Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) are not well-known. OBJECTIVES: This study compared morbidity and mortality among patients with AF and HFpEF treated with CA versus AAT. METHODS: AF and HFpEF patients from January 2017-June 2023 were identified in TriNetX, a large global population-based database. Patients with prior diagnosis of HFrEF or crossover between AAT and CA were excluded. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, type of AF, comorbidities, and cardiovascular medications were compared. The two groups were 1:1 propensity matched for outcomes analysis. All-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and acute HF were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Patients treated with CA (n=1959) and AAT (n=7689) were 1:1 propensity matched yielding 3632 patients with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Compared to AAT, CA was associated with decreased mortality (9.2% vs. 20.5%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.431; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.359 to 0.518; p<0.001). Additionally, CA was associated with reduced HFpEF (HR: 0.638; 95% CI, 0.550 to 0.741; p<0.001) and acute HFrEF (HR: 0.645; 95% CI, 0.452 to 0.920; p=0.015). There was no difference in composite of CVA/TIA (HR: 0.935; 95% CI: 0.725 to 1.207; p=0.607). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of patients with AF and HFpEF, CA was associated with lower mortality and risk of acute heart failure when compared with AAT.

Disparities in the implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death is over 300,000 in the United States (US). Historically, inpatient implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been variable and subject to healthcare disparities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contemporary practice trends of inpatient secondary prevention ICD implants within the US on the basis of race, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 of adult discharges with a primary diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular flutter, and fibrillation (VF). Adjusted ICD implantation rates based on race, sex, and SES and associated temporal trends were calculated using multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 193,600 primary VT/VF discharges in the NIS were included in the cohort, of which 57,895 (29.9%) had ICD placement. There was a significant racial and ethnic disparity in ICD placement for Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American patients as compared to White patients; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.86 [p < .01], 0.90 [p  =  .03], 0.81[p < .01], 0.45 [p < .01], respectively. Female patients were also less likely to receive an ICD compared to male patients (aOR: 0.75, p < .01). Disparities in ICD placement remained stable over the study period (ptrend ≥ .05 in all races, both sexes and income categories). CONCLUSION: Racial, sex, and SES disparities persisted for secondary prevention ICD implants in the US. An investigation into contributing factors and subsequent approaches are needed to address the modifiable causes of disparities in ICD implantation as these trends have not improved compared to historic data.

Case Series and Review of Literature for Superior Vena Cava Injury During Laser Lead Extraction.

Transvenous laser lead extraction poses a risk of major complications (0.19%-1.8%), notably injury to the superior vena cava (SVC) in 0.19% to 0.96% of cases. Various factors contribute to SVC injury, which can be categorized as patient-related (such as female gender, low body mass index, diabetes, renal problems, anemia, and reduced ejection fraction), device-related (including the number, dwell time, and type of leads), or procedural-related (such as reason for extraction, venous obstructions, and bilateral lead placements).

Three-year incidence of pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus node dysfunction receiving ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs.

BACKGROUND: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is commonly seen in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of pacemaker implantation among patients with SND and AF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). METHODS: The 2013-2022 Optum Clinformatics database, an administrative claims database for commercially insured individuals in the United States (US), was used for this study. Patients with AF and SND and a history of at least one AAD prescription were identified and classified into CA or AAD cohorts based on subsequent treatment received. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to balance socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between the cohorts. Weighted Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the differential risk of incident permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Sub-analyses were performed by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent). RESULTS: A total of 1206 patients in the AAD cohort and 1624 patients in the CA cohort were included. Study cohorts were well-balanced post-weighting. The incidence rate of PPM implantation (per 1000 person-year) was 55.8 for the CA cohort and 117.8 for the AAD cohort. Regression analysis demonstrated that the CA cohort had 42% lower risk of incident PPM implantation than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.72, p < 0.001). CA-treated patients had lower risks of PPM implantation versus AAD-treated patients among those with paroxysmal AF (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.69, p < 0.001) and persistent AF (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.81, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF and SND treated with CA have significantly lower risks of incident PPM implantation compared with those treated with an AAD.

Mortality post in-patient catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in rural versus urban areas: Insights from national inpatient sample database.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence is supportive of early atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to maintain sinus rhythm. Disparities in health care between rural and urban areas in the United States are well known. Catheter ablation (CA) of AF is a complex procedure and its outcomes among rural versus urban areas has not been studied in the past. METHODS: The national inpatient sample database 2016-2020 was queried for all hospitalization with the primary diagnosis of AF who underwent AF catheter ablation at the index hospitalization. Then, hospitalizations were stratified into rural versus urban. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs and likelihood for longer length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 78,735 patients underwent inpatient CA of AF between January 2016 and December 2020, mean age was 68.5 ± 11 with 44 % being females. 27,180 (35 %) CA were performed in rural areas, while the remaining CA  51,555 (65 %) were done in urban areas. While, there was very low risk of mortality, patients who underwent CA in rural areas had more comorbidities and also was associated with a 79 % increase in post-procedural in-hospital mortality compared with urban areas (aOR 1.79, 0.8 % vs 0.4 %, CI: 1.15-2.78, P < 0.01). CA of AF in rural areas had a longer length of hospital stay (aOR 1.11, 4.21 vs 3.79 days, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.2, P = 0.02), lower overall cost compared with urban areas (49,698 ± 1251 vs. $53,252 ± 1339, P = 0.03). Multivariate regression analysis showed end stage renal disease and congestive heart failure were independent risk factors associated with increase in post CA in-hospital mortality exceeding two-fold. CONCLUSION: Inpatient CA of AF in rural areas was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay and a lower overall cost when compared with urban areas.

Heart failure risk in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases heart failure (HF) risk. Whereas the risk of HF-related hospitalization and mortality are known in the setting of AF, the impact of AF treatment on HF development is understudied. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare HF incidence among AF patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) vs catheter ablation (CA). Methods: AF patients with 1 prior AAD usage were identified in 2014-2022 Optum Clinformatics database. Patients were classified into 2 cohorts: those receiving CA vs those receiving a different AAD prescription. The 2 cohorts were matched on sociodemographic and clinical covariates using propensity score matching technique. Cox regression model was used to compare incident HF risk in the 2 cohorts. Subgroup analyses were performed by race/ethnicity, sex, AF subtype, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Results: After matching, 9246 patients were identified in each cohort (AAD and CA). Patients receiving CA had a 57% lower risk of incident HF than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.46). Subgroup analysis by race/ethnicity depicted similar results, with non-Hispanic White (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.40-0.46), non-Hispanic Black (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.35-0.60), Hispanic (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.40-0.70), and Asian (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.92) patients treated with CA (vs AAD) having significantly lower risk of HF, respectively. The effect size of CA remained significant in subgroups defined by sex, AF subtypes, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Conclusion: AF patients receiving CA had ∼57% lower risk of developing HF than those receiving AAD. The lower risk of HF associated with CA vs AAD persisted across different race/ethnicity, sex, AF subtypes, and CHA2DS2-VASc score.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Current landscape in US schools for bystander CPR training and AED requirements.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a public health crisis affecting about 356,000 adults and 23,000 children annually in the US with 90% fatality. Early bystander CPR and AED application improve survival. Less than 3% of the US population is CPR trained annually. Since 20% of the US population is at school daily, these represent ideal places to target CPR training. Having standardized state school CPR and AED laws will help with training. METHODS: We performed a systemic search of the state-specific laws for school AED and CPR requirements within the US. We used PubMed and Google search using keywords: school CPR mandates, US laws for CPR in schools, US state laws for AED implementation, and gaps in US school CPR and AED. We searched for mandates for schools in other countries for comparison. RESULTS: The state laws for CPR training for high school graduation and AED requirements in US. schools are highly variable, and funding for AEDs is inadequate, especially in schools in lower socio-economic zip codes. Recent AED legislative efforts focus mainly on athletic areas and don't adequately address school size, number of buildings, non-athletic areas, and engagement of student-led advocacy efforts. CONCLUSION: To improve OHCA survival, we identified potential solutions to consolidate efforts and overcome the barriers-standardize state laws, involve student bodies, increase funding, and allocate appropriate resources. The CPR/AED education needs to start earlier in schools and be part of the standard curriculum rather than implemented as a stopgap check-box mandate.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation in Patients Who Underwent Cardiac Defibrillator Implantation Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis.

The timing of when to perform ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) during the same hospitalization has not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the use and outcomes of VT catheter ablation in patients with sustained VT receiving ICD in the same hospital stay. The Nationwide Readmission Database 2016 to 2019 was queried for all hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of VT with subsequent ICD during the same admission. Hospitalizations were later stratified according to whether a VT ablation was performed. All catheter ablation of VT were performed before ICD implantation. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission. A total of 29,385 VT hospitalizations were included. VT ablation was performed with subsequent ICD placement in 2,255 (7.6%), whereas 27,130 (92.3%) received an ICD only. No differences were found regarding in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 1.9, p = 0.67) and all-cause 90-day readmission rate (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.3, p = 0.16). An increase in readmission because of recurrent VT was noted in the VT ablation group (aOR 1.53, 8% vs 5% CI 1.2 to 1.9, p <0.01); the VT ablation group encompassed a higher number of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (p <0.01), cardiogenic shock (p <0.01), and mechanical circulatory support use (p <0.01). In conclusion, the use of VT ablation in patients admitted with sustained VT is low and reserved for higher risk patients with significant co-morbidities. Despite the higher risk profile of VT ablation cohort, no differences were found in the short-term mortality and readmission rate between the groups.

Outcomes of conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: A multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Whether conduction system pacing (CSP) is an alternative option for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure remains an area of active investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of CSP compared to biventricular pacing (BiVP). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who fulfilled CRT indications and received CSP. Patients with CSP were matched using propensity score matching and compared in a 1:1 ratio to patients who received BiVP. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed. Response to CRT was defined as an absolute increase of ≥5% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months post-CRT. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were included. Mean age was 69.8 ± 12.5 years, and 66 (27.7%) were female. Sixty-nine patients (29%) had His-bundle pacing, 50 (21%) had left bundle branch area pacing, and 119 (50%) had BiVP. Mean follow-up duration in the CSP and BiVP groups was 269 ± 202 days and 304 ± 262 days, respectively (P = .293). The proportion of CRT responders was greater in the CSP group than in the BiVP group (74% vs 60%, respectively; P = .042). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the time to first heart failure hospitalization (log-rank P = .78) and overall survival (log-rank P = .68) between the CSP and BiVP groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, CSP resulted in greater improvement in LVEF compared to BiVP. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to validate these outcomes and further investigate the different options available for CSP.

Low voltage area guided substrate modification in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low voltage areas (LVAs) on left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage mapping correlate with areas of fibrosis. LVAs guided substrate modification was hypothesized to improve the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation particularly in nonparoxysmal AF population. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies yielded mixed results. METHODS: The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Relevant studies comparing LVA guided substrate modification (LVA ablation) versus conventional AF ablation (non LVA ablation) in patients with nonparoxysmal AF were identified and a meta-analysis was performed (Graphical Abstract image). The efficacy endpoints of interest were recurrence of AF and the need for repeat ablation at 1-year. The safety endpoint of interest was adverse events for both groups. Procedure related endpoints included total procedure time and fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies with 1597 patients were included. A significant reduction in AF recurrence at 1-year was observed in LVA ablation versus non LVA ablation group (risk ratio [RR] 0.63 (27% vs. 36%),95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.62, p < .001]. Also, redo ablation was significantly lower in LVA ablation group (RR 0.52[18% vs. 26.7%], 95% CI 0.38-0.69, p < .00133). No difference was found in the overall adverse event (RR 0.7 [4.3% vs. 5.4%], 95% CI 0.36-1.35, p = .29). CONCLUSION: LVA guided substrate modification provides significant reduction in recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias at 1-year compared with non LVA approaches in persistent and longstanding persistent AF population without increase in adverse events.

Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Resource Utilization and In-hospital Outcomes Among Those Admitted for Atrial Fibrillation: A National Analysis.

Disparities in overall outcomes for atrial fibrillation (AF) across racial and ethnic groups have been demonstrated in prior studies. We aim to evaluate in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization across 3 racial/ethnic groups with AF using contemporary data. We identified patients admitted with AF in the National Inpatient Sample registry from 2015 to 2018. ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify variables of interest. The primary outcomes were in-hospital complications and resource utilization. There were 1,250,075 AF admissions. Our sample was made up of 85.49% White, 8.12% Black, and 6.38% Hispanic patients. Black patients were younger but had a higher burden of cardiovascular comorbidities including obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Social determinants were also less favorable in Black patients, with a higher percentage of Medicaid insurance and a high proportion of patients being in the lowest percentile for household income. Total hospital charge was highest in Hispanic patients. Despite higher rates of gastrointestinal bleed, Black patients were least likely to undergo left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation. Black and Hispanic patients were less like to undergo catheter ablation therapy. Black race was an independent predictor of mortality, stroke, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic shock, need for vasopressor, upper gastrointestinal bleed, need for blood transfusion, total hospital charges, and length of stay when compared to other groups. Disparities exist in the risk of AF, and its management among racial and ethnic groups. Health care costs and inpatient outcomes disproportionately impact minorities in the United States.

Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has not been assessed. Methods and Results We used pooled electronic health data to perform retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 66,  595 patients with AF and sick sinus syndrome to assess the need of PPM implantation temporally, with AF performed divided into earlier within 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), or beyond 10 years (group 3) of diagnosis. PPM implantation was lowest among those who had catheter ablation within 5 years of sick sinus syndrome diagnosis: group 1 versus group 2 (18.15% versus 27.21%) and group 1 versus group 3 (18.15% versus 27.22%). Interestingly, there was no difference in risk of PPM between group 2 and group 3 (27.21% versus 27.22%; odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85-1.20]). Conclusions Even after controlling known risk factors that increase the need for pacemaker implantation, timing of AF ablation was the strongest predictor for need for PPM. Patients adjusted OR of PPM was lower if patients had catheter ablation within 5 years of diagnosis compared with later than 5 years (adjusted OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.70]).

Gender, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in access to catheter ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: Female patients, patients from racial minorities, and patient with low socioeconomic status have been noted to have less access to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study using a large population database (Explorys) to evaluate the gender, racial and socioeconomic differences in access of catheter ablation therapy in patient with atrial fibrillation. Results: A total of 2.2 million patients were identified as having atrial fibrillation and 62,760 underwent ablation. Females had ablation in 2.1% of cases while males received ablation in 3.4% of cases. Caucasians had ablation in 3.3% of cases, African Americans in 1.5% of cases and other minorities in 1.2% of cases. Individuals on medicaid underwent ablation in 1.6% of cases, individuals on medicare and private insurance had higher rates (2.8 and 2.9%, respectively). Logistic regression showed that female patients (OR 0.608, CI 0.597-0.618, p < 0.0001), patients who are African American (OR 0.483, CI 0.465-0.502, p < 0.0001), or from other racial minorities (OR 0.343, CI 0.332-0.355, p < 0.0001) were less likely to undergo ablation. Patient with medicare (OR 1.444, CI 1.37-1.522, p < 0.0001) and private insurance (OR 1.572, CI 1.491-1.658, p < 0.0001) were more likely to undergo ablation. Conclusion: Female gender, racial minorities, low socioeconomic status are all associated with lower rates of catheter ablation in management of atrial fibrillation.

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest within the United States: Now is the time for change.

This review highlights the current evidence on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in cardiac arrest outcomes within the United States. Several studies demonstrate that patients from Black, Hispanic, or lower socioeconomic status backgrounds suffer the most from disparities at multiple levels of the resuscitation pathway, including in the provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator usage, and postresuscitation therapies. These gaps in care may altogether lead to lower survival rates and worse neurological outcomes for these patients. A multisystem, culturally sensitive approach to improving cardiac arrest outcomes is suggested in this article.

Lessons Learned During the Pandemic: Correlation of QT Intervals Between Telemetry and 12-Lead Electrocardiogram.

Background and objective QT prolongation is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Since some patients on contact or droplet precautions require QT-prolonging medications, monitoring the QT interval may become imperative to prevent fatal arrhythmias. To limit the exposure of staff to patients during and even after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and judiciously use personal protective equipment (PPE), it is important to find alternatives to frequent 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG). The objective of this study was to compare QT intervals measured on telemetry to those measured on 12-lead ECG to determine whether telemetry QT interval measurements could be used in place of 12-lead measurements. Methods Simultaneous telemetry recordings via a Philips telemetry monitoring system (Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, Netherlands) and 12-lead ECGs were obtained from 50 patients. Patients were from cardiac telemetry and cardiac intensive care units. QT interval from the telemetry system was compared to the QT interval on the 12-lead ECG. QT intervals on two telemetry strips were uninterpretable as the termination of the T-wave could not be defined appropriately; therefore, these patients were excluded. Results In 33 of 48 patients (69%), QT intervals from the telemetry studies matched the QT intervals measured by 12-lead ECG. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between telemetry QT and 12-lead ECG QT was 0.887 (95% CI: 0.809-0.934; p<0.001). In 15 of 48 patients (31%), the QT intervals measured from telemetry were different from those measured by 12-lead ECG. These patients either had an abnormal rhythm, conduction abnormalities, or repolarization abnormalities at baseline. Conclusion Telemetry is a suitable alternative for measuring QT intervals in the majority of patients. However, those with baseline ECG abnormalities should have serial 12-lead ECGs. This can reduce the risk of staff exposure to pathogens and prevent overuse of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic and for other patients in isolation.

The Spiked Helmet Sign: A Concerning Electrocardiographic Finding.

We present the case of an 18-year-old man, with a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, who is found to have the spiked helmet sign on electrocardiogram during a hospital admission for severe respiratory infection. The spiked helmet sign is a poorly understood electrocardiographic finding that mimics other electrocardiographic pathologies, and is associated with critical illness and high mortality. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).