Metformin diminishes the unfavourable impact of Nrf2 in breast cancer patients with type 2 diabetes.

Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) is a major regulator of the oxidative stress response and it is negatively regulated by Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1). The Keap1-Nrf2 axis has a fundamental role in carcinogenesis. In previous studies, the widely used diabetes drug metformin has appeared to have a critical role in the regulation of Nrf2 function. In this study, we assessed the expression of Nrf2 and Keap1 immunohistochemically in 157 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent breast cancer surgery with curative intent. In total, 78 (49.7%) of these patients were taking metformin alone or combined with other oral anti-diabetic medication at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. We found that high-level cytoplasmic Nrf2 expression predicted dismal overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival, but only in the patients who were not taking metformin at the time of diagnosis. Similarly, low-level nuclear Keap1 expression had an adverse prognostic value in terms of overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival in patients without metformin. On the other hand, high-level nuclear Keap1 expression was associated with prolonged overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. The results may be explained in terms of non-functioning or displaced Keap1, although more mechanistic pre-clinical and prospective clinical studies are warranted.

Antidiabetic Medication, Statins and the Risk and Prognosis of Non-endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in Women with Type 2 Diabetes.

AIM: To determine the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in relation to the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to analyze the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC, two cohorts were obtained from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM); 57 non-endometrioid ECs were observed in a cohort of 92,366 women with newly-diagnosed T2D during the follow-up (1996 to 2011) to assess the incidence, and a retrospective cohort of 105 women with T2D diagnosed with non-endometrioid EC (1998 to 2011) was used to estimate cumulative mortality from EC and other causes of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC incidence were estimated in the full-cohort analysis and in the nested case-control analysis, matched for age and duration of T2D. Cumulative mortality was estimated by using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Cause-specific mortality rates were analyzed by using Cox models regarding the pre-diagnostic use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, the use of metformin was not associated with the risk of non-endometrioid EC (HR=1.09, 95% CI=0.59-2.00), whereas statin use was associated with a lower risk (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.26-0.84). The results from the full-cohort analysis supported these findings. Mortality from non-endometrioid EC was not different between users of metformin and other types of oral ADM (HR=1.56, 95% CI=0.40-6.07) but was observed to be lower in statin users (HR=0.41, 95% CI=0.20-0.82). CONCLUSION: Our findings were inconclusive regarding the association of metformin with the risk and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC. However, statin use was associated with a lower incidence and mortality from this disease.

Prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with type 2 diabetes using metformin and other forms of antidiabetic medication or statins: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have even poorer survival from it. We assessed the prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin, other forms of antidiabetic medication, or statins. METHODS: Study cohort consisted of women with T2D diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Finland 1998-2011. They were identified from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM), being linked to several national registers. Patients were grouped according to their medication in the three years preceding ovarian cancer diagnosis. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to describe cumulative mortality from ovarian cancer and from other causes in different medication groups. Mortality rates were analysed by Cox models, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated in relation to the use of different forms of medication. Main outcome measures were death from ovarian cancer and death from other causes. RESULTS: During the accrual period 421 newly diagnosed ovarian cancers were identified in the FinDM database. No evidence was found for any differences in mortality from ovarian cancer or other causes between different antidiabetic medication groups. Pre-diagnostic use of statins was observed to be associated with decreased mortality from ovarian cancer compared with no such use (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are inconclusive as regards the association between metformin and ovarian cancer survival. However, some evidence was found for improved prognosis of ovarian cancer with pre-diagnostic statin use, requiring cautious interpretation, though.

Antidiabetic medication, statins and the risk of endometrioid endometrial cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To gain further evidence of an association between the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) and the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 92,366 women with newly diagnosed T2D was obtained from a diabetes register (FinDM). 590 endometrioid ECs were observed during the follow-up time. Poisson regression was utilized to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the endometrioid EC in relation to the use of metformin, other oral ADM, insulin and statins. Nested case-control analyses were performed, where up to 20 controls were matched for age and duration of DM for each EC case. The HRs were estimated by conditional logistic regression for never/ever and cumulative use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the case-control analyses the use of metformin (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.51) and other oral ADM (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50) was associated with an increased incidence of endometrioid EC compared to no ADM use. No difference was observed between metformin users and those using other oral ADMs. The use of statins was inversely related to the incidence of endometrioid EC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94). Results from the full cohort analysis supported this finding. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the use of metformin or other oral forms of ADM was not associated with a lowered risk of endometrioid EC in women with T2D. Instead statins were observed to be inversely associated with endometrioid EC in this population.