RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Genetically elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) and familial hypercholesterolemia each result in premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); however, a direct comparison in the same population is needed of these 2 genetic traits on the risk of ASCVD. OBJECTIVES: We determined the level of plasma lipoprotein(a) that is equivalent to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in clinically and genetically diagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia on risk of myocardial infarction and ASCVD. METHODS: We examined the CGPS (Copenhagen General Population Study) with determination of lipoprotein(a) and familial hypercholesterolemia in 69,644 individuals followed for 42 years, during which time, 4,166 developed myocardial infarction and 11,464, ASCVD. RESULTS: For risk of myocardial infarction, the plasma lipoprotein(a) level equivalent to LDL cholesterol in clinical familial hypercholesterolemia was 67 mg/dL (142 nmol/L) for MEDPED (Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Death), 110 mg/dL (236 nmol/L) for Simon Broome, 256 mg/dL (554 nmol/L) for possible DLCN (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network), and 402 mg/dL (873 nmol/L) for probable+definite DLCN, whereas it was 180 mg/dL (389 nmol/L) for genetic familial hypercholesterolemia. Corresponding values for ASCVD were 130 mg/dL (280 nmol/L), 150 mg/dL (323 nmol/L), 227 mg/dL (491 nmol/L), 391 mg/dL (849 nmol/L), and 175 mg/dL (378 nmol/L), respectively. Individuals with both elevated lipoprotein(a) and either familial hypercholesterolemia or a family history of premature myocardial infarction had a higher risk of myocardial infarction and ASCVD compared with individuals with only 1 of these genetic traits, with the highest HRs being for lipoprotein(a) upper 20% vs lower 50% of 14.0 (95% CI: 9.15-21.3) for myocardial infarction and 5.05 (95% CI: 3.41-7.48) for ASCVD. CONCLUSIONS: Lipoprotein(a) levels equivalent to LDL cholesterol in clinical and genetic familial hypercholesterolemia were 67 to 402 mg/dL and 180 mg/dL, respectively, for myocardial infarction and 130 to 391 mg/dL and 175 mg/dL, respectively, for ASCVD.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , LDL-Colesterol , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/complicações , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiologia , Lipoproteína(a) , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: High levels of lipoprotein(a) could worsen the outcome of COVID-19 due to prothrombotic and proinflammatory properties of lipoprotein(a). We tested the hypotheses that during COVID-19 hospitalization i) increased thrombotic activity and inflammation are associated with lipoprotein(a) levels, and ii) lipoprotein(a) levels are associated with rate of hospital death and discharge. METHODS: We studied 211 patients admitted to Copenhagen University Hospital in 2020 with COVID-19, that is, prior to any vaccination. Thrombotic activity was marked by elevated D-dimer while inflammation was marked by elevated interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin. Patients were followed until death (N = 36) or discharge (N = 175). RESULTS: A 2-fold higher D-dimer was associated with 14% (95%CI: 8.1-20%) higher lipoprotein(a). Conversely, 2-fold higher interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were associated with respectively 4.3% (0.62-7.8%), 5.7% (0.15-5.2%), and 8.7% (5.2-12%) lower lipoprotein(a). For hospital death, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio per 2-fold higher lipoprotein(a) was 1.26 (95%CI:0.91-1.73). Corresponding hazard ratios per 2-fold higher biomarker were 0.93 (0.75-1.16) for D-dimer, 1.42 (1.17-1.73) for interleukin-6, 1.44 (0.95-2.17) for C-reactive protein, and 1.44 (1.20-1.73) for procalcitonin. For hospital discharge, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio per 2-fold higher lipoprotein(a) was 0.91 (95%CI:0.79-1.06). Corresponding hazard ratios per 2-fold higher biomarker were 0.86 (0.75-0.98) for D-dimer, 0.84 (0.76-0.92) for interleukin-6, 0.80 (0.71-0.90) for C-reactive protein, and 0.76 (0.67-0.88) for procalcitonin. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 patients, thrombotic activity marked by elevated D-dimer was associated with higher lipoprotein(a) while elevated inflammatory biomarkers of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were associated with lower lipoprotein(a); however, elevated lipoprotein(a) was not associated with rate of hospital death or discharge.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombose , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Hospitalização , Humanos , Inflamação , Interleucina-6 , Lipoproteína(a) , Pró-Calcitonina , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: High plasma lipoprotein(a) and high body mass index are both causal risk factors for calcific aortic valve disease. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to test the hypothesis that risk of calcific aortic valve disease is the highest when both plasma lipoprotein(a) and body mass index are extremely high. METHODS: From the Copenhagen General Population Study, we used information on 69,988 randomly selected individuals recruited from 2003 to 2015 (median follow-up 7.4 years) to evaluate the association between high lipoprotein(a) and high body mass index with risk of calcific aortic valve disease. RESULTS: Compared with individuals in the 1st to 49th percentiles for both lipoprotein(a) and body mass index, the multivariable adjusted HRs for calcific aortic valve disease were 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3-1.9) for the 50th to 89th percentiles of both (16% of all individuals) and 3.5 (95% CI: 2.5-5.1) for the 90th to 100th percentiles of both (1.1%) (P for interaction = 0.92). The 10-year absolute risk of calcific aortic valve disease increased with higher lipoprotein(a), body mass index, and age, and was higher in men than in women. For women and men 70-79 years of age with body mass index ≥30.0 kg/m2, 10-year absolute risks were 5% and 8% for lipoprotein(a) ≤42 mg/dL (88 nmol/L), 7% and 11% for 42-79 mg/dL (89-169 nmol/L), and 9% and 14% for lipoprotein(a) ≥80 mg/dL (170 nmol/L), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Extremely high lipoprotein(a) levels and extremely high body mass index together conferred a 3.5-fold risk of calcific aortic valve disease. Ten-year absolute risk of calcific aortic valve disease by categories of lipoprotein(a) levels, body mass index, age, and sex ranged from 0.4% to 14%.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/sangue , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Calcinose/sangue , Previsões , Lipoproteína(a)/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Calcinose/diagnóstico , Calcinose/epidemiologia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We tested the hypotheses (i) that elevated lipoprotein(a) is causally associated with both mitral and aortic valve calcification and disease, and (ii) that aortic valve calcification mediates the effect of elevated lipoprotein(a) on aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: From the Copenhagen General Population study, we included 12,006 individuals who underwent cardiac computed tomography to measure mitral and aortic valve calcification and 85,884 to examine risk of heart valve disease. Participants had information on plasma lipoprotein(a) and genetic instruments associated with plasma lipoprotein(a) to investigate potential causality. RESULTS: At age 70-79 years, 29% and 54% had mitral and aortic valve calcification, respectively. For 10-fold higher lipoprotein(a) levels, multifactorially adjusted odds ratios for mitral and aortic valve calcification were 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.41) and 1.62 (1.48-1.77). For mitral and aortic valve stenosis, corresponding hazard ratios were 0.93 (95%CI:0.40-2.15, 19 events) and 1.54 (1.38-1.71, 1158 events), respectively. For ≤23 versus ≥36 kringle IV type 2 number of repeats, the age and sex adjusted odds ratios for mitral and aortic valve calcification were 1.53 (1.18-1.99) and 2.23 (1.81-2.76). For carriers versus non-carriers of LPA rs10455872, odds ratios for mitral and aortic valve calcification were 1.33 (1.13-1.57) and 1.86 (1.64-2.13). For aortic valve stenosis, 31% (95%CI:16%-76%) of the effect of lipoprotein(a) was mediated through calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated lipoprotein(a) was genetically and observationally associated with mitral and aortic valve calcification and aortic valve stenosis. Aortic valve calcification mediated 31% of the effect of elevated lipoprotein(a) on aortic valve stenosis.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Valva Aórtica , Idoso , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/genética , Calcinose , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a) , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIMS: We tested the hypothesis that higher levels of plasma triglycerides and remnant cholesterol are observationally and genetically associated with increased risk of aortic valve stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 108 559 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study. Plasma triglycerides, remnant cholesterol (total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and 16 genetic variants causing such increased or decreased levels were determined. Incident aortic valve stenosis occurred in 1593 individuals. Observationally compared to individuals with triglycerides <1 mmol/L (<89 mg/dL), the multifactorially adjusted hazard ratio for aortic valve stenosis was 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.19] for individuals with triglycerides of 1.0-1.9 mmol/L (89-176 mg/dL), 1.22 (1.02-1.46) for 2.0-2.9 mmol/L (177-265 mg/dL), 1.40 (1.11-1.77) for 3.0-3.9 mmol/L (266-353 mg/dL), 1.29 (0.88-1.90) for 4.0-4.9 mmol/L (354-442 mg/dL), and 1.52 (1.02-2.27) for individuals with triglycerides ≥5 mmol/L (≥443 mg/dL). By age 85, the cumulative incidence of aortic valve stenosis was 5.1% for individuals with plasma triglycerides <2.0 mmol/L (77 mg/dL), 6.5% at 2.0-4.9 mmol/L (177-442 mg/dL), and 8.2% for individuals with plasma triglycerides ≥5.0 mmol/L (443 mg/dL). The corresponding values for remnant cholesterol categories were 4.8% for <0.5 mmol/L (19 mg/dL), 5.6% for 0.5-1.4 mmol/L (19-57 mg/dL), and 7.4% for ≥1.5 mmol/L (58 mg/dL). Genetically, compared to individuals with allele score 13-16, odds ratios for aortic valve stenosis were 1.30 (95% CI 1.20-1.42; Δtriglycerides +12%; Δremnant cholesterol +11%) for allele score 17-18, 1.41 (1.31-1.52; +25%; +22%) for allele score 19-20, and 1.51 (1.22-1.86; +51%; +44%) for individuals with allele score 21-23. CONCLUSION: Higher triglycerides and remnant cholesterol were observationally and genetically associated with increased risk of aortic valve stenosis.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/genética , Colesterol , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , TriglicerídeosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Causal risk factors for aortic valve stenosis are poorly understood, limiting the possibility of preventing the most common heart valve disease. OBJECTIVES: The hypothesis was tested that genetically based obesity measured by body mass index is causally associated with risk of aortic valve stenosis and replacement. METHODS: The authors included 108,211 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study. Participants had measurements of body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and waist circumference, and information on 5 genetic variants associated with obesity. A Mendelian randomization design was used to investigate genetic and observational associations of obesity with incident aortic valve stenosis (n = 1,215) and replacement (n = 467) for a median follow-up time of 8.7 years. RESULTS: Genetically increased body mass index was causally associated with increased risk of aortic valve stenosis. Compared with an unweighted allele score of 0 to 3, individuals with an allele score 7 to 10 had a mean increase in body mass index of 0.87 kg/m2, and the age and sex-adjusted hazard ratio for aortic valve stenosis was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0 to 1.7) for allele score 4, 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1 to 1.8) for allele score 5 to 6, and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.1) for allele score 7 to 10 (p for trend: 9 × 10-5). A 1-kg/m2 increase in body mass index was associated with causal risk ratios for aortic valve stenosis and replacement, respectively, of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.87) and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.07 to 2.08) genetically, and with corresponding hazard ratios of 1.06 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.08) and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.08) observationally. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity from human genetics was causally associated with higher risk of aortic valve stenosis and replacement.