"And then you start to loose it because you think about Nutella": The significance of food for people with inflammatory bowel disease - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease strongly believe that food or certain food products heavily influence the symptoms or even trigger acute flare-ups. Unfortunately, there is no generalizable information for these patients, and therefore no effective diet has been identified to date. METHODS: The narrative interviews we used for this study provide the basis for the German website www.krankheitserfahrungen.de . Maximum-variation sampling was used to include a broad range of experiences and a variety of different factors that might influence people's experiences. The sample included men and women of different age groups and social and ethnic backgrounds from across Germany. The interviews were analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Four interrelated categories emerged: managing uncertainty, eating: between craving and aversion, being different and professional help as a further source of uncertainty. The most important issue for our responders was the handling of uncertainty and to find a way between desire for, and aversion against, eating. Many participants described difficulties during formal social occasions such as weddings, birthdays, or when going out to a restaurant. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the experiences the participants reported in their daily struggle with food and their illness, such as cravings for and abstaining from certain foods, were rather unusual and often stressful. Because they decided not to go out in public any longer, some of the interviewees experienced even more social isolation than they did before. Health professionals need to become more involved and not only advice about food and eating, but also help their patients find strategies for avoiding social isolation.

Lack of correlation between Treg quantification assays in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

AIM: To compare the number of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) measured by flow cytometry with those obtained using a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Tregs percentages obtained by both flow cytometry and qPCR methods in 35 adult IBD patients, 18 out of them with Crohn´s disease (CD) and 17 with ulcerative colitis (UC) were compared to each other as well as to scores on two IBD activity questionnaires using the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD patients and the Simple Colitis Clinical Activity Index (SCCAI) for UC patients. The Treg percentages by flow cytometry were defined as CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(low)FOXP3(+) cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, whereas the Treg percentages by qPCR method were determined as FOXP3 promoter demethylation in genomic DNA. RESULTS: We found an average of 1.56% ± 0.78% Tregs by using flow cytometry, compared to 1.07% ± 0.53% Tregs by using qPCR in adult IBD patients. There were no significant correlations between either the percentages of Tregs measured by flow cytometry or qPCR and the HBI or SCCAI questionnaire scores in CD or UC patients, respectively. In addition, there was no correlation between Treg percentages measured by qPCR and those measured by flow cytometry (r = -0.06, P = 0.73; Spearman Rho). These data suggest that, either Treg-related immune function or the clinical scores in these IBD patients did not accurately reflect actual disease activity. Until the cause(s) for these differences are more clearly defined, the results suggest caution in interpreting studies of Tregs in various inflammatory disorders. CONCLUSION: The two methods did not produce equivalent measures of the percentage of total Tregs in the IBD patients studied which is consistent with the conclusion that Tregs subtypes are not equally detected by these two assays.

Loss of Ku70/Ku80 expression occurs more frequently in hereditary than in sporadic colorectal tumors. Tissue microarray study.

Ku70 and Ku80 proteins take part in the repairing of DNA double-strand breaks by their function as a regulatory subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase. In this study, expression of both genes was analyzed in colorectal carcinoma tissue arrays applying immunohistochemistry. Expression of both genes decreased along with pT stage. Significant differences in Ku70 and Ku80 expression were found between pT3 and pT4 as well as between pT2 and pT3 tumors, respectively. Loss of Ku70/Ku80 expression was more frequently observed in hereditary than in sporadic tumors. We conclude that expression of Ku70/Ku80 genes is down-regulated in colorectal carcinoma and that defects of these genes are more frequently observed in hereditary than in sporadic tumors.