RESUMO
Temporal patterns of acetaminophen use exceeding the recommended daily maximum dosage of 4 g over a 5-year period (4/1/2011-3/31/2016) were evaluated in an online 1-week diary study of 14 434 adult acetaminophen users who also reported acetaminophen use in the previous month. Specific medications taken were identified by list-based prompting; respondents were not required to know their medications contained acetaminophen. Details of use were recorded daily; total daily dosage was determined programmatically. Prevalence of >4 g use over time was modelled and tested for linear changes. The overall prevalence of >4 g use (6.3% of users and 3.7% of usage days) did not change over the 5 years: odds ratio (OR) persons, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98-1.09); OR days, 0.98 (0.92-1.05). Deviations from label directions were largely unchanged, though concomitant use increased slightly. Thus, over a recent 5-year period, there was no evidence of change in how often acetaminophen use exceeded the labelled maximum daily dose.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Dados de Saúde Gerados pelo Paciente/tendências , Adulto , Diários como Assunto , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dados de Saúde Gerados pelo Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether there are differences in the likelihood of exceeding the daily limit of 4 grams of acetaminophen when using different formulations (325 mg, 500 mg, 650 mg) of OTC single-ingredient (SI) acetaminophen medications. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multiyear observational study of acetaminophen use via daily online acetaminophen-usage diaries completed for 7 days. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7579 U.S. adults from online research panels who used acetaminophen in the month preceding enrollment and used an OTC SI acetaminophen medication during the study. OUTCOME MEASURE: Exceeding the daily dose. RESULTS: On days when 325-mg or 500-mg OTC SI formulations were taken, users were not significantly more likely to exceed 4 grams than on days when OTC SI formulations were not used. On days when 650-mg extended-release (ER) formulations were taken, exceeding 4 grams was significantly more likely (8.9% of days vs. 4.4%; P < 0.0001; median on those days was 5.2 g) than on days with 325- or 500-mg OTC SI formulations. Users of 650-mg ER formulations were significantly less likely to know their dosing interval of 8 hours (33% vs. 49%; P < 0.0001) and more likely to redose too soon (26% vs. 10%; P < 0.0001) and to use other acetaminophen medications concomitantly (14% vs. 7%; P < 0.0001). These patterns were strongest among 650-mg ER products that did not include "8-Hour" in the product name. CONCLUSION: Usage of 500-mg OTC SI acetaminophen formulations does not contribute differently to exceeding dosage compared with other OTC SI acetaminophen formulations. Exceeding 4 grams is more likely when 650-mg ER formulations are used. Improved consumer information on the packages and counseling from pharmacists may help to reduce practices that contribute to exceeding the labeled daily limit of these medications.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Users should know the active ingredients and dosing directions to optimize the safe use of acetaminophen-containing medications. The aim of this work was to examine knowledge of acetaminophen-containing medication directions among current users. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An Internet panel diary study (2012-2016) of 1-week usage of acetaminophen medications (over-the-counter [OTC] and prescription), recorded daily; 9629 participants. Users were asked about ingredients of medications taken; specific dosing instructions were asked for each OTC medication taken. Subjects were considered to be correct only if an accurate response was provided for all of the medications they used. OUTCOME MEASURES: Analyses examined prevalence of several aspects of knowledge and their relation to the corresponding deviations from directions. Knowledge that acetaminophen was an ingredient was compared between medication types. RESULTS: Two-thirds of 5161 participants who used only 1 acetaminophen medication knew the ingredient; the proportion was almost halved in 4468 users of 2 or more. Ingredient knowledge was highest for single-ingredient medications (74%); for combination medications it ranged from 39% (cough or cold) to 61% (sleep or other non-pain). About one-third knew the prohibition against concomitant use of multiple acetaminophen medications; 85% knew the maximum one-time OTC dose, but only 47% knew the minimum interval between doses. Correct knowledge was inversely associated with violating the relevant label directions; in particular, knowing the one-time dose decreased the odds of taking too much at one time fivefold. Knowing both the ingredient and the concomitant use prohibition decreased the odds of concomitant use by 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of directions for safe use of acetaminophen-containing medications is poor, and its deficiency is associated with corresponding deviations from label instructions. This study demonstrates a need for education about safe use of acetaminophen-containing medications, particularly for combination products.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Combinação de Medicamentos , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagemRESUMO
AIMS: To estimate prevalence of excess intake of paracetamol and investigate seasonal variations therein. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, 14 481 US adults who used paracetamol in the preceding 30 days were sampled from national online panels and completed a detailed online daily diary of paracetamol medication use for 7 days. Respondents were not told that the study concerned paracetamol. Cold/flu season (CFS), identified using Google Trends data, was contrasted to off-season in symptoms, use of paracetamol medications, and consumption exceeding 4 g (the recommended daily maximum). RESULTS: Overall, 6.3% [95% confidence interval: 5.9-6.7%] of users exceeded 4 g on at least one day; 3.7% [3.5-3.8%] of usage days exceeded 4 g. Cold/flu symptoms were more likely to be experienced and treated with paracetamol in CFS than off-season. Paracetamol users were more likely to exceed 4 g during CFS (6.5% vs. 5.3%; odds ratio = 1.24, 1.04-1.48); days exceeding 4 g also increased (3.9% vs. 2.8%; odds ratio = 1.37, 1.11-1.69). This was not due to differences in characteristics of individuals using paracetamol in CFS, but primarily to increased use of over-the-counter combination medications designed to treat upper respiratory cold/flu symptoms (33.2% of usage days in CFS vs. 24.8% in off-season; odds ratio = 1.58, 1.46-1.72). When such medications were omitted, there was no statistically significant seasonal variation in exceeding 4 g. CONCLUSIONS: Paracetamol use and over-dosing increases in CFS, primarily due to increased use of over-the-counter combinations treating upper respiratory cold/flu symptoms. Pharmacists should warn users to follow labelled dosing directions, especially during CFS.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Estações do Ano , Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Resfriado Comum/diagnóstico , Resfriado Comum/epidemiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Humanos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective and very commonly used, but also have side effects. We determined prevalence of NSAID dosing exceeding the daily limit (EDL) and identified related user characteristics and dosing patterns among current ibuprofen users. METHODS: Online 1-week diary study of 1326 ibuprofen users. NSAIDs were identified by list-based prompting; respondents were not required to know their medications were NSAIDs. Details of hourly use were recorded by respondents daily. Deviations from dosing directions were programmatically determined afterwards. An exit survey obtained information on demographics, medical history, physical and mental health status, attitudes regarding label reading and dosing behavior, and knowledge of product label instructions. RESULTS: Most diary users (90%) took over-the-counter ibuprofen during the week; 37% also took non-ibuprofen NSAIDs. Most did not recognize all products taken as NSAIDs. EDL occurred among 11% of users for ibuprofen, 4% of users for other NSAIDs, and on 9.1% of NSAID usage days. EDL was associated with deviations from detailed dosing directions, particularly exceeding the 1-time dose, which occurred more often with medications with 1-pill doses. Personal characteristics associated with EDL included male sex, ongoing pain, poor physical function, daily smoking, having the attitudes of "choosing my own dose" and not starting with the lowest dose, and poor knowledge of the recommended 1-time and 24-hour doses. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of EDL among NSAID users is nontrivial, and it is associated with potentially modifiable factors. Educating consumers about NSAIDs and their dosing directions could reduce excess dosing.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We sought to compare mortality rates and related diagnoses in hospitalized patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), those with diabetes mellitus (DM), and the general hospitalized population (GHP). METHODS: Patients who died between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the US hospital-based Premier Healthcare Database. Demographic information was collected, mortality rates calculated, and principal diagnoses categorized. RESULTS: Of 55,152 unique patients with MS identified, 1518 died. Mean age at death was 10 years younger for the MS group (63.4 years) than for the DM (73.3 years) and GHP (73.1 years) groups. Age-adjusted mortality rates, based on the 2000 US Standard Million Population, were 1077, 1248, and 1133 per 100,000, respectively. Infection was the most common principal diagnosis at the hospital stay during which the patient died in the MS cohort (43.1% vs. 26.3% and 24.0% in the DM and GHP groups, respectively). Other common principal diagnoses in the MS group included pulmonary (17.5%) and cardiovascular (12.1%) disease. Septicemia/sepsis/septic shock was a secondary diagnosis for 50.7% of patients with MS versus 36.0% and 31.0% of patients in the DM and GHP cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS had a shorter life span than patients with DM or the GHP and were more likely to have a principal diagnosis of infection at their final hospital stay. However, the database was limited to codes recorded in the hospital; diagnoses received outside the hospital were not captured.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acetaminophen is a commonly used analgesic/antipyretic; overdoses can lead to liver damage. Little is known about the relationship of health literacy to exceeding the recommended maximum daily dose (4 g). METHODS: Subjects were recruited at 23 U.S. malls in 2011. Health literacy was measured by Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), classified as very low (VLL, score <45); low (LL, 45-60); or adequate (AL, >60). Participants completed a 7-day acetaminophen use diary by daily telephone interview; an exit interview covered demographics, physical/mental health, medical history, medication label reading, and medication-taking knowledge/attitudes. Acetaminophen products were identified from a comprehensive list; subjects were not required to know their medications contained acetaminophen. Seven hundred fifty-six subjects aged ≥18 years had taken acetaminophen in the past 30 days and completed 7 diary days with ≥1 day of acetaminophen use, plus the exit survey. Analysis was conducted in 2012-2014. RESULTS: VLL were more likely than AL individuals to exceed 4 g on ≥1 day (OR [95% CI]=3.8 [1.5, 9.6]; 4.0 [1.3, 12] after controlling for five REALM score-related factors). On usage days, VLL individuals were also more likely to exceed 4 g (3.3 [1.1, 10], by generalized estimating equations; 2.4 [0.9, 6.6], direct effect after accounting for mediation by other deviations from label recommendations). CONCLUSIONS: VLL individuals exceed the recommended maximum acetaminophen dose more often than AL individuals. Other identified characteristics related to health literacy do not explain this, but it is partly mediated by increased frequency of other label deviations.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Rotulagem de Medicamentos/normas , Overdose de Drogas , Letramento em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acetaminofen/intoxicação , Adulto , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen overuse has been linked to liver injury. PURPOSE: To identify patterns of medication use associated with exceeding the recommended daily maximum dose of 4 g acetaminophen. METHODS: Respondents from a national panel completed a detailed daily medication diary online for 7 days (n = 5649), identifying medications taken from a comprehensive list of over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription (Rx) acetaminophen medications. Respondents were not told the study concerned acetaminophen. Total daily intake was calculated from diary data. Generalized estimating equations assessed the association of medication patterns with exceeding 4 g per day among 3618 respondents who used acetaminophen medications (on 13,852 days) during the diary period. RESULTS: Acetaminophen intake exceeded 4 g on 3.1% of usage days; median intake on those days was 5.5 g. As expected, days when intake exceeded 4 g were almost always (92%) marked by deviations from label directions-exceeding the one-time dose, re-dosing too soon, and concomitant use of multiple acetaminophen medications. Re-dosing too soon was the most frequent deviation, and concomitant use was most strongly tied to exceeding the daily limit. Use of both an Rx and an OTC medication on the same day also increased the odds of exceeding 4 g on days when concomitant use occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Excess dosing of acetaminophen is associated with deviations from label directions and by use of both OTC and Rx medications containing acetaminophen within a single concomitant use day.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Internet , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Acetaminophen is a commonly used analgesic; excessive doses can lead to liver damage. We sought to determine the proportion of acetaminophen users exceeding the recommended maximum daily dose of 4 g and identify correlates of such behavior. METHODS: U.S. adults were recruited from an internet panel in summer 2010, oversampling past 30-day acetaminophen users. Among 47 738 starting the study, 5649 completed all phases; individuals with low education were underrepresented. Subjects completed a 7-day daily diary online, reporting intake of acetaminophen products selected from a comprehensive list; total daily dose was computed from product names. An exit survey elicited: attitudes/knowledge related to product ingredients, label reading, dosing behavior; demographics, medical history, general physical, and mental health status. Unconditional logistic regression identified variables independently associated with use exceeding 4 g. RESULTS: Among 3618 acetaminophen users, 163 took >4 g on ≥1 day (4.5%); the median dose was 5.5 g; 26 took >8 g (0.7%). >4-g users were characterized by chronic pain, poor physical status, and heavy use of medical care. Knowledge of ingredients and recommended OTC doses for all products taken was inversely associated with >4-g use (multivariable odds ratios [ORs] = 0.5-0.6), as was the attitude to start with the lowest dose (OR = 0.6). The attitude that users could choose their own dose was positively associated (OR = 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results estimate the proportion of acetaminophen users exceeding 4 g in a group of U.S. adults, identify potentially modifiable attitudes and knowledge associated with such use, and characterize subpopulations at higher risk.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Acetaminofen/intoxicação , Adulto , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Internet , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Study Type - Prevalence (inception cohort) Level of Evidence 1b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Certain antihypertensives, particularly diuretics and calcium channel blockers, are known to be associated with increased risk of LUTS including nocturia, but little is known about gender-specific effects. This is the first epidemiological study, to our knowledge, to compare the prevalence of several urological symptoms (storage, voiding and nocturia) among male and female users of a wide variety of common antihypertensives using a community-based sample. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) among users of five common AHT classes compared with non-users, adjusted for LUTS risk factors in a large, representative sample. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were from the Boston Area Community Health Survey, a population-based study of community-dwelling male and female (30-79 years) residents of Boston, MA, USA for whom prescription drug information was collected between 2002 and 2005. The urological symptoms of storage, voiding, and nocturia were assessed using interviewer-administered questionnaires and the American Urological Association Symptom Index. This analysis was conducted among 1865 participants with an AHT indication. Associations of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and loop and thiazide diuretics with the three groups of LUTS were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from multivariate logistic regression (referent group: untreated hypertension). Overlap in use was accounted for using monotherapy and combination therapy exposure categories. RESULTS: Among women, monotherapy with CCBs was associated with increased prevalence of nocturia (OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.04-6.74) and voiding symptoms (OR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.24-11.87); these results were confined to women aged <55 years. Among men of all ages, positive associations were observed for thiazides and voiding symptoms (monotherapy OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.17-7.19), and loop diuretics and nocturia (combination therapy OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.26-5.14). CONCLUSION: Results are consistent with the hypothesis that certain AHTs may aggravate LUTS. The presence of new or worsening LUTS among AHT users suggests medications should be reviewed and a change in AHT class considered.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Boston/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
GOALS: To elucidate the determinants of Oxalobacter formigenes colonization in humans. BACKGROUND: O. formigenes is a gram-negative anaerobic bacterium that colonizes the colon of a substantial proportion of the normal population and metabolizes dietary and endogenous oxalate. The bacterium has been associated with a large reduction in the odds of recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones. Subjects were 240 healthy individuals from Massachusetts and North Carolina. O. formigenes was detected by culture of fecal swabs. Information on factors of interest was obtained by telephone interviews and self-administered questionnaires. STUDY RESULTS: The overall prevalence of O. formigenes was 38%. Use of specific antibiotics previously thought to affect the bacterium was significantly related to colonization, with prevalences of 17%, 27%, and 36%, for those who had used these drugs <1, 1-5, and >5 years ago, compared with 55% in nonusers. There were no significant associations with demographic factors, nutrient intake, or medical history, although the prevalence appeared to increase somewhat with increasing oxalate consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Some antibiotics markedly affect colonization with O. formigenes. Although no other factor was identified as having a material influence on the prevalence of the bacterium, there is much to learn about how an individual acquires the organism and which factors affect persistence of colonization.
Assuntos
Oxalobacter formigenes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxalobacter formigenes/efeitos dos fármacos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Pediatric vitamin and mineral supplements are thought to be used commonly in the United States, but details of their use are lacking. Using data from the Slone Survey (a cross-sectional national random-digit-dial medication use survey), this study sought to define the prevalence and patterns of use of supplemental vitamins, fluoride, and iron among US children younger than 12 years of age. Primary statistical analyses involved descriptive statistics and calculation of weighted prevalence of use estimates with 95% confidence intervals. Between February 1998 and April 2007, there were 2,857 children 0 to 11 years of age enrolled from the 48 contiguous United States with weighted prevalence of use of vitamins, iron, and fluoride as the primary outcome. The response rate to the survey was 61%. Overall, 23.1% of children had used a vitamin, fluoride, or iron supplement in the 7 days before the interview, with use being highest among 2- to 5-year-olds. Almost all vitamins and most fluoride and iron were taken in the form of multicomponent products. The most commonly taken specific vitamins were C, D, B-12, B-6, and B-2, each by >20% of children. Overall, 3.3% of study participants took supplemental fluoride and 9.7% took supplemental iron. In conclusion, this study found that almost one-quarter of US children younger than 12 years of age, and 30% of 2-year-olds, use supplemental vitamins, fluoride, and iron in a given week. These data should be combined with what is known about the need for pediatric supplementation with vitamins, fluoride, and iron to help clinicians and policy makers counsel parents about the optimal use of these products.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fluoretos/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Ferro/administração & dosagem , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Prevalência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is not known to what extent the WHO classification scheme for MDS has been adopted in clinical practice. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 200 newly diagnosed MDS patients enrolled in our national registry during the years 2006-2008 to determine the scheme used. RESULTS: Clear WHO subtypes were recorded for 45.0% of patients, compared to 5.5% for FAB subtypes; 28.0% had MDS documented but without WHO or FAB subtype, and for 22.5%, the schema was unclear. CONCLUSION: Although many MDS patients do not have a subtype or schema documented, when they do, the WHO system is widely used.
Assuntos
Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/classificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Classificação/métodos , Feminino , Hematologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/epidemiologia , Patologia Clínica , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
PURPOSE: Few recent U.S. studies have examined population-based patterns in prescription drug use and even fewer have considered detailed patterns by race/ethnicity. In a representative community sample, our objectives were to determine the most commonly used prescription drug classes, and to describe their use by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. METHODS: Cross-sectional epidemiologic study of 5503 (1767 black, 1877 Hispanic, 1859 white) community-dwelling participants aged 30-79 in the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey (2002-2005). Using medication information collected from an in-home interview and medication inventory, the prevalence of use of a therapeutic class (95% confidence interval (95%CI)) in the past month was estimated by gender, age group, and race/ethnicity. Estimates were weighted inversely to the probability of sampling for generalizablity to Boston, MA. RESULTS: The therapeutic class containing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) antidepressants was most commonly used (14.6%), followed by statins (13.9%), beta-adrenergic blockers (10.6%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (10.5%). Within all age groups and both genders, black participants were substantially less likely than white to use SSRI/SNRI antidepressants (e.g., black men: 6.0% [95%CI: 3.9-8.1%]; white men: 15.0% [95%CI: 10.2-19.4%]). Other race/ethnic differences were observed: for example, black women were significantly less likely than other groups to use benzodiazepines (e.g., black: 2.6% [95%CI: 1.2-3.9%]; Hispanic: 9.4% [95%CI: 5.8-13.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnic differences in use of prescription therapeutic classes were observed in our community sample. Examining therapeutic classes rather than individual drugs resulted in a different distribution of common exposures compared to other surveys.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Populacionais/etnologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Boston/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Populacionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Using data from the Slone Survey, we sought to define the prevalence of over-the-counter and prescription medication use among US children <12 years of age and to determine the prevalence and patterns of use of the most commonly used medications. METHODS: The Slone Survey was a random-digit-dial telephone survey of medication use in the previous 7 days for a representative sample of the US population. Between February 1998 and April 2007, we enrolled 2857 children 0 to 11 years of age from the 48 contiguous US states. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 61%. Overall, 56% of children had used >or=1 medication product in the 7 days preceding the interview, with 15%, 7.1%, 3.1%, and 1.9% taking 2, 3, 4, and >or=5 medications, respectively, during that time period. Twenty percent of children took >or=1 prescription-only medications, but <6% used >or=2 prescription-only drugs within a given week. Fewer than 0.5% of children were reported to have used any particular herbal product. The most commonly used over-the-counter medication products were acetaminophen alone, multivitamins, and ibuprofen alone. The most commonly used prescription-only medications across all age groups were amoxicillin, albuterol, and multivitamins with fluoride. The most commonly consumed active ingredients (excluding vitamins) were acetaminophen, iron, ibuprofen, and various cough/cold ingredients (pseudoephedrine, dextromethorphan, and various first-generation antihistamines). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of US children <12 years of age use >or=1 medication product in a given week. The preponderance of pediatric medication exposure involves over-the-counter products.
Assuntos
Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
A case-control study of adult-onset leukemia was conducted in Bangkok, Thailand to explore the contribution of cellular telephone use and other factors to the etiology of the disease; 180 cases (87 acute myeloblastic leukemia, 40 acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 44 chronic myelogenous leukemia, eight chronic lymphocytic leukemia, one unclassified acute leukemia) were compared with 756 age- and sex-matched hospital controls. Data were obtained by interview; odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression. There was no clear association with cellular telephone phone use, but durations were relatively short (median 24-26 months), and there was a suggestion that risk may be increased for those with certain usage practices (ORs, 1.8-3.0 with lower confidence intervals >1.0) and those who used GSM service (OR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0). Myeloid leukemia (acute and chronic combined) was associated with benzene (OR, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11), a nonspecific group of other solvents (2.3; 1.1-4.9), occupational pesticides that were mostly unspecified (3.8; 2.1-7.1), and working with or near powerlines (4.3; 1.3-15). No associations were found for diagnostic X-rays, cigarette smoking, or other occupational exposures.
Assuntos
Leucemia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Benzeno/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Telefone Celular , Campos Eletromagnéticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia Induzida por Radiação/epidemiologia , Leucemia Induzida por Radiação/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional , Praguicidas/efeitos adversos , Radiografia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Solventes/efeitos adversos , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
In our recent case-control study on the association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), the risk of UGIB was higher in non-drinkers than in heavy-drinkers. To explore this unexpected finding, we re-analyzed the data to test whether non-drinking represented risk factors for UGIB and also conducted an additional survey to find any disagreement with the original study that might suggest information bias. In the re-analysis, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) of UGIB by classifying 183 non-drinkers in the original study into 39 ex- and 144 never-drinkers. We also measured the prevalence of potential risk factors of UGIB in controls. In the new survey, we sent a self-administered questionnaire on previous alcohol consumption. In the re-analysis, the OR for ex-drinking (5.4) was higher and the OR for never-drinking (2.6) was lower than the OR for non- (ex- plus never-) drinking (3.2) in the original study. Ex-drinkers had higher prevalence of H. pylori infection, history of previous ulcer and use of GI drugs than other types of drinkers. The answers on their previous alcohol consumption were consistent between the original and new surveys both in cases (kappa = 0.74) and controls (kappa = 0.73). Ex-drinking may represent unmeasured risk factors for UGIB such as undiagnosed ulcer. In an observational study of UGIB, ex-drinking may be distinguished from never-drinking as a potential surrogate for UGIB risk. When prescribing an NSAID to an ex-drinker in clinical practice, one may make sure to explore whether an ex-drinker has a history of ulcer.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relation of medications to the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children <15 years of age. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis by using data from 2 multicenter international case-control studies: the severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) study and the multinational severe cutaneous adverse reaction (EuroSCAR) study conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, the Netherlands, Austria, and Israel. We selected case subjects aged <15 years, hospitalized for Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis-overlap, or toxic epidermal necrolysis, and age-, gender-, and country-matched hospital controls. Pooled crude odds ratios were estimated and adjusted for confounding by multivariate methods when numbers permitted. RESULTS: Our study included 80 cases and 216 matched controls. Antiinfective sulfonamides, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine were strongly associated with the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Significant associations were highlighted in univariate analysis for valproic acid and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as a group and for acetaminophen (paracetamol) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed 4 previously highly suspected drug risk factors for Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in children: antiinfective sulfonamides, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine. Among more unexpected risk factors, we suspect that acetaminophen (paracetamol) use increases the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis.