Building a framework to decolonize global emergency medicine.

Background: Global emergency medicine (GEM) is situated at the intersection of global health and emergency medicine (EM), which is built upon a history of colonial systems and institutions that continue to reinforce inequities between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) today. These power imbalances yield disparities in GEM practice, research, and education. Approach: The Global Emergency Medicine Academy (GEMA) of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine formed the Decolonizing GEM Working Group in 2020, which now includes over 100 worldwide members. The mission is to address colonial legacies in GEM and catalyze sustainable changes and recommendations toward decolonization at individual and institutional levels. To develop recommendations to decolonize GEM, the group conducted a nonsystematic review of existing literature on decolonizing global health, followed by in-depth discussions between academics from LMICs and HICs to explore implications and challenges specific to GEM. We then synthesized actionable solutions to provide recommendations on decolonizing GEM. Results: Despite the rapidly expanding body of literature on decolonizing global health, there is little guidance specific to the relatively new field of GEM. By applying decolonizing principles to GEM, we suggest key priorities for improving equity in academic GEM: (1) reframing partnerships to place LMIC academics in positions of expertise and power, (2) redirecting research funding toward LMIC-driven projects and investigators, (3) creating more equitable practices in establishing authorship, and (4) upholding principles of decolonization in the education of EM trainees from LMICs and HICs. Conclusions: Understanding the colonial roots of GEM will allow us to look more critically at current health disparities and identify inequitable institutionalized practices within our profession that continue to uphold these misguided concepts. A decolonized future of GEM depends on our recognition and rectification of colonial-era practices that shape structural determinants of health care delivery and scientific advancement.

COVID-19 vaccine coverage, determinants and inequity amongst refugees and migrants in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Migrants and refugees are at a disadvantage in accessing basic necessities. The objective of this study is to assess the inequity in access, needs and determinants of COVID-19 vaccination among refugees and migrant populations in Pakistan. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-method study comprising a cross-sectional survey and a qualitative study. In this paper, we will only report the findings from the cross-sectional survey. SETTING: This survey was conducted in different cities of Pakistan including Quetta, Karachi and Hyderabad. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 570 participants were surveyed including refugees and migrants, both in regular and irregular situations. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the study was to estimate the proportion of refugees and migrants, both in regular and irregular situations vaccinated against COVID-19 and assess the inequity. The χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine the significant differences in proportions between refugees and migrants and between regions. RESULTS: The survey showed that only 26.9% of the refugee and migrant population were tested for COVID-19, 4.56% contracted coronavirus, and 3.85% were hospitalised due to COVID-19. About 66% of the refugees and migrants were fully vaccinated including those who received the single-dose vaccine or received all two doses, and 17.6% were partially vaccinated. Despite vaccination campaigns by the government, 14.4% of the refugee and migrant population remained unvaccinated mostly because of vaccines not being offered, distant vaccination sites, limited access, unavailability of COVID-19 vaccine or due to a difficult registration process. Vaccination rates varied across provinces, genders and migrant populations due to misconceptions, and several social, cultural and geographical barriers. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the COVID-19 vaccine coverage, access and inequity faced by refugees and migrants during the pandemic. It suggests early prioritisation of policies inclusive of all refugees and migrants and the provision of identification documents to ease access to basic necessities.

Clinical Outcomes of Children With COVID-19 by SARS-CoV-2 Strain: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the disease outcomes and predictors of severe outcomes among children infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 compared with pre-Delta strains. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study in an emergency department located within an urban academic children's hospital. Patients included children (0-18 years) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Main outcomes measured include need for hospital admission or COVID-directed therapies. RESULTS: There was a trend toward decreased hospital admission and no significant difference in the severity of outcomes in the Delta cohort relative to the pre-Delta cohort. The Delta cohort had lower odds of hospital admission (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.23), but the result was not statistically significant. Logistic regression analyses showed that overall, age 1 to 4 years (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.23-4.57) and public insurance (OR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.08-3.01) were predictors of hospital admission. Within the Delta cohort, the presence of any comorbidity increased the odds of admission (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.09-6.04). Black children had lower odds of admission than white children (overall OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90; pre-Delta OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of measured disease outcomes was similar in pediatric patients when comparing children infected with the pre-Delta and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2, even among children with comorbidities once adjusting for acuity.Ongoing research is essential to determine disease severity and risk for children with comorbidities because SARS-CoV-2 continues to mutate, including with Omicron subvariants.

The impacts of the Syrian conflict on child and adolescent health: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The Syrian conflict has had a profound impact on Syrian children and adolescents. We sought to determine the extent and range of literature on the conflict's health effects on this vulnerable population. METHODS: A scoping review describing the impact of the Syrian conflict on children was undertaken while utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews methodology. Qualitative thematic analyses were undertaken to both identify patterns of morbidity and mortality and gaps in evidence. RESULTS: A total of 982 articles meeting search criteria were identified between 1 January 2011 and 30 April 2021. After iterative screening, 12 were identified from academic databases and 4 were identified from grey literature and hand searching, yielding a total of 16 studies for final, full-text analysis. Four distinct themes recurred in the literature; these include children suffering from violent injury, a resurgence of communicable diseases, malnutrition and micronutrient deficiency and impacts on their mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The health of children and adolescents in Syria has been significantly impacted by the indiscriminate attacks against civilians, flagrant human rights violations and the disintegration of the national health care system. Neonates were largely absent from the literature. The themes from this scoping review can inform health programming priorities by aid organizations.

The delivery of essential newborn care in conflict settings: A systematic review.

Introduction: Although progress has been made over the past 30 years to decrease neonatal mortality rates, reductions have been uneven. Globally, the highest neonatal mortality rates are concentrated in countries chronically affected by conflict. Essential newborn care (ENC), which comprises critical therapeutic interventions for every newborn, such as thermal care, initiation of breathing, feeding support, and infection prevention, is an important strategy to decrease neonatal mortality in humanitarian settings. We sought to understand the barriers to and facilitators of ENC delivery in conflict settings. Methods: We systematically searched Ovid/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases using terms related to conflict, newborns, and health care delivery. We also reviewed grey literature from the Healthy Newborn Network and several international non-governmental organization databases. We included original research on conflict-affected populations that primarily focused on ENC delivery. Study characteristics were extracted and descriptively analyzed, and quality assessments were performed. Results: A total of 1,533 abstracts were screened, and ten publications met the criteria for final full-text review. Several barriers emerged from the reviewed studies and were subdivided by barrier level: patient, staff, facility, and humanitarian setting. Patients faced obstacles related to transportation, cost, and access, and mothers had poor knowledge of newborn danger signs. There were difficulties related to training and retaining staff. Facilities lacked supplies, protocols, and data collection strategies. Conclusions: Strategies for improved ENC implementation include maternal and provider education and increasing facility readiness through upgrades in infrastructure, guidelines, and health information systems. Community-based approaches may also play a vital role in strengthening ENC.

Relationship Between Adolescent Report of Patient-Centered Care and of Quality of Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined adolescent self-report of patient-centered care (PCC). We investigated whether adolescent self-report of PCC varied by patient characteristics and whether receipt of PCC is associated with measures of adolescent primary care quality. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from Healthy Passages, a population-based survey of 4105 10th graders and their parents. Adolescent report of PCC was derived from 4 items. Adolescent primary care quality was assessed by measuring access to confidential care, screening for important adolescent health topics, unmet need, and overall rating of health care. We conducted weighted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models of the association of PCC with adolescent characteristics and primary care quality. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of adolescents reported that they received PCC. Report of receiving PCC was associated with high quality for other measures, such as having a private conversation with a clinician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.9, 2.6]) and having talked about health behaviors (aOR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4, 1.8); it was also associated with lower likelihood for self-reported unmet need for care (aOR 0.8; 95% CI 0.7, 0.9) and having a serious untreated health problem (aOR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3, 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Many adolescents do not report receiving PCC. Adolescent-reported PCC positively correlates with measures of high-quality adolescent primary care. Our study provides support for using adolescent-report of PCC as a measure of adolescent primary care quality.

MR enterography correlates highly with colonoscopy and histology for both distal ileal and colonic Crohn's disease in 310 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of MR enterography (MRE) in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease without the use of anti-peristaltic pharmacologic agents compared to colonoscopy and histology. METHODS: A retrospective review of 850 consecutive patients who underwent routine MRE to evaluate known or suspected Crohn's disease was performed. Of these, 310 patients also underwent colonoscopy with biopsy(s) within 90 days. The results of the MRE were compared to the colonoscopy and pathology reports to determine the presence or absence of disease in evaluable bowel segments. Individual imaging parameters (including wall thickening, enhancement, T2 signal, mesenteric vascular prominence and adenopathy) were also separately analyzed to determine their independent predictive value. RESULTS: In 310 patients, the overall sensitivity and specificity of MRE (using endoscopy as a gold standard) were 85% and 80% respectively (kappa=0.65). The sensitivity of MRE for detection of pathologically severe disease was 87% in the terminal ileum (TI) and 88% in the colon. In the subset of 162 patients who underwent colonoscopy within 30 days of MRE, the overall sensitivity remained 85% but the specificity increased to 85% (kappa=0.69). Wall thickening and abnormal enhancement were sensitive indicators of Crohn's disease (75% and 78%), while abnormal T2 signal, mesenteric vascular prominence and adenopathy were specific (86%, 91% and 93%). CONCLUSION: MRE compares favorably to colonoscopy for evaluation of known or suspected Crohn's disease noninvasively and without the exposure to ionizing radiation associated with CT enterography (CTE).

The aging of the HIV epidemic.

Since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy, life expectancies for persons with HIV infection are similar to those for uninfected people. A growing proportion of HIV-infected individuals are now over the age of 50. We are also seeing an increase in the incidence of HIV infection in older adults. To meet the challenges of the ongoing HIV epidemic, prevention efforts should include a focus on older adults. Also, HIV care providers must address the many comorbidities that are common in the aging population. Additional research will clarify how the processes of aging and HIV infection overlap and interact. This review addresses many of these important considerations.