Amyloid Burden Correlates with Electrocardiographic Findings in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis-Insights from Histology and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is associated with several distinct electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. However, the impact of amyloid depositions on ECG parameters is not well investigated. We therefore aimed to assess the correlation of amyloid burden with ECG and test the prognostic power of ECG findings on outcomes in patients with CA. Consecutive CA patients underwent ECG assessment and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), including the quantification of extracellular volume (ECV) with T1 mapping. Moreover, seven patients underwent additional amyloid quantification using immunohistochemistry staining of endomyocardial biopsies. A total of 105 CA patients (wild-type transthyretin: 74.3%, variant transthyretin: 8.6%, light chain: 17.1%) were analyzed for this study. We detected correlations of total QRS voltage with histologically quantified amyloid burden (r = -0.780, p = 0.039) and ECV (r = -0.266, p = 0.006). In patients above the ECV median (43.9%), PR intervals were significantly longer (p = 0.016) and left anterior fascicular blocks were more prevalent (p = 0.025). In our survival analysis, neither Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.996) nor Cox regression analysis detected associations of QRS voltage with adverse patient outcomes (hazard ratio: 0.995, p = 0.265). The present study demonstrated that an increased amyloid burden is associated with lower voltages in CA patients. However, baseline ECG findings, including QRS voltage, were not associated with adverse outcomes.

Myocardial structural and functional changes in cardiac amyloidosis: insights from a prospective observational patient registry.

AIMS: The pathophysiological hallmark of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is the deposition of amyloid within the myocardium. Consequently, extracellular volume (ECV) of affected patients increases. However, studies on ECV progression over time are lacking. We aimed to investigate the progression of ECV and its prognostic impact in CA patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations, including ECV quantification, were performed in consecutive CA patients. Between 2012 and 2021, 103 CA patients underwent baseline and follow-up CMR, including ECV quantification. Median ECVs at baseline of the total (n = 103), transthyretin [(ATTR) n = 80], and [light chain (AL) n = 23] CA cohorts were 48.0%, 49.0%, and 42.6%, respectively. During a median period of 12 months, ECV increased significantly in all cohorts [change (Δ) +3.5% interquartile range (IQR): -1.9 to +6.9, P < 0.001; Δ +3.5%, IQR: -2.0 to +6.7, P < 0.001; and Δ +3.5%, IQR: -1.6 to +9.1, P = 0.026]. Separate analyses for treatment-naïve (n = 21) and treated (n = 59) ATTR patients revealed that the median change of ECV from baseline to follow-up was significantly higher among untreated patients (+5.7% vs. +2.3%, P = 0.004). Survival analyses demonstrated that median change of ECV was a predictor of outcome [total: hazard ratio (HR): 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047-1.0145, P < 0.001; ATTR: HR: 1.073, 95% CI: 1.015-1.134, P = 0.013; and AL: HR: 1.131, 95% CI: 1.041-1.228, P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The present study supports the use of serial ECV quantification in CA patients, as change of ECV was a predictor of outcome and could provide information in the evaluation of amyloid-specific treatments.

Cerebral Protection in TAVR-Can We Do Without? A Real-World All-Comer Intention-to-Treat Study-Impact on Stroke Rate, Length of Hospital Stay, and Twelve-Month Mortality.

Background: Stroke associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a potentially devastating complication. Until recently, the Sentinel™ Cerebral Protection System (CPS; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has been the only commercially available device for mechanical prevention of TAVR-related stroke. However, its effectiveness is still undetermined. Objectives: To explore the impact of Sentinel™ on stroke rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and twelve-month mortality in a single-center, real-world, all-comers TAVR cohort. Material and Methods: Between January 2019 and August 2020 consecutive patients were assigned to TAVR with or without Sentinel™ in a 1:1 fashion according to the treating operator. We defined as primary endpoint clinically detectable cerebrovascular events within 72 h after TAVR and as secondary endpoints LOS and 12-month mortality. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess associations of Sentinel™ use with endpoints. Results: Of 411 patients (80 ± 7 y/o, 47.4% female, EuroSCORE II 6.3 ± 5.9%), Sentinel™ was used in 213 (51.8%), with both filters correctly deployed in 189 (46.0%). Twenty (4.9%) cerebrovascular events were recorded, ten (2.4%) of which were disabling strokes. Patients with Sentinel™ suffered 71% less (univariate analysis; OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.11-0.82; p = 0.02) and, respectively, 76% less (multivariate analysis; OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.08-0.76; p = 0.02) cerebrovascular events compared to patients without Sentinel™. Sentinel™ use was also significantly associated with shorter LOS (Regression coefficient -2.47, 95%CI -4.08, -0.87; p < 0.01) and lower 12-month all-cause mortality (OR 0.45; 95%CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03). Conclusion: In the present prospective all-comers TAVR cohort, patients with Sentinel™ use showed (1) lower rates of cerebrovascular events, (2) shortened LOS, and (3) improved 12-month survival. These data promote the use of a CPS when implanting TAVR valves.

Erratum to: Outcomes of anatomical vs. functional testing for coronary artery disease : Lessons from the major trials.

In the above-mentioned article, in the section "Other randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, and registry data" two subheadings were swapped by mistake. The sections concerned must instead be headed as ….

Outcomes of anatomical vs. functional testing for coronary artery disease : Lessons from the major trials.

Management of patients presenting with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are challenging because estimation of pretest probability for obstructive CAD remains difficult. In addition, identification of those who benefit from coronary revascularization remains ineffective regardless of the wide array of noninvasive testing alternatives available. Functional testing, which has long been considered to be the test of choice to risk stratify these patients, shows modest agreement with CAD severity detected by invasive coronary angiography and has been reported to be ineffective in settings of low prevalence of obstructive CAD. A growing body of evidence demonstrates the excellent diagnostic accuracy as well as prognostic value of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography especially in conjunction with noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) testing, challenging the primary role of functional testing especially in patients without prior or known CAD. Landmark trials, including the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain (PROMISE) and Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART), have contributed to a better understanding of how coronary CT angiography may play a role in more efficient management and even improved health outcomes. The emerging role of coronary CT has been acknowledged by the 2019 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommending the use of CT as a first-line tool for the evaluation of patients with stable chest pain with a class I, level of evidence B recommendation. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview on existing evidence, clinical implication, limitations of available data, and remaining questions to be answered by future research.