Nonischemic or Dual Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials in obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) have largely shown no prognostic benefit from coronary revascularization. Although there are several potential reasons for the lack of benefit, an underexplored possible reason is the presence of coincidental nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We investigated the prevalence and prognostic significance of NICM in patients with CAD (CAD-NICM). METHODS: We conducted a registry study of consecutive patients with obstructive CAD on coronary angiography who underwent contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ventricular function and scar at 4 hospitals from 2004 to 2020. We identified the presence and cause of cardiomyopathy using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography data, blinded to clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization, and secondary outcomes were all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among 3023 patients (median age, 66 years; 76% men), 18.2% had no cardiomyopathy, 64.8% had ischemic cardiomyopathy (CAD+ICM), 9.3% had CAD+NICM, and 7.7% had dual cardiomyopathy (CAD+dualCM), defined as both ICM and NICM. Thus, 16.9% had CAD+NICM or dualCM. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.9, 7.6), 1116 patients experienced the primary outcome. In Cox multivariable analysis, CAD+NICM or dualCM was independently associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome compared with CAD+ICM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.06-1.43]; P=0.007) after adjustment for potential confounders. The risks of the secondary outcomes of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization were also higher with CAD+NICM or dualCM (hazard ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.43]; P=0.032; and hazard ratio, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.11-1.69]; P=0.003, respectively), whereas the risk of cardiovascular death did not differ from that of CAD+ICM (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.89-1.48]; P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CAD referred for clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, NICM or dualCM was identified in 1 of every 6 patients and was associated with worse long-term outcomes compared with ICM. In patients with obstructive CAD, coincidental NICM or dualCM may contribute to the lack of prognostic benefit from coronary revascularization.

The primary cardiomyopathy of systemic sclerosis on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS: Cardiac disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc) may be primary or secondary to other disease manifestations of SSc. The prevalence of the primary cardiomyopathy of SSc is unknown. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can help accurately determine the presence and cause of cardiomyopathy. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, the CMR features, and the prognostic implications of the primary cardiomyopathy of SSc. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with SSc who had a clinical CMR for suspected cardiac involvement. We identified the prevalence, the CMR features of the primary cardiomyopathy of SSc, and its association with the long-term incidence of death or major adverse cardiac events (MACEs): heart failure hospitalization, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, and sustained ventricular tachycardia. Of 130 patients with SSc, 80% were women, and the median age was 58 years. On CMR, 22% had an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction, and 40% had late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The prevalence of the primary cardiomyopathy of SSc was 21%. A third of these patients had a distinct LGE phenotype. Over a median follow-up of 3.6 years after the CMR, patients with the primary cardiomyopathy of SSc had a greater incidence of death or MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 2.01; 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.92; P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the primary cardiomyopathy of SSc was 21%, with a third demonstrating a distinct LGE phenotype. The primary cardiomyopathy of SSc was independently associated with a greater long-term incidence of death or MACE.

Interplay of CT Coronary Plaque Characteristics and Ischemia to Predict Adverse Outcomes.

In 134 patients with stable coronary artery disease, high-risk plaque features at CT and physiologic stenosis were found to act in a synergistic fashion to predict adverse outcomes.

Impact of 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncardiac chest CT scans on lung cancer screening CT reporting.

The 2016 SCCT/STR guideline for coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring on non-cardiac chest CT (NCCT) scans explicitly calls for the reporting of CAC. Whether the publication of the 2016 SCCT/STR guideline has had any impact on CAC reporting in lung cancer screening (LCS) scans has not been investigated. Consecutive patients with a LCS scan were identified from the University of Minnesota LCS registry and evaluated for CAC reporting in 3 separate cohorts: 6 months before, 6 months after, and 1 year after the publication of the 2016 SCCT/STR guideline. Scans were evaluated for CAC and quantified using the Agatston method. CAC reporting, downstream testing and initiation of preventive therapy were assessed. Among 614 patients (50% male, mean age 64.1 ± 6.0 years), CAC was present in 460 (74.9%) with a median Agatston score of 62 (IQR 0, 230). Of these, 196 (31.9%) had a CAC score of 1-100, 125 (20.4%) had 101-300, and 118 (19.2%) had > 300. Overall, CAC was reported in 325 (70.7%) patients with CAC present. CAC reporting relative to publication of the 2016 SCCT/STR guideline was as follows: 6 months prior-74.1%, 6 months after-64.6%, and 1 year after-77.5%. In the 308 patients with a new diagnosis of sub-clinical CAD based on CAC presence, 6 (1.9%) patients were referred to cardiology, and 15 (4.9%) patients underwent testing for obstructive CAD. Only 6 (1.9%) and 9 (2.9%) patients were newly started on aspirin and statin respectively. CAC detected incidentally on lung cancer screening CT scans is prevalent, and rarely acted upon clinically. CAC reporting is fairly high, and publication of the 2016 SCCT/STR guideline for CAC scoring on NCCT scans did not have any significant impact on CAC reporting.