Regional analgesia using ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block versus cervical erector spinae block for anterior cervical spine surgery: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia techniques are crucial for pain management after cervical spine surgeries. Anesthesiologists strive to select the most effective and least hazardous regional analgesia technique for the cervical region. Our hypothesis is that an intermediate cervical plexus (IC) block can provide adequate postoperative analgesia compared to a cervical erector spinae (ES) block in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind prospective trial, 58 patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups prior to the administration of general anesthesia. Patients in the IC group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral intermediate cervical plexus block with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% administered to each side. The ES group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral cervical erector spinae plane blocks with 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine administered to each side at the C6 level. The primary outcome was to record the time to the first call for rescue analgesia (nalbuphine), and the secondary outcomes were to measure the performance time, the onset of the sensory block, the intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain intensity using VAS, the postoperative total nalbuphine consumption, and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia. RESULTS: The performance and onset of sensory block times were significantly shorter in the IC group compared to the ES group. The time to first call for nalbuphine was significantly shorter in the IC group (7.31 ± 1.34 h) compared to the ES group (11.10 ± 1.82 h). The mean postoperative VAS scores were comparable between the two groups at the measured time points, except at 8 h, where it was significantly higher in the IC group, and at 12 h, where it was significantly higher in the ES group. The total nalbuphine consumption was significantly higher in the IC group (33.1 ± 10.13 mg) compared to the ES group (22.76 ± 8.62 mg). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery, the intermediate cervical plexus block does not provide better postoperative regional analgesia compared to the cervical erector spinae block. Performance time and onset time were shorter in the IC group, whereas nalbuphine consumption was lower in the ES group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (NCT05577559, and the date of registration: 13-10-2022).

The Analgesic Effects of Preemptive Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Comparison with Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Perioperative pain management strategies in the elderly undergoing hip arthroplasty need special and safe preemptive care. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of preemptive ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in the elderly undergoing hip arthroplasty. The time to the first postoperative rescue analgesia was measured. The secondary aim was to assess the ease of spinal positioning (EOSP), onset of sensory block, block performance time, and patient satisfaction. Methods: Before positioning for spinal anesthesia, 69 elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty were randomized into three groups (n = 23 per group). The first intervention group received ultrasound-guided PENG block with 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25%; the second intervention group received ultrasound-guided L-ESPB using the same dose of bupivacaine. In the control group, patients received spinal anesthesia without any block. Results: The time to first postoperative rescue analgesic (morphine) was significantly prolonged in the PENG group (13.3 ± 3.5 h) compared to the L-ESPB (9.5 ± 2.3 h) and control (2.6 ± 0.4 h) groups. The EOSP score was significantly higher in the PENG group compared to the L-ESPB and control groups (P < 0.001). The block performance time and oneset of the sensory block were significantly shorter in the PENG group compared to the L-ESPB group. The highest patient satisfaction scores were observed in the PENG group. Conclusions: Preemptive pericapsular nerve group block postponed the need for postoperative analgesia and eased spinal positioning compared to L-ESPB in the elderly undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Ultrasound-guided Retrolaminar Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists are always looking for a regional analgesic technique which is easy, safe, has a low complication rate, and provides satisfactory analgesia. A retrolaminar block is a recent modified paravertebral technique for analgesia in  thoracoabdominal procedures with a local anesthetic injected at the retrolaminar site. It has the advantage of being safe and easy compared with traditional thoracic epidural analgesia but is still under investigation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare ultrasound-guided bilateral retrolaminar block with ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized double-blinded clinical study. SETTING: Academic University Hospitals. METHODS: Fifty-two adult patients were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups at the end of the surgery: Group R (n = 26) received a bilateral ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 5 µg/mL adrenaline (1:200000) in each side. Group T (n = 26) received ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 5 µg/mL adrenaline (1:200000). RESULTS: The Numeric Rating Scale  scores both at rest and during cough were statistically significantly lower in Group R compared with Group T at 30 minutes and one hour postoperatively. The pain scores were statistically significantly lower for about 4 hours in Group R group compared with 6 hours in Group T. The time for the first call of nalbuphine was highly statistically significantly shorter in Group R group (233.04 ± 5.27 minutes) compared with Group T (353.77 ± 5.16 minutes) (mean difference -120.37, (95% CI,  -123.6 to -117.8) P < 0.001. The total amount of nalbuphine consumption in the first 12 hours was statistically significantly decreased in Group T (17.31 ± 5.52 mg) compared with Group R (27.69 ± 5.52 mg) (Mean difference 10.4, 95% CI  7.3-13.5), P < 0.001. The total number of patients who developed nausea and vomiting were statistically significantly greater in Group T (9 patients) compared with Group R group (3 patients), P = 0.04. Moreover, hypotension was statistically significantly more common among patients in Group T group (10 patients) compared with Group R (3 patients), P = 0.025. Both groups were comparable regarding patient satisfaction. LIMITATIONS: There is limited literature in the field of the present study and sensory dermatome assessment, but this does not affect the results as we used an ultrasound-guided technique. CONCLUSIONS: A single injection retrolaminar block provides adequate postoperative pain relief for about 4 hours compared with a single shot thoracic epidural that lasts about 6 hours. Patient satisfaction with both techniques was the same; about two-thirds of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with either block.

Effect of perioperative magnesium sulfate and labetalol infusion on peripheral perfusion and postoperative pain in nasal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of adequate peripheral perfusion during controlled hypotension is necessary for patient safety and improved surgical outcomes during controlled hypotension in nasal surgery. The hypothesis of this study was to investigate the effect of perioperative magnesium sulfate and labetalol infusion on peripheral perfusion and postoperative pain in patients undergoing nasal surgery. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups in this double-blind clinical study: the magnesium sulfate group; received 40 mg/kg loading dose of intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate followed by 10-15 mg/kg/h continuous IV infusion and the labetalol group; received 0.25 mg/kg loading dose of IV labetalol followed by 0.5-1 mg/kg/h continuous IV infusion to achieve a mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) of = 55-65 mmHg. The primary outcome was to compare the effect of perioperative magnesium sulfate and labetalol infusion on peripheral perfusion during nasal surgery. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of serum lactate, postoperative pain, time to the first call for pethidine (rescue analgesic) and total pethidine consumption. RESULTS: PPI was comparable between the groups at baseline, intubation, and 5 min. In contrast, magnesium sulfate group had a significantly higher PPI than the labetalol group. The magnesium sulfate group had a significantly higher MABP and heart rate compared to labetalol group. The time to reach the target MABP was significantly prolonged in magnesium sulfate than the labetalol group [21.6 ± 1.7 vs 6.9 ± 1.5] min. VAS scores were significantly lower for 2 hs postoperatively in the magnesium sulfate group than the labetalol group. The time to first call of pethidine was significantly prolonged in the magnesium sulfate group compared to the labetalol group [113.1 ± 5.2 vs 28.2 ± 1.5] min. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium sulfate maintains wider PPI and offers better postoperative pain relief compared to labetalol during induced hypotension in nasal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional review board approval (ref: 6601/20-12-2020). CLINICALTRIAL: gov (ref: NCT04688203 , date of registration: 29 -12-2020).

Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Intraarticular Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Knee Arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Intraarticular bupivacaine produces sufficient analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery, but its analgesic duration is short. There is a need to search for an adjuvant with a longer duration of analgesia. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the duration of analgesia, total rescue analgesic consumptions, pain intensity, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to intraarticular bupivacaine for analgesia after knee arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled study. SETTING: Zagazig University Hospitals. METHODS: After ending arthroscopy and 15 minutes before deflation of the tourniquet, 45 patients were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups: Group B (n = 15) received an intraarticular injection of 50 mg (20 mL) bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 mL saline; group BD (n = 15): received an intraarticular injection of 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25% plus 100 µg (1 mL) dexmedetomidine; and group BF (n = 15) received an intraarticular injection of 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25% plus 50 µg (1 mL) fentanyl. RESULTS: The BF group had a statistically significant longest duration of analgesia (693.3 ± 22.6 minutes) compared to group the BD (505.8 ± 23.5 minutes) and group B (244.1 ± 17.5 minutes) (P < 0.0001). The total meperidine consumption was statistically significantly decreased in group BF (35 ± 12.6 mg) compared to the BD and B groups (60 ± 12.6 mg and 83.3 ± 15.4 mg respectively) (P < 0.0001). Groups BF and BD showed a highly statistically significant lower postoperative static and dynamic pain scores at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours compared to group B. However, group BF was comparable to group BD at the same time intervals. Postoperative static and dynamic pain scores showed a highly statistically significant higher values at 4 hours in group B, 8 hours in group BD, and 12 hours in group BF (P < 0.0001). No significant side effects were observed in the groups. The duration of analgesia was the most important parameter that determined patient satisfaction. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and lack of studies that compare both adjuvants. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty µg of fentanyl as an adjuvant to intraarticular bupivacaine produces effective and safe analgesia after knee arthroscopy as 100 µg of dexmedetomidine and has a longer analgesia duration in the first postoperative 24 hours.

Ultrasound prediction for vocal cord dysfunction in patients scheduled for anterior cervical spine surgeries: a prospective cohort study.

Prediction of vocal cord dysfunction is essential after anterior cervical spine surgeries. This study aimed to detect the validity of transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography by both anterior and novel lateral approaches for prediction of vocal cord edema and paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgeries. A prospective cohort study conducted on 90 patients scheduled for anterior cervical spine surgeries underwent consecutive pre and postoperative vocal cord examination for edema and paralysis by both anterior and lateral approaches laryngeal ultrasonography. Rigid laryngoscopy was the standard confirmatory tool. For postoperative vocal cord edema, the anterior ultrasonography approach diagnostic sensitivity = 88.2%, specificity = 78.9% with PPV = 78.9% and NPV = 88.2% and the novel lateral ultrasonography approach diagnostic sensitivity = 88.2%, specificity = 94.7% with PPV = 93.75% and NPP = 90%. While for paralysis, the anterior ultrasonography approach diagnostic sensitivity = 86.7%, specificity = 85.7% with PPV = 81.25% and NPV = 90% and the novel lateral ultrasonography approach diagnostic (sensitivity, specificity with PPV and NPP) = 100%. The diagnostic accuracy of the novel lateral approach was more correlated to rigid laryngoscopy (91.7% and 100%) compared to anterior approach for vocal cord edema and paralysis (83.3% and 80.6%). Overall incidence of vocal cord paralysis was 16.6%. Risk of vocal cord paralysis was statistically significant more in female, multiple disc herniation, lower and mixed disc levels, Langenbeck retractor, cage and plate and duration of surgery ≥ 1.5 h. Transcutaneous Laryngeal ultrasound is a valid comfortable tool for prediction of vocal cord edema and paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgeries with superiority of the novel lateral over anterior approach.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks provide postoperative pain relief after various abdominal surgeries. Recently, erector spinae plane (ESP) block has obtained vast attention due to its simplicity and usage in truncal procedures. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block versus bilateral TAP block on postoperative analgesia after open total abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. SETTING: Zagazig University Hospitals. METHODS: After ending of surgical procedure and before reversing of the muscle relaxant, 48 women were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups: erector spinae (ES) group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/mL adrenaline (1:200000) in each side at the level of T9, and transversus abdominis (TA) group received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with the same volume of bupivacaine plus adrenaline. RESULTS: Visual Analog Scale scores at 30 minutes, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours were statistically significantly lower in the ES group compared with the TA group. The time for requirement of first morphine was highly statistically significantly prolonged in the ES group (14.81 ± 3.52 hours) compared with the TA group (10.58 ± 2.35 hours). The total amount of morphine consumption in 24 hours postoperatively was statistically significantly decreased in the ES group; P = 0.01. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher but statistically insignificant in the TA group than the ES group. There were statistically significant numbers of unsatisfied patients (4) in the TA group compared with the ES group (no patient). LIMITATIONS: Sensorial evaluation of patients was not performed because both blocks had been done under general anesthesia but did not affect outcome. Therefore we recommend further studies comparing between both blocks. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block provides more potent and longer postoperative analgesia with less morphine consumption than TAP block after open total abdominal hysterectomy. KEY WORDS: Abdominal hysterectomy, transversus abdominis plane block, erector spinae plane block, postoperative analgesia.

Analgo-Sedative Effects of Oral or Nebulized Ketamine in Preschoolers Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Comparative, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: Premedication in children with ketamine is useful to produce mild sedation, decrease anxiety, help the child separation from parents, and provide postoperative pain relief with no or little adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the level of sedation, parental separation, successful venous cannulation, and postoperative analgesia of oral or nebulized ketamine in preschoolers undergoing elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, comparative, double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Zagazig University Hospitals. METHODS: In the preparation room, 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia, 62 children were randomly divided into 2 groups: group O (n = 31) received oral ketamine 10 mg/kg in 2 mL apple juice, and group N (n = 31) received nebulized ketamine 3 mg/kg plus 2 mL isotonic saline solution by a standard hospital jet nebulizer via a mouth mask with a continuous 6 L/min flow of 100% oxygen. RESULTS: At 10 minutes after premedication, sedation score was 3 in group O (34.4%) compared with group N (0%), and at 20 minutes in group O (93.5%) compared with group N (9.6%) (P < 0.001 ). However, at 30 minutes, 51.6% of group O showed a sedation score of 1 versus 0% of group N (P < 0.001 ). There were 70.9% of group O versus 6.4% of group N who showed an Emotional State Score of 1 (P < 0.0001), and 29.03% of group O versus 19.3% of group N who showed an Emotional State Score of 2 (P = 0.37), with statistically nonsignificant adverse effects in both groups. Low mean modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale score in group O compared with group N at 30, 60, 90 minutes (P < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: In this study, although the dose of nebulized ketamine was 3 mg/kg, which was more than the optimum dose investigated in previous studies, it was not adequate, so we recommend conducting more studies investigating higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ketamine 10 mg/kg as premedication 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia is more effective than 3 mg/kg nebulized ketamine in producing more sedation, satisfactory separation from parents, successful venous cannulation, and effective postoperative analgesia, as it is more tolerable and accepted by preschoolers undergoing elective surgery. KEY WORDS: Nebulized ketamine, oral ketamine, preschooler, elective surgery.