Genetic testing for unexplained epilepsy: A review of diagnostic approach, benefits, and referral algorithm.

In the last several decades, advances in genetic testing have transformed the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pediatric epilepsy. However, the interpretation of these genetic tests often requires expert analysis and counseling. For this reason, as our molecular understanding of the linkages between abnormal cerebral physiology and genetics has grown, so too has the field of clinical epilepsy genetics. Here we explore recent advances in genetic testing, describe the benefits of genetic testing in epilepsy, and provide a practice guideline for testing and referrals to specialized epilepsy genetics centers, highlighting the Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN) Clinic and the Center for Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ENDD) at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia as an illustration of such a specialized center.

Pediatric Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis and Risk for Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) is a rare form of pediatric stroke with significant morbidity. We determined cumulative incidence and predictors of acute seizures, remote seizures, and epilepsy after pediatric CSVT. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 131 neonates and children with neuroimaging-confirmed CSVT enrolled between 2008 and 2020 from a single-center prospective consecutive cohort. Acute seizures occurred within 7 days of CSVT. Remote seizures occurred >7 days after CSVT. Epilepsy was defined as 2 or more remote seizures at least 24 hours apart. Survival methods determined the incidence of and risk factors for remote seizures and epilepsy. RESULTS: Acute seizures occurred in 14/33 neonates (42%) and 19/98 children (19%). Among children, hemorrhage predicted acute seizures (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.9 to 22.4, P = 0.003). Remote seizures occurred in six neonates; five developed epilepsy. Remote seizures occurred in 14 children; 10 developed epilepsy. In neonates, 1- and 3-year epilepsy-free survival were 86% (95% CI 62% to 95%) and 66% (95% CI 32% to 87%). One- and 3-year epilepsy-free survival in children were 88% (95% CI 76% to 92%) and 84% (95% CI 59% to 86%). In multivariable analysis for children, acute seizures predicted epilepsy (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1-13.3, P = 0.039). In both cohorts, Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure scores at last follow-up were worse in those with epilepsy compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: Acute seizures occurred in approximately one quarter of our cohort and are an epilepsy risk factor in children with CSVT. Neonates and children with epilepsy had worse outcomes than those without.

Investigating the genetic contribution in febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome and refractory status epilepticus.

Introduction: Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a severe childhood epilepsy with refractory status epilepticus after a typically mild febrile infection. The etiology of FIRES is largely unknown, and outcomes in most individuals with FIRES are poor. Methods: Here, we reviewed the current state-of-the art genetic testing strategies in individuals with FIRES. We performed a systematic computational analysis to identify individuals with FIRES and characterize the clinical landscape using the Electronic Medical Records (EMR). Among 25 individuals with a confirmed FIRES diagnosis over the last decade, we performed a comprehensive review of genetic testing and other diagnostic testing. Results: Management included use of steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in most individuals, with an increased use of immunomodulatory agents, including IVIG, plasma exchange (PLEX) and immunosuppressants such as cytokine inhibitors, and the ketogenic diet after 2014. Genetic testing was performed on a clinical basis in almost all individuals and was non-diagnostic in all patients. We compared FIRES with both status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE) as a broader comparison cohort and identified genetic causes in 36% of patients with RSE. The difference in genetic signatures between FIRES and RSE suggest distinct underlying etiologies. In summary, despite the absence of any identifiable etiologies in FIRES, we performed an unbiased analysis of the clinical landscape, identifying a heterogeneous range of treatment strategies and characterized real-world clinical practice. Discussion: FIRES remains one of the most enigmatic conditions in child neurology without any known etiologies to date despite significant efforts in the field, suggesting a clear need for further studies and novel diagnostic and treatment approaches.