated therapeutic option in AE, especially in lymphoid malignancies and in the absence of detectable anti-C1-INH antibodies.

Drug-induced meningitis: A review of the literature and comparison with an historical cohort of viral meningitis cases.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced aseptic meningitis (DIAM) is potentially insufficiently considered by clinician, being of rare etiology, with there being no previously published exhaustive study describing its clinical and biological features. METHODS: Two independent academic clinicians searched all the case reports of DIAM from 1995 until 15th April, 2017. The search was limited to studies performed in humans, published in English or French. Clinical and biological data of subjects were compared with those of patients with documented viral meningitis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one case reports fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the commonest drug cause of AM n=49, followed by antibiotics n=46, biotherapy n=19 and finally immunomodulators n=15. The clinical and biological presentation of DIAM varies according to the causative etiological drug, especially with respect to the interval between exposure and presentation and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleiocytosis. Clinical symptoms associated with meningitis were more prevalent in viral meningitis than in DIAM, except for fever and signs of encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid examination in DIAM reveals an increased CSF white cell count and an increased proportion of neutrophils and protein, compared with viral meningitis. DISCUSSION: We present an extensive review of the DIAM case reports, and highlight their clinical and biological characteristics according to the drugs involved. While comparing for the first time their characteristics with those of viral meningitis, this review hopes in facilitate earlier diagnosis and management of DIAM in clinical practice.

Visceral leishmaniasis in patients with lymphoma: Case reports and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Non-HIV-related visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is becoming increasingly prevalent in nontropical countries because of the increasing number of patients with chronic diseases and the development of immune-modulating drugs. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1 is a 60-year-old male patient of Senegalese origin presented with weight loss, lymphadenopathy, anemia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenases. Case 2 is a 46-year-old male patient of Algerian origin, with a negative HIV serology presented with cutaneous lesions. DIAGNOSIS: Patient 1: The diagnosis of stage IV lymphocytic lymphoma (LL) was confirmed by an inguinal nodal biopsy in 2013. Patient 2: The diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma was made in 2003. INTERVENTIONS: Patient 1 received 5 cycles of bendamustine and rituximab followed by a complete remission. Patient 2 was initially treated with >10 different treatments followed by 8 different chemotherapy regimens due to the disease progression. OUTCOMES: Patient 1: In 2017, after a follow-up of 4 years, the patient presented with fever, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and pancytopenia in the setting of hemophagocytic syndrome. The initial diagnosis was a relapse of lymphoma and the patient was treated with ibrutinib. His status worsened, and Leishmania DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on the blood and bone marrow aspirates. Ibrutinib was stopped. Amphotericin B treatment induced a complete clinical remission and clearance of Leishmania DNA from the blood.Patient 2: In 2017, after a follow-up of 14 years, the patient presented with fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, pancytopenia with hemophagocytic syndrome, and an increase in the tumor skin lesions. A skin biopsy was taken from the face and the patient. A careful reexamination of the skin biopsy revealed the presence of Leishmania bodies. He was treated with 40 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B leading to a regression of the clinical symptoms and negativation of the blood PCR. CONCLUSIONS: This case study shows that VL may be a diagnostic challenge in patients with lymphoma. Reactivation or primary infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to remind clinicians to think of VL in patients with systemic symptoms that could be misdiagnosed as a progression of the underlying lymphoma.