Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Study.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine (with 1:200,000 adrenaline) during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and methods: The study included 75 patients randomly divided into three equal groups of 25 patients each. The study variables were: onset of anesthetic action, duration of surgery and anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. A visual analog scale was used to assess pain at different time intervals. Statistical analysis revealed insignificant difference among groups in terms of volume of anesthetic solution used, quality of anesthesia, surgical difficulty and duration of surgery. Results: The mean onset time was significantly (P < 0.001) shorter for articaine (1.14 min) than ropivacaine (2.18 min) and bupivacaine (2.33 min). However, the duration of anesthesia as well as analgesia was significantly (P < 0.001) longer for bupivacaine (483.6 min and 464 min) and ropivacaine (426.6 min and 459 min) as compared to articaine (232.8 min and 191.4 min), respectively. Also, on comparing three groups pain scores at 6th postoperative hour were significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Ropivacaine and bupivacaine can be safely used in patients where longer duration of surgery is anticipated.

Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate.

Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of titanium 2.0-mm curved locking strut plate and 2.0-mm straight locking miniplate with regard to their intraoperative use and the stability of fixation achieved both, clinically and radiographically. Materials and Methods: Forty patients with 62 sites of mandibular fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation were included in the study. The sample was divided into two groups of twenty patients each depending upon whether patient received three-dimensional 2.0-mm locking curved strut plate (group A) or 2.0-mm straight locking miniplates (group B). Mouth opening, teeth in the fracture line, degree of displacement, time taken, neurosensory and bite force evaluation were done preoperatively, 1st, 7th day, 2nd week, 4th week, 6th week and 12th week postoperatively. Results: Positive correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative bite force values at subsequent follow-up weeks. At 3rd month evaluation, the change in bite force from the previous follow-up visit was significantly greater in group A (locking strut plate) than group B (locking miniplate) in the incisor, left molar and right molar region. Statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding time taken (P < 0.016) depicting less time taken for placement of three-dimensional 2.0-mm locking curved strut plate(group A) 20.30 ± 4.85 min as compared to 27.30 ± 6.82 min for fixation with 2.0 mm straight locking miniplates in group B. Conclusion: The findings were suggestive that the both systems had better adaptation during fixation, comparable radiographic reduction and increased stability in postoperative period. However, 3D locking strut plate took relatively lesser operative time, offered good rigidity and better stabilization of fractured segments in three dimensions along with significant improvement in the masticatory bite force postoperatively.

Assessment and Correlation of Variation in Lingual Cortical Plate Thickness with Different Angulations of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in North Indian Population.

Purpose: The extraction of impacted mandibular third molar is associated with various types of intraoperative and postoperative complications, one of them is injury to lingual nerve. The present study aims to assess and correlate the variation in lingual cortical plate thickness with different angulations and determine the topographic relationship between the root apex of impacted mandibular third molar and lingual cortical plate using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 140 patients with impacted mandibular third molars who underwent preoperative CBCT imaging. The CBCT images were used to evaluate the outcome variables such as lingual cortical plate thickness and topographical relationship between root apex of impacted mandibular third molar and lingual cortical plate. The predictor variables included age, gender, inclination of third molar, mesiodistal angle, buccolingual angle and lingual plate morphology. Results: The temporary lingual nerve paresthesia was reported by 1 patient (0.71%) out of 140 patients. The lingual bone in distoangular and vertical impacted third molar was found to be 1.20 times thicker than mesioangular and horizontal teeth. Lingual bone thinning at mid-root level was observed in maximum number of cases with mesioangular teeth (68.5%), whereas horizontal impacted teeth showed lingual bone thinning (90.9%) at root apex level. The mean buccolingual angle of impacted mandibular third molar was found to be significantly associated with lingual bone perforation (p value = 0.0258). The morphology of lingual plate was observed as undercut type (37.14%) followed by slanted (36.43%), parallel (19.29%) and round type (7.14%). Conclusion: Increase in buccolingual angle of impacted mandibular third molar decreases lingual bone thickness which is the natural barrier for protecting injury to lingual nerve. Also undercut and slanted lingual plate shapes were recognised as risk factors for contact/perforation between root apex and lingual plate. Therefore, proper screening and planning of high risk patients before third molar extraction is crucial.

Are Embrasure Wires Effective and Reliable Method for Intraoperative Maxillomandibular Fixation in Mandibular Fractures?

Purpose: Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) is a basic and fundamental principle in the management of the maxillofacial trauma patients. Some fractures require only intraoperative MMF, during open reduction and internal fixation but not in the postoperative period. The present study was aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of embrasure wire with Erich arch bar as methods of intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation in the management of mandibular fractures. Materials and Methods: The prospective randomized study was undertaken in 30 patients who required intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation for mandibular fractures. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 15 each (Erich arch bar in Group A and embrasure wire in Group B). The preoperative assessment included evaluation of demographic data, fracture location, mechanism of injury, degree of displacement of fracture and occlusion. Intraoperative parameters assessed were the time consumed for the application of MMF technique, injury to the operator/assistant, injury to the patient, stability of MMF technique, incidence of glove perforations and the cost of the MMF device. Results: The mean time required for MMF and incidence of glove perforation were significantly (P < 0.001) less in embrasure wire group than the Erich arch bar group. The MMF technique maintained stable occlusion during open reduction and internal fixation in both the groups. Conclusion: Embrasure wire is an effective, reliable alternative form of intraoperative MMF, as needle-stick injury and time taken for placement were less as compared to the Erich arch bar group. However, Erich arch bar wiring is a versatile method and recommended where postoperative maxillomandibular fixation is also required.

Use of Physics Forceps in Atraumatic Orthodontic Extractions of Bilateral Premolars: A Randomized Control Clinical Study.

INTRODUCTION: Various atraumatic tooth extraction techniques have gained popularity over the last few decades, and numerous instruments have been devised for the same. A pair of physics forceps is one such instrument that maintains the integrity of the gingival and surrounding periodontium while delivering the tooth out of the socket atraumatically. Extractions using these forceps are less invasive over conventional forceps using less intraoperative time but are technique sensitive and have a definitive learning curve. AIM: To compare the efficacy of physics forceps with conventional forceps in the orthodontic extraction of bilateral premolars and to compare the clinical outcome and complications of each. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized split-mouth study, all the patients (n = 50) and total premolars (n = 200) were divided into two groups, in which first premolars in maxillary and mandibular quadrant on one side were extracted with physics forceps (n = 100), whereas those in the other 2 quadrants was done with conventional forceps (n = 100). Clinical outcomes in the form of time taken for extraction, postoperative pain, total number of analgesics taken, buccal cortical plate fracture, soft tissue healing after extraction and other complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean time for extraction of premolars with physics forceps was significantly less as compared to the conventional forceps (P 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative pain on any of the postoperative days, between both the groups. No major complication except root fracture was seen in 3 teeth in physics forceps group. Soft tissue healing was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Physics forceps are an effective method of atraumatic extraction of premolars as it reduce the intraoperative time significantly and have comparable clinical outcomes as the conventional forceps and are associated with few complications.

Efficacy of Titanium Mesh Osteosynthesis in Maxillofacial Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is steadily increasing in the modern world and thus becoming a major public problem. Maxillofacial injuries constitute a substantial proportion of cases of trauma and occur in a variety of situations like road traffic accidents, interpersonal violence, falls or as a result of contact sports. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of titanium mesh for osteosynthesis of maxillofacial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients of maxillofacial fractures who were treated with titanium mesh were included in this prospective study. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively at 7th day, 3rd week, 6th week and 12th week. RESULTS: The mean age of fifteen patients was 31.3 years with a male:female ratio of 14:1. The most common mode of injury was road traffic accident (86.6%). The mean time interval between injury and surgical procedure was found to be 7.6 days. The majority of fracture sites (88%) were comminuted. 93.3% of the patients achieved good occlusion by 12th week postoperatively. Postoperative complications included residual hypoaesthesia in four patients and wound dehiscence in one patient. CONCLUSION: We conclude that titanium mesh is a versatile option for maxillofacial fractures. It provided good stabilization especially in comminuted fractures. As a fixation method, it was quick in placement and highly adaptable, and thus, it proved to be valuable in restoring the form and function in maxillofacial trauma patients.

Comparison of Efficacy of Transalveolar Screws and Conventional Dental Wiring Using Erich Arch Bar for Maxillomandibular Fixation in Mandibular Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillomandibular fixation is required in nearly all cases of facial fractures which can be achieved by conventional dental wiring techniques or newer methods using transalveolar screws. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical study divided into two groups with thirty adult patients each with mandibular fractures was undertaken comparing the Maxillomandibular fixation technique using transalveolar screws and Erichs arch bar. Total time taken, rate of glove perforation, intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted in both the groups. RESULTS: The time taken for maxillomandibular fixation in minutes and rate of glove perforation was found to be statistically significantly less for transalveolar group compared to arch bar group (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference found in the oral hygiene and gingival status using the Glass index and Gingival index. The rate of screw breakage (04.67%), wire breakage (05.12%), non-vitality due to iatrogenic dental damage (01.66%), soft tissue injury and tooth loss were some of the noted complications during the study. CONCLUSION: We found that transalveolar group offered advantages like less time taken with a definite decreased risk of percutaneous injury, while the iatrogenic complications like dental damage can be reduced by taking adequate precautions.

Use of 0.5% bupivacaine with buprenorphine in minor oral surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Minor oral surgical procedures are the most commonly performed procedures by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Performance of painless surgical procedure is highly appreciated by the patients and is possible through the use of local anesthesia, conscious sedation or general anesthesia. Postoperative pain can also be controlled by the use of opioids, as opioid receptors exist in the peripheral nervous system and offers the possibility of providing postoperative analgesia in the surgical patient. The present study compares the efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.3 mg buprenorphine in minor oral surgical procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted in 50 patients who required minor oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia. Two types of local anesthetic solutions were used- 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200000 epinephrine in group I and a mixture of 39 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200000 and 1 ml of 300 µg buprenorphine (3 µg/kg)in group II. Intraoperative and postoperative evaluation was carried out for both the anesthetic solutions. RESULTS: The mean duration of postoperative analgesia in bupivacaine group (508.92 ± 63.30 minutes) was quite less than the buprenorphine combination group (1840.84 ± 819.51 minutes). The mean dose of postoperative analgesic medication in bupivacaine group (1.64 ± 0.99 tablets) was higher than buprenorphine combination group (0.80 ± 1.08 tablets). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the onset of action of the anesthetic effect and duration of anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Buprenorphine can be used in combination with bupivacaine for patients undergoing minor oral surgical procedures to provide postoperative analgesia for a longer duration.

Use of hypertonic saline in the management of parotid fistulae and sialocele: a report of 2 cases.

Parotid fistula is a well known complication of parotidectomy or penetrating injury of the parotid gland. Fistulae may be internal or external, but simple internal fistulae are of no surgical interest. In cases of external fistulae, the principles of management aim at the return of normal parotid function in both acute and chronic parotid injury, but sometimes the alternative is to depress parotid secretions to allow natural healing process to seal the injury.The paper highlights the indications, techniques, advantages and disadvantages of using osmotic sclerosant for the management of parotid fistulae. We used warm hypertonic saline injections within the glandular substance to cause rapid fibrosis of the gland in 2 patients of chronic parotid fistulae.This technique is a simple and effective method of dealing with salivary leak. Its ease of performance, effectiveness; minimal surgical risk and minor cost are the advantages over other available options.