Sex-Based Analysis of Treatment, Time Metrics, and Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated in the Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: Sex disparities in stroke treatment have gained increasing interest, especially since women have worse post-stroke functional outcomes compared with men. Existing studies provide conflicting evidence, with some indicating women have longer delays and less often receive acute treatment, whereas others show no differences between men and women. We aimed to explore sex differences in acute treatment modalities and time metrics of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in a real-world setting. Second, we examined whether functional outcomes differed by sex and whether this was influenced by treatment timing. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Dutch Acute Stroke Audit, a prospective consecutive registry of AIS patients from 72 hospitals in the Netherlands, between 2017 and 2020. We captured data on type of treatment administered (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] and endovascular thrombectomy [EVT]), time metrics (onset-to-door time [OTDT], door-to-needle and door-to-groin times), and functional outcomes at 3 months (modified Rankin scale [mRS]). The association between sex and poor outcome (mRS 3-6) was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models stratified by type of treatment and adjusted for age, additionally for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and OTDT. RESULTS: Of the 58,632 patients, 26,941 (46%) were women. Compared with men, women were older (mean age 74.6 vs. 71.0, p < 0.001) and presented with slightly higher NIHSS scores (median 3 [IQR 2-7] vs. 3 [IQR 1-6], p < 0.001). Treatment modalities distribution (no treatment, IVT, EVT) was similar between women and men (64; 29; 10 vs. 63; 30; 9%, p = 0.16). Women had a slightly longer OTDT (median 145 vs. 139 min, p < 0.01). Women had increased odds of poor outcomes (OR 1.49 [95% CI: 1.43-1.56]). This was still statistically significant after adjusting for age and NIHSS score (OR 1.22 [95% CI: 1.16-1.28]). Neither treatment modality nor OTDT had an additional influence on this association. CONCLUSION: In this large real-world registry, we observed no differences in distribution of treatment modalities between sexes. We did find a minor pre-hospital delay in women and worse functional outcomes in women. The minor delay in OTDT does not fully explain the observed worse outcomes in women. Our results provide reassurance that no major sex biases are apparent in acute stroke management throughout participating Dutch centers.

Safety and efficacy of active blood-pressure reduction to the recommended thresholds for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in the Netherlands (TRUTH): a prospective, observational, cluster-based, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is contraindicated in patients with ischaemic stroke with blood pressure higher than 185/110 mm Hg. Prevailing guidelines recommend to actively lower blood pressure with intravenous antihypertensive agents to allow for thrombolysis; however, there is no robust evidence for this strategy. Because rapid declines in blood pressure can also adversely affect clinical outcomes, several Dutch stroke centres use a conservative strategy that does not involve the reduction of blood pressure. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of both strategies. METHODS: Thrombolysis and Uncontrolled Hypertension (TRUTH) was a prospective, observational, cluster-based, parallel-group study conducted across 37 stroke centres in the Netherlands. Participating centres had to strictly adhere to an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy or to a non-lowering strategy. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with ischaemic stroke who had blood pressure higher than 185/110 mm Hg but were otherwise eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. The primary outcome was functional status at 90 days, measured using the modified Rankin Scale and assessed through telephone interviews by trained research nurses. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, the proportion of patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and door-to-needle time. All ordinal logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, endovascular thrombectomy, and baseline imbalances as fixed-effect variables and centre as a random-effect variable to account for the clustered design. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle, whereby all patients were analysed according to the treatment strategy of the participating centre at which they were treated. FINDINGS: Recruitment began on Jan 1, 2015, and was prematurely halted because of a declining inclusion rate and insufficient funding on Jan 5, 2022. Between these dates, we recruited 853 patients from 27 centres that followed an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy and 199 patients from ten centres that followed a non-lowering strategy. Baseline characteristics of participants from the two groups were similar. The 90-day mRS score was missing for 15 patients. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for a shift towards a worse 90-day functional outcome was 1·27 (95% CI 0·96-1·68) for active blood-pressure reduction compared with no active blood-pressure reduction. 798 (94%) of 853 patients in the active blood-pressure-lowering group were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, with a median door-to-needle time of 35 min (IQR 25-52), compared with 104 (52%) of 199 patients treated in the non-lowering group with a median time of 47 min (29-78). 42 (5%) of 852 patients in the active blood-pressure-lowering group had a symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage compared with six (3%) of 199 of those in the non-lowering group (aOR 1·28 [95% CI 0·62-2·62]). INTERPRETATION: Insufficient evidence was available to establish a difference between an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy-in which antihypertensive agents were administered to reduce blood pressure below 185/110 mm Hg-and a non-lowering strategy for the functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke, despite higher intravenous thrombolysis rates and shorter door-to-needle times among those in the active blood-pressure-lowering group. Randomised controlled trials are needed to inform the use of an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy. FUNDING: Fonds NutsOhra.

Orthostatic hypotension, cognition and structural brain imaging in hemodynamically impaired patients.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with an increased risk of dementia, potentially attributable to cerebral hypoperfusion. We investigated which patterns and characteristics of OH are related to cognition or to potentially underlying structural brain injury in hemodynamically impaired patients and healthy reference participants. METHODS: Participants with carotid occlusive disease or heart failure, and reference participants from the Heart-Brain Connection Study underwent OH measurements, neuropsychological assessment and brain MRI. We analyzed the association between OH, global cognitive functioning, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and brain parenchymal fraction with linear regression. We stratified by participant group, severity and duration of OH, chronotropic incompetence and presence of orthostatic symptoms. RESULTS: Of 337 participants (mean age 67.3 ± 8.8 years, 118 (35.0%) women), 113 (33.5%) had OH. Overall, presence of OH was not associated with cognitive functioning (ß: -0.12 [-0.24-0.00]), but we did observe worse cognitive functioning in those with severe OH (≥ 30/15 mmHg; ß: -0.18 [-0.34 to -0.02]) and clinically manifest OH (ß: -0.30 [-0.52 to -0.08]). These associations did not differ significantly by OH duration or chronotropic incompetence, and were similar between patient groups and reference participants. Similarly, both severe OH and clinically manifest OH were associated with a lower brain parenchymal fraction, and severe OH also with a somewhat higher WMH volume. CONCLUSIONS: Severe OH and clinically manifest OH are associated with worse cognitive functioning. This supports the notion that specific patterns and characteristics of OH determine its impact on brain health.

Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Decline in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases Along the Heart-Brain Axis.

Background: We hypothesize that Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related pathology may accelerate cognitive decline in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To investigate the association between blood-based biomarkers of AD, astrocyte activation, and neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Methods: From the multi-center Heart-Brain study, we included 412 patients with heart failure, carotid occlusive disease or vascular cognitive impairment (age:68.6±9.0) and 128 reference participants (65.7±7.5). Baseline amyloid-ß42/40 (Aß42/40), phosphorylated-tau181 (pTau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NfL) were determined using SiMoA (Quanterix). Memory, attention, language, and executive functioning were evaluated (follow-up:2.1±0.3 years). We applied linear mixed models with terms for biomarker, time and biomarker*time interactions, adjusted for age, sex, education, and site, to assess associations between biomarkers and cognitive decline. Results: Among patients, Aß42/40 was not associated with cognitive performance at baseline. However, lower Aß42/40 was associated with steeper decline in global cognition (ß±SE:0.04±0.02). Higher pTau181 was associated with worse baseline performance on global cognition (-0.14±0.04) and memory (-0.31±0.09) and with steeper decline in global cognition (-0.07±0.02), memory (-0.09±0.04), attention (-0.05±0.02), and language (-0.10±0.03). Higher GFAP was associated with worse baseline performance on global cognition (-0.22±0.05), memory (-0.43±0.10), attention (-0.14±0.06), language (-0.15±0.05), and executive functioning (-0.15±0.05) and steeper decline in global cognition (-0.05±0.01). Higher NfL was associated with worse baseline performance on global cognition (-0.16±0.04), memory (-0.28±0.09), attention (-0.20±0.06), and executive functioning (-0.10±0.04), but was not associated with performance over time. In reference participants, no associations were found. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that blood-based biomarkers of AD-related pathology predict cognitive decline in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

The relation between vascular risk factors and flow in cerebral perforating arteries. A 7 Tesla MRI study.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral perforating arteries provide blood supply to the deep regions of the brain. Recently, it became possible to measure blood flow velocity and pulsatility in these small arteries. It is unknown if vascular risk factors are related to these measures. METHODS: We measured perforating artery flow with 2D phase contrast 7 Tesla MRI at the level of the centrum semiovale (CSO) and the basal ganglia (BG) in seventy participants from the Heart Brain Connection study with carotid occlusive disease (COD), vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), or no actual cerebrovascular disease. Vascular risk factors included hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking. RESULTS: No consistent relations were found between any of the vascular risk factors and either flow velocity or flow pulsatility, although there was a relation between lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure and higher cerebral perforator pulsatility (p=0,045 and p=0,044, respectively) at the BG level. Results were similar in stratified analyses for patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease, or only COD or VCI. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, cross-sectionally, cerebral perforating artery flow velocity and pulsatility are largely independent of the presence of common vascular risk factors in a population with a mixed vascular burden.