Normothermic machine perfusion of kidneys: current strategies and future perspectives.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the latest original preclinical and clinical articles in the setting of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of kidney grafts. RECENT FINDINGS: Kidney NMP can be safely translated into the clinical routine and there is increasing evidence that NMP may be beneficial in graft preservation especially in marginal kidney grafts. Due to the near-physiological state during NMP, this technology may be used as an ex-vivo organ assessment and treatment platform. There are reports on the application of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells, multipotent adult progenitor cells and microRNA during kidney NMP, with first data indicating that these therapies indeed lead to a decrease in inflammatory response and kidney injury. Together with the demonstrated possibility of prolonged ex-vivo perfusion without significant graft damage, NMP could not only be used as a tool to perform preimplant graft assessment. Some evidence exists that it truly has the potential to be a platform to treat and repair injured kidney grafts, thereby significantly reducing the number of declined organs. SUMMARY: Kidney NMP is feasible and can potentially increase the donor pool not only by preimplant graft assessment, but also by ex-vivo graft treatment.

Prolonged Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion Is Superior to Cold Nonoxygenated and Oxygenated Machine Perfusion for the Preservation of DCD Porcine Kidney Grafts.

The increased usage of marginal grafts has triggered interest in perfused kidney preservation to minimize graft injury. We used a donation after circulatory death (DCD) porcine kidney autotransplantation model to compare 3 of the most frequently used ex vivo kidney perfusion techniques: nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (non-oxHMP), oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (oxHMP), and normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP). METHODS: Following 30 min of warm ischemia, grafts were retrieved and preserved with either 16 h of non-oxHMP, oxHMP, or NEVKP (n = 5 per group). After contralateral nephrectomy, grafts were autotransplanted and animals were followed for 8 d. Kidney function and injury markers were compared between groups. RESULTS: NEVKP demonstrated a significant reduction in preservation injury compared with either cold preservation method. Grafts preserved by NEVKP showed superior function with lower peak serum creatinine (NEVKP versus non-oxHMP versus oxHMP: 3.66 ± 1.33 mg/dL, 8.82 ± 3.17 mg/dL, and 9.02 ± 5.5 mg/dL) and more rapid recovery. The NEVKP group demonstrated significantly increased creatinine clearance on postoperative day 3 compared with the cold perfused groups. Tubular injury scores on postoperative day 8 were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of oxygen during HMP did not reduce preservation injury of DCD kidney grafts. Grafts preserved with prolonged NEVKP demonstrated superior initial graft function compared with grafts preserved with non-oxHMP or oxHMP in a model of pig DCD kidney transplantation.