Can the Achilles tendon regenerate completely following percutaneous tenotomy in older children with clubfoot?

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to document the outcomes of percutaneous Achilles tenotomy (pAT) performed in older children with clubfoot, by assessing the clinical, functional and ultrasonographic evidence of Achilles tendon regeneration. METHODS: A retrospective case series of older children with clubfoot treated between August 2011 and July 2020 was studied. Clinical assessment of ankle range of motion and calf strength, functional assessment of triceps surae muscle endurance by single leg heel-rise test, and ultrasonographic assessment of Achilles tendon echotexture and dimensions to assess tendon regeneration were performed. RESULTS: Percutaneous Achilles tenotomy was performed on 31 children (48 clubfeet) at a mean age of 5.24 ± 2.14 years (1-10.2 years). At a mean follow-up of 4.86 ± 1.97 years, all children demonstrated normal calf strength with mean dorsiflexion range of 13.64° (0-25°) and mean plantarflexion range of 37.95° (10-40°). The heel-rise endurance test was completed by 27 children with mean 25.85 heel rises/minute (range 17-30) and mean height of heel rise of 6.29 cm (range 4-10 cm). Normal fibrillar tendinous echotexture with homogenous echogenicity was seen on ultrasonography in 41 feet (85.4%) with mean tendon width of 9.7 mm (3.3-16 mm) and thickness of 5.1 mm (1.8-15 mm), comparable with unaffected feet. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, functional and ultrasonographic parameters unequivocally demonstrate complete regeneration of the Achilles tendon, when pAT is performed in older children with delayed-presenting idiopathic clubfoot treated using Ponseti principles.

Is routine removal of syndesmotic screw justified? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Syndesmosis injuries are common with rotational ankle injuries, and placement of a positional syndesmotic screw to maintain its reduction is used as the ligaments heal. There is no clear consensus on routine removal or retention of syndesmotic screw. This study aimed to appraise the current evidence both on removal and retention of syndesmotic screw and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes and rate of complications of syndesmotic screw removal and retention. METHODS: Following PROSPERO registration, a systematic search using was performed using keywords ('Syndesmosis' OR 'Syndesmotic' OR 'Transsyndesmotic' OR 'distal tibiofibular') AND ('Screw') AND ('Removal' OR 'Retention') AND 'Outcome' in various databases. No language restrictions were applied and the meta-analysis incorporated the PRISMA statement. VAS (Visual analogue scale for pain), AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society) scores expressed as mean ± SD, and both groups' complication rates were compared. Comparisons with a random-effects model were performed, and heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using the I2 statistic. T-test for two independent sample means was used to compare pooled mean and Z-test for two proportions to assess the difference in the proportion of complications. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies with 522 patients were included in this review for analysis. Pooled analysis showed non-significant difference in AOFAS score (MD = -1.84; 95% CI: -4.33 to 0.66; p = 0.150) as well as for VAS score (MD = -0.48; 95% CI: -1.56 to 0.60; p = 0.390) between the two groups. The value of z and p-value for complication rates was 0.6021 and 0.5485, respectively, which was not significant. CONCLUSION: There doesn't appear to be a difference in functional outcome, pain scores, and complication rates between patients who had their syndesmotic screws removed and those where screw was retained. The fear of inferior outcomes with retained screws is thus unfounded, and routine removal adds to morbidity and financial burden. In conclusion, present data does not support the routine removal of the intact syndesmosis screw, and a change in practice is needed to abandon routine syndesmotic screw removal.

Technique and Interpretation of Arthrogram for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Closed reduction, arthrography and hip spica application is the treatment of choice for DDH between 6 and 18 months. There is a lot of controversy about what exactly constitutes an "acceptable" closed reduction and arthrogram and the arthrography findings are often difficult to interpret. In this video, the authors describe the technique to perform the arthrogram as well as the interpretation of the same. Various static parameters such as the femoral head coverage, the medial dye pool and the hourglass constriction are shown. In addition, the validity of the safe zone is discussed. With this video technique article, the authors hope that it becomes easy for the budding paediatric orthopaedic surgeon to perform and interpret the DDH arthrogram with ease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00493-4.

Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous publications of the late 20th century have presented the radiological outcome of open technique for distal metatarsal osteotomy for mild to moderate hallux valgus and the clinical outcomes by means of well-established scoring systems which have been published and make these open techniques today's benchmark and gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures reduce surgical trauma because they are performed without large incisions, and injury to the soft tissues is limited. This has the theoretical advantages of improved recovery and decreased rehabilitation times. There is however limited literature to prove the same for minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus.Our aim was thus to pool all available comparative literature on minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery done for mild to moderate hallux valgus versus open surgical approaches. METHODS: A PubMed, Embase and Scopus search was performed using the keywords ('hallux valgus' OR bunion) AND ('minimally invasive' OR percutaneous) AND osteotomy. A total of 473 records were identified and out of which nine studies were included in the final review. RESULTS: Most available studies are either randomized control trials, or prospective cohort studies providing good level of evidence. Radiological analysis showed similar correction with both MIS and open osteotomies. In functional analysis results were different with open techniques providing better results in terms of AOFAS score. (p < 0.0001). VAS score and complication rate were similar in both groups. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We conclude that based on available literature MIS provides equivalent radiological outcomes with respect to open surgery but functionally despite the promising results (good to excellent in most series), the outcomes in terms of function are not as good as open surgery. MIS techniques provide satisfactory outcomes for mild-to-moderate severity of hallux valgus though not as good as open surgery. There is evolving literature for this relatively new procedure. Longer duration of follow up and bigger numbers would allow for more meaningful data analysis and conclusions to be drawn as more studies come forward.