Undue burden: Black faculty, COVID-19, and the racial justice movement.

A crucial reckoning was initiated when the COVID-19 pandemic began to expose and intensify long-standing racial/ethnic health inequities, all while various sectors of society pursued racial justice reform. As a result, there has been a contextual shift towards broader recognition of systemic racism, and not race, as the shared foundational driver of both societal maladies. This confluence of issues is of particular relevance to Black populations disproportionately affected by the pandemic and racial injustice. In response, institutions have initiated diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts as a way forward. This article considers how the dual pandemic climate of COVID-19-related health inequities and the racial justice movement could exacerbate the "time and effort tax" on Black faculty to engage in DEI efforts in academia and biomedicine. We discuss the impact of this "tax" on career advancement and well-being, and introduce an operational framework for considering the interconnected influence of systemic racism, the dual pandemics, and DEI work on the experience of Black faculty. If not meaningfully addressed, the "time and effort tax" could contribute to Black and other underrepresented minority faculty leaving academia and biomedicine - consequently, the very diversity, equity, and inclusion work meant to increase representation could decrease it.

COVID-19 in patients with and without cancer: Examining differences in patient characteristics and outcomes.

This study examines differences between patients with and without cancer in patient demographic and clinical characteristics and COVID-19 mortality and discusses the implications of these differences in relation to existing cancer disparities and COVID-19 vulnerabilities. Data was collected as a part of a retrospective study on a cohort of COVID-19 positive patients across Mount Sinai Health System from March 28, 2020 to April 26, 2020. Descriptive, comparative, and regression analyses were applied to examine differences between patients with and without cancer in demographic and clinical characteristics and COVID-19 mortality and whether cancer status predicts COVID-19 mortality controlling for these covariates using SAS 9.4. Results showed that, of 4641 patients who tested positive for COVID-19, 5.1% (N=236) had cancer. The median age of the total sample was 58 years (Q1-Q3: 41-71); 55.3% were male, 19.2% were current/former smokers, 6.1% were obese. The most commonly reported comorbidities were hypertension (22.6%) and diabetes (16.0%). Overall, the COVID-19 mortality rate was 8.3%. Examining differences between COVID-19 patients with and without cancer revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in COVID-19 mortality, hospitalization rates, age, gender, race, smoking status, obesity, and comorbidity indicators (e.g., diabetes) with cancer patients more likely to be older, male, black, obese, smokers, and with existing comorbidities. Controlling for these clinical, demographic, and behavioral characteristics, results of logistic regression analyses showed significant effects of older age and male gender on COVID-19 mortality (p<0.05). While cancer patients with COVID-19 were more likely to experience worse COVID-19 outcomes, these associations might be related to common cancer and COVID-19 vulnerability factors such as older age and gender. The coexistence of these vulnerability age and gender factors in both cancer and COVID-19 populations emphasizes the need for better understanding of their implications for cancer and COVID-19 disparities, both diseases prevention efforts, policies, and clinical management.

Dealing With the Unthinkable: Bladder and Colorectal Cancer Patients' and Informal Caregivers' Unmet Needs and Challenges in Life After Ostomies.

OBJECTIVES: We examined patient and informal caregiver unmet needs to identify areas for targeted supportive care interventions and programs to enhance both patient and informal caregiver experience. DATA SOURCES: A total of 30 patients who underwent ostomy surgeries for bladder or colorectal cancers and 13 informal caregivers participated in the study. Patients were enrolled at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai between 2017 and 2018. Qualitative data were collected by individual interviews, audiotaped, and transcribed verbatim. Transcribed data were iteratively analyzed using Atlas.ti to explore patient and caregiver unmet needs. RESULTS: Patients and informal caregivers reported having insufficient psychological preparation for ostomy surgeries, and very limited hands-on training on stoma care and utility of stomal appliances. Unmet psychological needs related to depression, anxiety, and distress caused by changes in body image and sexual, urinary, and bowel function were reported. Patients and caregivers also reported significant patient medical needs in the acute postoperative period including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, inflammation, and complications resulting in hospital readmissions. Colorectal cancer patients specifically experienced significant challenges with changes in diet and nutrition that contributed to ostomy care burden. Both patients and caregivers recommended seeking psychological and social support to enhance both patient and caregiver emotional adjustment to life after ostomies. CONCLUSION: Meeting patient and informal caregiver unmet informational and supportive care needs is imperative to improve their quality of life and adjustment. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: An effective supportive care plan should be designed and utilized in clinical care to improve ostomy patients' and caregivers' outcomes.

Identifying Distinct High Unmet-Need Phenotypes and Their Associated Bladder Cancer Patient Demographic, Clinical, Psychosocial, and Functional Characteristics: Results of Two Clustering Methods.

OBJECTIVES: We explored phenotypes of high unmet need of patients with bladder cancer and their associated patient demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and functional characteristics. DATA SOURCES: Patients (N=159) were recruited from the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network and completed an online survey measuring unmet needs (BCNAS-32), quality of life (FACT-Bl), anxiety and depression (HADS), coping (BRIEF Cope), social support (SPS), and self-efficacy beliefs (GSE). Hierarchical agglomerative (HA) and partitioning clustering (PC) analyses were used to identify and confirm high unmet-need phenotypes and their associated patient characteristics. Results showed a two-cluster solution; a cluster of patients with high unmet needs (17% and 34%, respectively) and a cluster of patients with low-moderate unmet needs (83% and 66%, respectively). These two methods showed moderate agreement (κ=0.57) and no significant differences in patient demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. However, the high-need group identified by the HA clustering method had significantly higher psychological (81 vs 66, p < .05), health system (93 vs 74, p < .001), daily living (93 vs 74, P < .001), sexuality (97 vs 69, P < .001), logistics (84 vs 69, P < .001), and communication (90 vs 76, P < .001) needs. This group also had worse quality of life and emotional adjustment and lower personal and social resources (P < .001) compared with the group identified by the PC method. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with bladder cancer continues to have high unique but inter-related phenotypes of needs based on the HA clustering method. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Identifying characteristics of the most vulnerable patients will help tailor support programs to assist these patients with their unmet needs.