Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Food Microbiol ; 27(2): 311-5, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20141951

RESUMO

In order to compare human and retail poultry meat thermophilic Campylobacter isolates originating in a regional area in Western Finland, minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) for six antimicrobials (96 isolates) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (102 isolates) were analysed. Campylobacter spp. were detected in 10.5% out of 305 fresh poultry products studied; 29 (90.5%) isolates were identified as Campylobacter jejuni. Among the 70 human isolates, 66 (94.3%) isolates were identified as C. jejuni. Only one C. jejuni domestic poultry isolate showed resistance (ampicillin), whereas domestic human C. jejuni isolates were more commonly resistant to ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, ampicillin and tetracycline. The resistance in foreign human isolates was significantly more common than among domestic isolates. PFGE analysis with KpnI restriction enzyme resulted in 59 different PFGE types among the poultry and human isolates. Three types were detected first in poultry meat and thereafter during the following month in domestic human samples, whereas the other conjoint types were detected only after many months. This study suggests that poultry products play only a minor role in human campylobacteriosis in the study area and that the resistance found in domestic human isolates is not likely related to retail poultry meat products.


Assuntos
Infecções por Campylobacter/etiologia , Campylobacter jejuni/isolamento & purificação , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/microbiologia , Produtos da Carne/microbiologia , Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Animais , Infecções por Campylobacter/microbiologia , Campylobacter jejuni/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Fezes/microbiologia , Finlândia , Humanos
2.
Acta Vet Scand ; 51: 18, 2009 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19348687

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial enteritis worldwide. Handling and eating of contaminated poultry meat has considered as one of the risk factors for human campylobacteriosis. Campylobacter contamination can occur at all stages of a poultry production cycle. The objective of this study was to determine the occurrence of Campylobacter during a complete turkey production cycle which lasts for 1,5 years of time. For detection of Campylobacter, a conventional culture method was compared with a PCR method. Campylobacter isolates from different types of samples have been identified to the species level by a multiplex PCR assay. METHODS: Samples (N = 456) were regularly collected from one turkey parent flock, the hatchery, six different commercial turkey farms and from 11 different stages at the slaughterhouse. For the detection of Campylobacter, a conventional culture and a PCR method were used. Campylobacter isolates (n = 143) were identified to species level by a multiplex PCR assay. RESULTS: No Campylobacter were detected in either the samples from the turkey parent flock or from hatchery samples using the culture method. PCR detected Campylobacter DNA in five faecal samples and one fluff and eggshell sample. Six flocks out of 12 commercial turkey flocks where found negative at the farm level but only two were negative at the slaughterhouse. CONCLUSION: During the brooding period Campylobacter might have contact with the birds without spreading of the contamination within the flock. Contamination of working surfaces and equipment during slaughter of a Campylobacter positive turkey flock can persist and lead to possible contamination of negative flocks even after the end of the day's cleaning and desinfection. Reduction of contamination at farm by a high level of biosecurity control and hygiene may be one of the most efficient ways to reduce the amount of contaminated poultry meat in Finland. Due to the low numbers of Campylobacter in the Finnish turkey production chain, enrichment PCR seems to be the optimal detection method here.


Assuntos
Infecções por Campylobacter/veterinária , Campylobacter/isolamento & purificação , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Perus , Animais , Campylobacter/genética , Infecções por Campylobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Campylobacter/microbiologia , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia
3.
Food Microbiol ; 25(7): 908-14, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18721681

RESUMO

During a period of 9 months, 194 marinated and non-marinated poultry products were collected from retail shops in a defined area in Western Finland and tested for Campylobacter spp. using a conventional enrichment culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method. For marinated poultry products, the study involved modification of a commercial DNA isolation method. Using either a conventional culture or PCR method, a total of 25 (12.9%) of all investigated samples were Campylobacter positive. In marinated poultry products, Campylobacter was detected at a prevalence of 21.1% and 9.5% in turkey and chicken products, respectively. In August, there was a peak with 28.9% positive Campylobacter samples. Campylobacter inoculation tests were carried out to test the detection limit of both methods. The PCR method used is faster than microbiological analyses. However, enrichment of the samples is necessary due to the low occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in retail Finnish poultry products.


Assuntos
Campylobacter/isolamento & purificação , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Produtos Avícolas/microbiologia , Animais , Galinhas , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Perus
4.
J Food Prot ; 69(6): 1443-7, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16786871

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to find sources of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in fish products from a fish farm. The occurrence of L. monocytogenes also was compared in two freshwater fish farms with different types of fishponds. Samples collected from chilled rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the slaughterhouse environment did not contain L. monocytogenes, but Listeria innocua was found in two samples from the slaughterhouses. Ten isolates of L. monocytogenes were discovered in sediment and water samples from farming tanks and earth ponds. Further characterization by serovar revealed the same serovar (1/2a) for all the isolates. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to divide the isolates into five different pulsotypes, three of which have been identified previously in fish products on the retail market. This finding supports the assumption that the primary production, and probably the raw fish, is a source of Listeria contamination in fish products. Some of the isolates were associated with a certain type of fishpond, indicating the need for hygienic analysis of the suitability of different types of farming ponds.


Assuntos
Matadouros , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Pesqueiros/normas , Listeria/isolamento & purificação , Oncorhynchus mykiss/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Animais , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/prevenção & controle , Sedimentos Geológicos/microbiologia , Humanos , Higiene , Listeria/classificação , Listeria monocytogenes/classificação , Listeria monocytogenes/isolamento & purificação , Sorotipagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA